Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dear All,

I recently purchaced some great tools of the daughter of a late watchmaker. With me beeing a novice (working om Mark's course # 1) and the lady not having a clue about here fathers' trade, I'm facing challenges with some of these tools. What are they called and what are they intended for?

1 M.K.S Made in Japan. This seems a quiet rough tool for watches to me... Could it be for clocks?

2 La Coulissante

3 Aluminum piece, the "knob" does not come off.

4 Interesting... but what are they?

5 All little lids fit in the tool

6 A kind of clamping tool?

7 An interesting looking spanner

8 A kind of drill, but it does not look this should go in an drilling machine

9 various sizes, hollow plastic noses, with spare noses, old but brandnew, noses cannot be pressed in, are they some kind of oilers

Hope someone can help me out. Now, back to my study. Assessment coming up tomorrow!!

Kind regards,

Bert

20181208_152256_resized.thumb.jpg.60373f7f5e582bb612d5245d739eee58.jpg

20181208_152405_resized.jpg

Posted

4) are hand pliers. They are for holding watch hands so you can ream out the hole in them.

I need bigger photos of everything else before I couls guess what they are.

 

Nice selection of tools you picked up

  • Like 1
Posted

Number 1 is a case back opener I think the long metal rod fits through holes on the silver round slotted part the black parts are dies that fit into it also, these dies I think are for Rolex case backs are they very finely toothed along their edge ?

  • Like 1
Posted

This is take on the tools:

1: ???????????
2: A screw case opener
3: Looks like a screwdriver holder
4: Types of clamps mainly used to resize hand pipes
5: ??????????
6: ?????????
7: I think this is a tool for punch holes in main springs
8: A pin vice
9: Might be either various hand setters or quartz trimmers, which were required in some vintage quartz movements. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Many thanks to all of you! The list is now nearly complete...

Have a look at # 3 now: a screwdriver holder!

#1: A Rolex caseback opener, made in Japan:biggrin:

20181209_134417_resized.thumb.jpg.a9b9a6614df7a93836be715af76177b2.jpg20181209_131937_resized.thumb.jpg.7d87048212e24f6b764341c90de14455.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi all, Might a posit a theory and people can chime in and tell me if I'm barking up the wrong sycamore: If a mainspring is a bit coned and returned to its barrel for reuse, is it less likely to slip when the spring gets to fully wound?  For a bit of background: Slava 2427, barrel walls greased with 8217, six dots evenly spaced around each of the barrel walls, then smeared/ spread along the wall before popping the springs in. 
    • What kind of screwplate are you using? The old Martin ones commonly came in B and L variants. The thread pitch is slightly different between the two, and the full thread diameters tend to be a little off from metric nominal, but the B plates are close enough to metric that they work most of the time. The numbering follows (pretty much) the numbering for stems- at least how stems threads are commonly called out. So a "tap 12" would be 0.70mm. (I can only guess the "tap" size for stems comes from these old plates)   These old plates tend to cut some and also form the thread by displacing metal. I think in part because they are low-tech, and also generally a bit worn. So it's good to start quite undersize with your initial diameter, and work up to something that gives a full thread form. There are variances plate to plate too, most likely a combination of manufacturing differences and wear.   I haven't tried any modern screw plates, I think they are of questionable origin, and even if marked in metric, probably merit some experimentation like the antique ones to find a good starting diameter.    
    • Exactly. As Richard says, all good - I helped you by splitting your comment made on an old topic into a new topic of your own in order to help with clarity 🙂 Welcome to the forum by the way 👍
    • Mark, means he has made this a separate post, he has split it from the old post. You don't need to start a new thread now. 
    • No, my first time. I've watched the video, lets hope it looks as good as yours. 
×
×
  • Create New...