Jump to content

omega 26.5 t3 main spring issues


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I have serviced and repaired my fathers broken omega with a 26.5 t3 moment I have managed to get it all back together, but can not get the main spring to wind, I have tried putting it in two ways, but the barrel just moves with no spring wind at all. 

 

I have replaced the arbour and that hasn't seemed to help either. after a while of winding the keyless works seem to slip as well and start moving the monition works which is also frustrating. 

 

does anyone have any pointers of experience with this movement? 

 

Many thanks 

 

Andy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you test the barrel alone by winding the arbor to see if the mainspring had hooked on correctly? You could have inserted it the wrong way around for example.

Another common fault with assembling keyless works is to insert the castle wheel the wrong way round as the teeth have different profiles on either side.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, Have two barrels, one with an old spring and one with a new spring, have tried inserting the new spring both ways, and have tested that it hooks, it does, it should wind..... and nothing is working.

The keyless works, work well once I have stripped them, but after trying to wind the spring for a while the movement works rotate when the stem is turned. which would cause the hands to move. I checked the gear on the keyless works, no bevel, or decreeable profile,  but I have also tried inserting it both ways with no difference. Im dreading getting to the balance as this is also bound to be a real pig, the way this one is going. 

I feel like I am just going around in circles with this watch and its very frustrating. I feel like I have taken this watch apart a thousand times now. 

 

Any other ideas as to what could be going on? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi yes have tried this, but it still won't work when the whole watch is back together in one piece. it was my late fathers watch (he just passed a few months ago) orginally I was repairing it as a birthday gift, but now want to get it back and running so I can wear it to have something of his with me most days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Akuchanny said:

Hi yes have tried this, but it still won't work when the whole watch is back together in one piece. it was my late fathers watch (he just passed a few months ago) orginally I was repairing it as a birthday gift, but now want to get it back and running so I can wear it to have something of his with me most days. 

So, first things first: have you confirmed that the barrel arbor is hooking the spring hook by holding the barrel stationary and turning the projecting barrel arbor with tweezers or a pin vice?

Edited by rodabod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm working on one of these at the moment - just fitted a new balance staff today.

I always take a pic of the mainspring to see which way it winds- this is the correct way 

WIN_20181026_17_22_37_Pro.thumb.jpg.86b54f71c791e11edc6e39f69c4f6c2f.jpg

I have other pictures I took during disassembly should you need any help.

It's a straightforward movement - there's nothing unusual about the keyless or motion works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...