Jump to content

The elusive vintage Cannon Pinion Puller


Recommended Posts

Well as I venture into the land of Horology, it can take a while until one really appreciates the tools of the trade. As I had read/watched Mark respond to a post once “the collection of tools never ends”. I can see that now.

I have always been a tool guy, no matter what I am doing, from oil & gas drilling to scores of workshop projects. Everything is done better with the right tool, and there’s a tool for everything.  

Personally, I am generally a LOT buyer, but that’s a story for another post.

This post is about a tool I hear Mark reference and recommend quite often. What I found is that they are like Hens Teeth, and hard to come by, unless of course you want to pay a fortune. Well, perseverance paid off a couple days back and I finally picked up the elusive vintage Cannon Pinion Puller for the descent price of $34.

Whereas I have had the good luck of pulling Cannon Pinions using various methods, it was only a matter of time.

Well my best to all and your tool collecting,

Will

CANNON PINION PULLER-01-01.jpg

CANNON PINION PULLER-03.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I need a cannon pinion puller for the Bulova 11 BLC movement. I got the wheel off using two razor blades, but it came flying off, so I don't want to repeat that. I've seen one for $13 on Esslinger, Watch Cannon Pinion Remover and Watch Hand Remover Tool. It looks like the same design as more expensive models. Will it get the job done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, rph952 said:

I need a cannon pinion puller for the Bulova 11 BLC movement. I got the wheel off using two razor blades, but it came flying off, so I don't want to repeat that. I've seen one for $13 on Esslinger, Watch Cannon Pinion Remover and Watch Hand Remover Tool. It looks like the same design as more expensive models. Will it get the job done?

Unfortunately, there is no one tool for every case. Sometimes there might be something in the way where the tool might not be able to rest squarely.

And the newer cannon pinion puller made by Bergeon has been found to be unable to grip smaller size cannon pinions. Even some of the vintage K&D ones were unable to grip small cannon pinions. If you search in this forum, other users have run into this problem.

The Presto style puller does work quite well but like I said earlier, not in every case.

Sometimes you just have to grip the cannon pinion with a pin vise and pull it off.

Anyway, I think most of us will end up with a box full of cannon pinion pullers. So start your collection today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, rph952 said:

Thanks for your advice Hector. Here's the part I need to pull. I think it's called a fourth wheel. For the minute hand.

4thwheel.jpg

Ok, that's not a cannon pinion. That's a centre second pinion drive wheel.

There are several options for dealing with this. You can leave it alone and clean the bridge with the freewheel as a whole. Or you can get a Presto No. 3, 5 spoke wheel puller, or wedge 2 sewing needles under the wheel as close to the centre hub as possible and pop it off. Or my favorite method as taught by my mentor, just remove the bridge with the freewheel intact, then using your fingers to grip the wheels on both sides and gently twist them off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Are there any alternatives to a Bergeon 5 spoke Presto tool..... I think its ridiculous that they charge $70-100 for a tool which is almost identical to a $10 Chinese cannon pinion removing tool - I refuse to pay 10 times as much just because it has a Bergeon stamp on it. Anyone have an 'off brad" alternative?

And don't get me started on mainspring winders........

FYI Cousins UK have the Bergeon style (non presto) cannon pinion pulling tools brand new for half what you would pay on eBay for a used one. Just received mine and is great.

Cousins.png

Edited by Waggy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...