Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

CIMG0633.thumb.JPG.3e3c51fa4e8de19e347a2550661707a4.JPG

I picked this out of the scrap pile this evening, as the internet had gone down, and it was pissing down with rain outside, so I was in need of a little watch therapy. I didn't hold out much hope for it as the balance appeared to be glued in place, so I thought the pivots were probably bent. However with a little stripping, cleaning and a little oiling, (the watch you understand, not me), off it went. No fusee chains were injured in the process, which was a bit of a relief.

CIMG0638.thumb.JPG.6d9fd03f2df0b59b28e572a4e43ae971.JPG

Its a shame I don't have a suitable case for it, as that intricate engine turned dial, blued hands and fusee movement could do with a new home.  I'm not sure if the jewel is a diamond, or the balance is gold, but whatever they are, its quite spectacular. Dial is 35.75mm and the movement is 33.80mm, depth/thickness is around 10.00mm so its also relatively small for the time. You could almost squeeze it into a large wrist watch case.

Shame the dial has been bashed about a bit and the original case melted down, probably to make sovereign rings for chavs. 😉

The internet is now limping along, so I barely have the bandwidth to post a couple of still pictures. No moving movement videos tonight I'm afraid.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 3
Posted
On 9/20/2023 at 11:56 PM, rehajm said:

I like Alex a lot. I learned a couple things from this- on this old stuff the grease on glass for the wolf teeth and liberal use of 9504 instead of hp or 9104…

He doesn’t live far from me and I think I owe him a pint…

Gosh Rehajm. You know Alex and can meet?  Wow. If you do, give him my personal regards. Been a great tutor to many of us novices. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, AndyHull said:

I nearly picked up one of these for a song a couple of years back, but I was pipped at the post. The calibre reminds  me somewhat of the HMT 0231 (and the related Citizen 0200 and 1800 families)

I realize he's just being cheeky about 'copy my homework' but 'copy' is a loaded word. Since forever brands using movements from other companies was standard practice, not a exception, and certainly not a 'copy.'...rant over...

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, rehajm said:

Since forever brands using movements from other companies was standard practice, not a exception, and certainly not a 'copy.'...rant over...

I guess it was more of a cheaper design based on an existing layout, rather than an actual direct clone copy. The same could be said for a number of movements from the Soviet Union, that borrowed a lot of Swiss (and in some cases French ) movement design ideas, but were unique in their own way.

The HMT is however a licensed copy of the Citizen, but it does have some simplifications and is sometimes, but not always, finished to a slightly less refined standard. I have swapped parts from the Citizen to the HMT and vice versa and they are mostly interchangeable.

In China, perhaps not averse to borrowing designs lock stock and barrel, the Chinese standard movement is more or less a clean sheet design.

Edited by AndyHull
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
6 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

3d printer

The comments are interesting for which I agree with. Most people don't have spare 3-D printers laying around. Interesting idea of building a cleaning machine though. Although you can buy the same aluminum that 3-D printers made out of and probably redesign the whole thing but still an interesting idea

Posted
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

The comments are interesting for which I agree with. Most people don't have spare 3-D printers laying around. Interesting idea of building a cleaning machine though. Although you can buy the same aluminum that 3-D printers made out of and probably redesign the whole thing but still an interesting idea

I suspect you could build something with a couple of stepper motors, some T-slot aluminium and an Arduino with a motor shield, but for not much more than the cost of sourcing those parts, you could also probably pick up a cheap Chinese 3D printer kit on Ali Express.

A simple low end known brand kit Like a Tronxy CRUX 1 comes in around £140.00 GBP but there are cheaper options. You can also pick up second hand 3D printers for much less, depending on age and condition.

I would suggest if you want a 3D printer, and you also want a watch cleaning machine, then your 3D printer can do double duty, but I wouldn't necessarily buy a 3D printer just to convert it to a watch cleaning machine as there are probably simpler and cheaper options.

Posted (edited)

I was actually looking to do the same thing. I was thinking of doing the program simply as gcode. Utilize the bed heater or extruder heater connection of the main board to run the drying heater and extruder connection to run the agitation motor. Hadn't had the chance to try that out.

My current setup is based on a laboratory stirring motor, turntable, a PTC car heater, and 3D printed basket setup. I have to manually change it over from jar to jar.  An automated cleaner would be nice.

17 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Got a 3d printer? Not got a watch cleaning machine?
In that case you might find this interesting -> https://hackaday.com/2023/11/23/an-automated-watch-cleaner-from-an-older-3d-printer/#comments

image.png.b6b533ab24450f7a4dcc83bd976cb2b2.png

 

Edited by gpraceman
Posted
13 hours ago, AndyHull said:

sourcing those parts

No need to source a whole 3-D printer besides a lot of 3-D printers aren't big enough for tall enough to do this anyway. It's amazing what you can find on eBay. From time to time companies I go out of business liquidate their stuff on eBay and then you can pick up stepping motors and all sorts of bits and pieces were very good prices. Plus just the usual yet the woman him all kinds of things off of eBay

then rather than convert a 3-D printer maybe just take all the bits and pieces and build something like the cleaning machine. For instance 3-D printers have XY and Z we don't need all those accesses for the cleaning machine. You obviously need the Z to raise and lower the basket but you really only need something to either move the jars or move the basket. If you are really clever you can figure out how to put the jars in a circle and rotate the entire assembly like they do on a regular cleaning machines.

OR have a central column in a short arm for the cleaning basket z-axis. As you don't really have to go all the way across with two stepping motors necessarily and then just move the jars back and forth all sorts of ways of doing this but still an interesting idea and it has people talking.

13 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Arduino with a motor shield

Either this or the or the combined altogether CNC unit where their integrated together those are available relatively inexpensively.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

No need to source a whole 3-D printer besides a lot of 3-D printers aren't big enough for tall enough to do this anyway. It's amazing what you can find on eBay. From time to time companies I go out of business liquidate their stuff on eBay and then you can pick up stepping motors and all sorts of bits and pieces were very good prices. Plus just the usual yet the woman him all kinds of things off of eBay

then rather than convert a 3-D printer maybe just take all the bits and pieces and build something like the cleaning machine. For instance 3-D printers have XY and Z we don't need all those accesses for the cleaning machine. You obviously need the Z to raise and lower the basket but you really only need something to either move the jars or move the basket. If you are really clever you can figure out how to put the jars in a circle and rotate the entire assembly like they do on a regular cleaning machines.

Not tall enough?  That guy's setup shows that it is certainly possible.  I did a test fit of my jars and heater on my Ender 3 Pro and all would fit and was tall enough to accommodate a motor on the gantry for spinning the basket.  An Ender 3 can be had for under $200.  Adapting such a machine for watch cleaning might a project that a lot of people could do.  Though, I imagine a simpler adaptation than this guy did.

 

Edited by gpraceman
Posted
29 minutes ago, gpraceman said:

Not tall enough?  That guy's setup shows that it is certainly possible. 

Not all printers are the same. For instance if I was to cannibalize my first printer which still works fine it wouldn't work at all because it's not Tall and with a 6 inch bed it's not big enough. My Delta printer more than tall enough but I'm not sure that I get three jars underneath. So not all 3-D printers are tall enough or big enough.

I make it a better to take the idea and cannibalize the 3-D printer for parts or just buy some new aluminum off of eBay it's relatively cheap. Then even stepping motors controlling boards and all kinds of stuff can be found cheap on eBay if you're willing to take the time to lock. Especially if you can find somebody getting rid of 3-D printer companies that have gone out of business then you can really get some deals. Where basically they throw whole bunch of stuff in a box for not very much at all. Although these kind of things are few and far between but still they pop up occasionally allows you to get stepping motors power supplies the heated bed etc. because often times the people liquidating either don't care or don't know what they're selling.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

As well as a compulsive horological problem, another itch that gets scratched occasionally is the yen for yet another microscope.

When I last checked in the mirror I still only had two eyes, but I have enough close up viewing apparatus around the place to satisfy the optical needs of the average spider. Despite this obvious fact, I threw a few more of my hard earned coppers (six pounds and ninety nine pence worth of British pennies to be a little more precise) at this little "beauty".

AsPurchased5-l1600.thumb.jpg.2f2e000e7267acd1a27f496ab3cdb3e4.jpg

Yes, it is a little ugly, and seems to be partially in kit form, but I think it is more or less complete and probably relatively old, possibly late Victorian. I think it would most likely fit the description of "field microscope".

Much cleaning and polishing of glass and brass, and possibly a little repainting and/or re-plating will no doubt be needed to bring it back to a serviceable condition.

image.png.51abf6b4f862b158c74d199866ff8165.png

Sadly it didn't come with the camera adapter.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

image.thumb.png.4e4538b54dbe71b6c34cf0285f492169.png

1,000 hr power reserve.
If you have pockets deeper than the Mariana trench, and an aversion to winding, this may be just the thing for you.

All joking aside, it is an impressive piece.


https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/10/fashion/watches-haute-rive-stephane-von-gunter-switzerland.html

 

You would think for that price they would have put some numbers on the dial 🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Beauty in the eye of the beholder. Can't get into these open works thingies. Don't mind seeing the workings via the back. But I find that the machines works view through the dial is confusing and detrimental to use. As I said Beauty in the eye of the beholder.

Edited by rossjackson01
Spelling, Grammar
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi All. I would appreciate some advice for a complete newbie on getting into watch servicing - nothing serious,  just as a fun project. I've got a thing for hand-wound watches and would like to bring an old watch (or two) back to life, so looking to learn to do a strip-clean-oil-assemble cycle.   I've toyed with this idea in the past (years ago) and picked up a couple candidates to learn on, but never found the time for them.  One is an old Ingersoll, swiss-made 17 jewels. It seems to wind and tick. Casing, dial, glass are in great shape, so looks like a good candidate to me for the first service. The other is a Benrus DR23. It winds and makes a few reluctant ticks, but then seems to stop. Casing looks like a complete gonner, and the dial is in pretty poor shape too. If the movement is not broken and just needs a service, I wonder if there's any possibility of getting a cheapo Chinese casing & dial to fit this movement in, or is it extremely unlikely to be the right size?   For a start, I want to strip & assemble a movement, perhaps a dozen times to build up the basic parts handling skills. I see that online advice is to buy a Chinese-made ST36 for this purpose. Can I just go at the Benrus or Ingersoll instead, or does it make more sense to get a cheap ST for this? Thank you.    
    • Hi,  I have this vintage Navitimer 806 with a bezel that plays a little bit as shown in this video: https://imgur.com/a/2NjdiF0 How would you fix this? I don't see where a gasket would fit for instance. Also, it seems this issue happens sometimes with older Navitimers.  Thanks
    • This is a screenshot of a video of it running. Not the best quality, though.
    • Depends what sizes of watches you mostly service . If you were to say pocket watches then you might benefit by wholly replacing the 9010 for 9020. As a rough guide hp500 is twice the viscosity of 9020 which is twice the viscosity of 9010 at 20°c.  So hp500 would give you a more mid-range oil between thin 9010 and HP1300, but as it happens hp750 is more mid- range than hp500, but is that more or less useful when oiling a train of wheels. After the barrel arbor the jump down in pivot size is around half, then after the centre wheel maybe more than half until the escapement. And pivot size isn't especially a deciding factor, as the torque and speed of a pivot would be more relevant when thinking about which oil to choose. So 750 might only be useful on a centre wheel and nothing else, and 500 might be better than 1300 for oiling the centre wheel but still comprises the rest of the train, where 9020 would be ok for the train but too thin for the centre wheel, leaving only 1300 for the oiling of it. You see the problem we're having here. What can be ok for one thing is less ok for another in a different way, damping down power compared to oil spread.  Maybe mixing a drop from two opposite range viscosity synthetic oils will give you some approximate thickness of an in-between . You want a short answer now ?  I tnink I'd go with the 9020. Now be prepared for a whole host of different answers. Then to go with this, watch manufacturers change their minds about which oils to use more times than actresses change their knickers. 
×
×
  • Create New...