Jump to content

Help identifying movement


Recommended Posts

Just a quickie, I bought a practice piece the other day and would like to identify the movement if possible. There is a marking on the balance cock. I’ve found a list of marks but can’t see this one on there... so my question is what’s the best way to find a movement type (other than just experience)? Is there a good resource online anywhere?

 

This is the one in question.

604468768d338c2664531bc6e4c91a8f.jpg

09b3a2ab4a4acfde100e531c29b88704.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the watch has no obvious markings usually near or around the balance makers, will put their mark and calibre number 

If the watch has no such markings then to identify watch movements it is almost always easier to get a positive identification from the dial side of the movement because this would reveal the keyless works of the watch, these are often described as the fingerprint of a movement because they are unique to individual watch movement manufacturers, so uncasing the movement and removing the dial and hands to reveal these is the best way to go.

It can be very difficult to identify makers of movements from bridge layout because so many different watch manufacturers used layouts that are almost identical to look at 

The parts such as the setting lever and bridge can then be checked in reference books such as Paulson, Bestfit, Catalogue Official, and  Flume, these books where supplied by parts suppliers or makers as an aid to watchmakers  so they could order the correct parts for watches

There are also web based data bases such as "Ranftt" I'm pretty sure the movement you have is made by A.Schild  possibly a 984

Edited by wls1971
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, will have the dial off later after work then. So the keyless is the fingerprint? Didn’t know that so excellent!
Thanks for the good advice as always.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the prize goes to.... @wis1971 !!

I finally had a few minutes and popped off the dial side. And stamped on there is AS984 so I didn’t need the keyless fingerprint after all.

Thanks all, I learned something here which is what it’s all about!

 

fd12e99ecbf5668d50c46d7a9e34e18c.jpg&key=5aa57e17e2b8881193a1bbf4c8c7fa6281137e7a394e94435103babef1b1b841

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...