Jump to content

Strange Timegrapher display


mikepilk

Recommended Posts

I just put a Revue MSR T43 on the Timegrapher and I'm getting this odd display.

Visually it looks to be in beat, and the amplitude looks good. 

I don't understand how you can have two close traces and a large beat error. Don't they come from the same signals ?

 

20180928_162254.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can now answer my own question - I should have done some more searching.

I found the thread   3407-single-line-and-57ms-beat-error/

It appears that with a Weishi 1000, with a beat error of about 5.5 ms, one plot rolls-over and plots close to the other, giving the false impression that they are close. 

I followed the advice in the thread, and moved the stud arm clockwise - problem solved.

It goes to show that you can have a huge beat error, with relatively little effect on amplitude. 

 

 

 

 

20180928_180706.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had long educational lessons from @JohnR725 and he mentioned this "overlapping" problem when "way-out" of beat. My Laco's are statically in beat, but the software showed 9.8 ms ...... We are still not sure what's going on; software or mechanical....

I read the thread you are referring to and it's amazing to see how many times JohnR725 stepped in with his time-machine knowledge .....:thumbsu:

Anyway, you found the answer and solved the problem ;)

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are several important rules to remember when using the timing machine. First pay attention the numbers and the graphical display and make sure they agree plus visually look at the watch and make sure whatever the watch is doing agrees with what you see on the timing machine. Then my favorite phrase for timing machines is garbage in garbage out. If the graphical display looks like total crap the numbers will be the same. Is not like the timing machine can magically look at the random dots and produce a rate or an amplitude that is going to be correct.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

there are several important rules to remember when using the timing machine. First pay attention the numbers and the graphical display and make sure they agree plus visually look at the watch and make sure whatever the watch is doing agrees with what you see on the timing machine. Then my favorite phrase for timing machines is garbage in garbage out. If the graphical display looks like total crap the numbers will be the same. Is not like the timing machine can magically look at the random dots and produce a rate or an amplitude that is going to be correct.

 

I did a visual check that it was in beat, and the amplitude looked good, which is why I was confused with the display.

Another lesson learned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The cannon pinion (be it conventional style or what you see in this movement) should slip on its arbour so the hands can be set independently without affecting the gear train.  If there is too much friction between the cannon pinion and the second wheel, turning the hands to set them backwards can sometimes force the escape wheel teeth to overrun the pallet stones, creating the behaviour you describe. The train is running in reverse when this happens.  This can often chip the pallet stones. I’d say at least half of the watches I’ve inspected with very tight cannon pinions had chipped pallet stones. Hopefully this isn’t the case with your watch.  I’m not familiar with this movement but you need to get the friction in the cannon pinion adjusted correctly.  Hope this helps, Mark
    • Pallet fork was in. I’d had the movement running ok, and only removed the balance to flip it over and install the keyless works and date mechanism. The pallet fork wasn’t locking the gear train when hand setting - it was oscillating as the escape wheel rotated. This may have been in one direction only - can’t remember. 
    • Hi   Find attached parts/repair notes for the JLC 911,  might be useful. JLC_JLC 910, 911.pdf JLC_JLC 910, 911 Repair Notes.pdf
    • Hello and welcome to the forum Dan. Used to know Middlesboro quite well, that was twenty years plus ago. Attached a little reading to get you started. TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf
    • for the most part no. Each individual watchmaker and/or shop had their own system. One of the shops I worked at basically had a reference to a page number in a book. then there are some shops that do no markings at all as they keep their records on a computer and they don't have to mark the watch. Usually if somebody is marking and they've service the watch before you'll see those next to each other. then as far as anything resembling a standard goes at one time the American watch and clockmakers Institute assigned all of their members a number. but that was a very long time ago and I doubt that they are using it anymore.
×
×
  • Create New...