Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A friend asked me last year if I could fix her 9kt gold Adaux cocktail watch that had been left to her by her mother. A quick look soon diagnosed a broken balance staff, so the Internet hunt began. The first complete balance that was sold as "new" had both pivot broken off, but luckily a refund was made quickly. The second came from the states and was NOS still in original blister pack.

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

The movement is an FHF 60 and is slightly smaller than a new UK penny so this was going to be a challenge because of the size. I duly set about about dismantling it after dressing my smallest screwdrivers to ensure perfect fit with the tiny screws, particularly the one that hold on the cap jewels. The movement was thoroughly cleaned, lubed, reassembled and timed using my timegrapher. I am well pleased with the timekeeping.

I refinished the case and crystal, installed the movement and fitted a new strap. It certainly made a change from working on these "massive"gents watches!

5.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Nice one Geo, and that's a really pretty little Audax.

I actually started out with ladies watches partly because they tend to be so much cheaper than similar quality gents watches, but also because I figured that if I could get to grips with the smaller movements then the bigger jobs would be easy. I still really enjoy working on them and it's nice to see others doing the same.

Posted

Nice one George. 

 

I have a couple of ladies watches on the back burner that I have bottled out of for a while but yet may "man up" to the job after seeing your excellent work.  Now I can actually see what I am doing with the scope it may be ok, but they are really small.

 

There are a couple of definitive factors in this pursuit of watch repair that seems to be essential - patience and contemplation.  They do bring rewards bordering on the esoteric though.

 

Cheers,  Vic

  • Like 1
Posted

Well done Geo, nice job !

 

just wondered what size eyeglass you used ?  as I have a couple of similar watches to do but I've been saving them for the right moment as I'm a little concerned about the size,  

Posted

Well done Geo, nice job !

 

just wondered what size eyeglass you used ?

Thanks for the comments guys.

Most of the work was done with my 3.5x visor. Lubrication was done with 10x loupe.

Posted (edited)

Very nice job Geo! Not your average run of the mill overhaul. What do you mean by "dressing" your screw drivers? I see that the cap screws are very small and I just had the same problem on a similar screw where my driver tip has a little curve in it that causes the screwdriver to slip. I know you guys have done a whole  long thread on this topic of screwdrivers. Do you mean you sharpen them up with a stone?

 

JC

Edited by noirrac1j
Posted

Do you mean you sharpen them up with a stone?

 

JC

Hi Joe, that is exactly what I mean. I use a fine, and extra fine diamond slips to keep my drivers in perfect condition. Making sure that your screwdrivers are both the correct fit and sharp is something overlooked by some folk.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...