Jump to content

End Shake On New Balance Staff


Legarm

Recommended Posts

I have just followed Marks video on replacing a Balance Staff. All went great, fitted to check end shake and it was very tight.

I am assuming you adjust the jewel on the Balance cock and not at the roller end.

Not going to carry on with that until I'm sure.

Thanks for looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any dimples on the main plate near the balance cock screw hole? If so then a previous repairer may have made an adjustment to the effective cock height using that method. If this is the case then have the dimples been smoothed down by any chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any dimples on the main plate near the balance cock screw hole? If so then a previous repairer may have made an adjustment to the effective cock height using that method. If this is the case then have the dimples been smoothed down by any chance?

 

Hmmmmmmm, not au fait with "that method". But I shall look for Dimples after my nice cup of tea and home baked bread with home made plum jam...... :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hand a pocket watch with the same fault. When I stripped the watch there was a tiny slip of thick paper under the bridge. Without it the balance was too tight BUT with it, it ran great. I have read that when using this dodge the position of packings is important i.e packed at the rear tightens the balance and packed at the front lifts the bridge so loosens the balance.

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"That method" is not so uncommon with older movements.

 

Just looked through three movements on my bench I am working on and the third one had this done in the past:

 

post-1-0-27277800-1414602957_thumb.jpg

 

You will notice in the hi-lighted portion that there are two dimples which have been created (using a graver or sharp screwdriver).

 

If these are done behind the screw hole (as in the picture) then it will effectively reduce the endshake. And it would increase the endshake if it is done in front of the screw hole (closer to the balance wheel).

 

I knew a watch repairer that would use paper to achieve the same result. Also you will find that some watch movements will have a metal shim between the cock and the mainplate - Sekonda used to do this.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right.... had a look at it and no dimples, or evidence of being filed down. This method does seem to me to be a bit of a, "Yee Haa" method.

I would of thought that raising or lowering a jewel would be the correct way to go. On saying that, I am, at present also working on a Russian movement, which has got a metal shim, which has been professionally made and is a perfect fit to the shape of the balance cock.

Is it not correct to raise or lower the jewels? In my case the jewelling is not of the shockproof type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this what the Bergeon rounding tool is used for ?? 

 

Are you talking about Bergeon 5482?

 

If so then no. If we are talking about 1/100mm or 2/100mm reduction you will be working all day using that thing. It is useful when you reduce the pivot length using an arkansas stone - finish with the rounder if needed (using some diamantine mixed with oil in the cup end). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right.... had a look at it and no dimples, or evidence of being filed down. This method does seem to me to be a bit of a, "Yee Haa" method.

I would of thought that raising or lowering a jewel would be the correct way to go. On saying that, I am, at present also working on a Russian movement, which has got a metal shim, which has been professionally made and is a perfect fit to the shape of the balance cock.

Is it not correct to raise or lower the jewels? In my case the jewelling is not of the shockproof type.

 

How is the endstone mounted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it is the Bergeon 5482 I was looking at. 

Therefore I presume it is used to shape the end of a pivot/balance when being made.

So many failures I have lost count with this, but this tool might help.

 

I personally didn't like it. It is very slow to use. Much prefer rounding using a Jacot.

 

Jacot: about 2.5seconds to round off a pivot (plus setup time).

This tool: after 20 minutes I just got the Jacot out :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decided to go the "Shim" route, as twatting the plate seemed a bit wrong. Also I would think that the indentations, front or back, of the screw holes would cause the Balance Cock to be on an incline, maybe causing the jewel to be out of alignment vertically.

Anyway this is what I have done.............

 

Shim made from edge of tablet strip......

post-227-0-33141700-1414671380_thumb.jpg

 

Cut out with scalpel....

post-227-0-34899400-1414671384_thumb.jpg

 

Holes for screw posts.....

post-227-0-88298800-1414671387_thumb.jpg

 

On the plate....

post-227-0-62502300-1414671394_thumb.jpg

 

All done and running lovely.....   :)

post-227-0-72381400-1414671399_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I started this movement it was a right rust bucket, anything that could rust had nearly. the barrel was a mess and the keyless works were a homogeneous mass of rust. So after a couple of weeks of intermittent work it is now back working, just got to see the timing situation.

This was my first attempt at changing a balance staff, hence this topic, it has gone very well with the help I have received and I therefore thank you for your input.

This could only be done after studying Marks fantastic Vid's.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right.... had a look at it and no dimples, or evidence of being filed down. This method does seem to me to be a bit of a, "Yee Haa" method.

I would of thought that raising or lowering a jewel would be the correct way to go. On saying that, I am, at present also working on a Russian movement, which has got a metal shim, which has been professionally made and is a perfect fit to the shape of the balance cock.

Is it not correct to raise or lower the jewels? In my case the jewelling is not of the shockproof type.

All the Russian watches I've tinkered with use shims.

When you get the dimples or scratches i always thought this was bad practice as the previous repairer hadn't got the correctly sized staff and modified the watch to the incorrect staff as opposed to the other way round... If that makes sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the Russian watches I've tinkered with use shims.

When you get the dimples or scratches i always thought this was bad practice as the previous repairer hadn't got the correctly sized staff and modified the watch to the incorrect staff as opposed to the other way round... If that makes sense!

 

I agree,

 

I've seen similar practice on larger engineering jobs,  eg ;  to tighten up a loose bearing track in a housing, etc,  I've always considered it to be a bit of an ''educated bodge''.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree,

 

I've seen similar practice on larger engineering jobs,  eg ;  to tighten up a loose bearing track in a housing, etc,  I've always considered it to be a bit of an ''educated bodge''.

Nothing educated about it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup - and its amazing how often you will see it on vintage movements and modern ones as well.

 

I suppose some customers would not want to pay for the amount of time a watch repairer would have to spend to do the job properly, so the quick and dirty approach is adopted.

 

The problem is - the next watch repairer who works on the watch, is the poor bugger who has to deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
×
×
  • Create New...