Jump to content

Timegrapher microphone


Simonkitch

Recommended Posts

you need to know what the input characteristics of your microphone input is in other words what is the device expecting? Then the schematic versus the breadboard at least as far as the resistor goes isn't the same value? then is that the same transistor and we need the pin out of the transistor because casually something doesn't quite look right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you need to know what the input characteristics of your microphone input is in other words what is the device expecting? Then the schematic versus the breadboard at least as far as the resistor goes isn't the same value? then is that the same transistor and we need the pin out of the transistor because casually something doesn't quite look right?

Omg this is much harder than I thought it would be [emoji28]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you need to know what the input characteristics of your microphone input is in other words what is the device expecting? Then the schematic versus the breadboard at least as far as the resistor goes isn't the same value? then is that the same transistor and we need the pin out of the transistor because casually something doesn't quite look right?

526fe1435d55533e73f68e3d7c196305.jpg
Okay I changed my resistor and it works now. Decided to try out this op amp build and so far getting great feedback on my speakers. However, I’m having difficulty getting my MacBook or iPhone to recognize this as a mic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though I just noticed it up above I have a link which shows the input just not the characteristics I was looking for? So they swap the ground in the input. To answer a question get out a meter and measure the voltage between the ground and the input if there's voltage present then it's expecting a capacitive microphone which is why the transistor circuit worked because it's being powered by the device. If using up op amp you have to have a capacitor on the input because you do not want the power going back into your op amp.

https://superuser.com/questions/361980/recording-with-audio-input-macbook-air

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though I just noticed it up above I have a link which shows the input just not the characteristics I was looking for? So they swap the ground in the input. To answer a question get out a meter and measure the voltage between the ground and the input if there's voltage present then it's expecting a capacitive microphone which is why the transistor circuit worked because it's being powered by the device. If using up op amp you have to have a capacitor on the input because you do not want the power going back into your op amp.
https://superuser.com/questions/361980/recording-with-audio-input-macbook-air

Okay maybe I wasn’t clear enough. Let me explain. Both the transistor and the op amp works with or without the batteries on my speaker via the aux in.

However the problem comes when attaching the 3.5mm plug to my MacBook, and when attaching the 3.5mm plug to my lightning adaptor and to my iPhone. Either ways they don’t get detected as mics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Jameson said:

Anyone has success plugging this into a MacBook and getting it detected as a mic?

I'm guessing the answer is no. Out of curiosity if you can get it to go into the MacBook is there an application for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing the answer is no. Out of curiosity if you can get it to go into the MacBook is there an application for it?

Yeah I figured. I’m able to get my mic working with speakers and windows computers, but when it comes to my iPhone X, I’m stuck, and I have the timegrapher app. And then I realized that it wouldn’t work with my MacBook as well. Hence my question as to whether anyone has got it to work with Apple because I think Apple has some restrictions. Dang.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's one of the ancient classic problems IBM versus Apple. IBM open source Apple closed. May not apply to your MacBook but typically in the past PCs were more open for technical documentation versus Apple. Which unfortunately is not a helpful answer for you at all.

Then went back to we need to technical specifications for the microphone for your MacBook. PC computers are expecting capacitive microphones in a variety of circuits. Is a lot of variation of what actually it's expecting.

Searching the Internet I found a few things zero idea whether it's a going be any help at all. There is a reference to USB though I wonder if you could use a USB audio input?

https://www.musiconerd.com/single-post/How-to-use-an-external-mic-on-a-Macbook-Pro-2019

This one is different but it's also interesting is a reference to meeting the headphone to get the microphone to work?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k1MfRs8DlI

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's one of the ancient classic problems IBM versus Apple. IBM open source Apple closed. May not apply to your MacBook but typically in the past PCs were more open for technical documentation versus Apple. Which unfortunately is not a helpful answer for you at all.
Then went back to we need to technical specifications for the microphone for your MacBook. PC computers are expecting capacitive microphones in a variety of circuits. Is a lot of variation of what actually it's expecting.
Searching the Internet I found a few things zero idea whether it's a going be any help at all. There is a reference to USB though I wonder if you could use a USB audio input?
https://www.musiconerd.com/single-post/How-to-use-an-external-mic-on-a-Macbook-Pro-2019
This one is different but it's also interesting is a reference to meeting the headphone to get the microphone to work?

 
 
 
 

Will look into it. Thanks so much!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That will mean dismantling the gear train, which with 5 pivots to align was a pain. Probably going to have to though. I'm convinced it's something to do with the great wheel. 
    • As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...