Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I came across an old tank style watch where the movement must be front loaded as there’s no case back to remove, the movement sits deep in the hollowed casing.

 

I have limited experience from split stems. I have encountered one where the stem ended in a ”hook” and I could slide out the movement by finding the correct turning angle for the crown.

 

This one doesn’t seem to work that way... I have attached a photo showing where the stem goes into the casing and besides the stem being of wider diameter than usual, there’s also what appears like slots on opposite sides that I suppose may indicate where the stem can separate?

 

I have tried to pull the crown hard but nothing happens and I’m afraid something may break.

 

I would appreciate some advice here and if it’s just brute force that counts...

 

/Bsoderlingb695c9e398b24e0b766e03d605d2993d.jpg

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Hi Chopin, that was for sure speedy response :-),

And right you are, I tried a pair of wire cutters with steep edges under the crown and off it came...

Photo is attached. Pretty nice movement, don’t you think? And actually ticking with some determination.

Thanks!
f642977e1a3d26e3f44fbcf036a21992.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

In the first photo, the setting lever spring is broken. Just wondering if the broken bit is wedged and is preventing the two piece stem from disengaging.

Posted

Thanks oldhippy, good thought but not the case as you can in the recent posting.

On setting lever springs, I find these to be very often gone on the old-timers I through myself at. Luckily the watch isn’t really depending on this ”feature” and I most often accept it for a fact as chasing up the correct part can be both endless and, if I find the part, expensive

Again thanks for all input!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

These crowns do indeed come out with difficulty but then again it's better than having a crown slip off while simply adjusting the time.

Indeed that is a lovely little movement and it sure looks to be of, more or less, high quality. What is it ?

You can use pliers or really thick tweezers but you can try and put something between the metal and the teeth of the tool that you use to protect the metal.

Edited by Chopin
Posted

The dial says ”Mowy” but there’s no id visible anywhere on the movement 240bd77174dd9a534d3f376dce87d2ae.jpgso I presume it’s a ”generic” of some kind.

What intrigued me was the rather elaborate casing design with all its bits an pieces... phota attached.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Chopin said:

I can't tell from the photo what we're dealing with here but some stems and crowns are male/female type.

Longines-Admiral-4.jpg

   the 2 part stem as pictured above is the standard for the front loader vintage wrist watch.  use an old pair of tweezers to apply an even pressure when prying it off.  new watches may be different.  vin

Posted
18 hours ago, bsoderling said:

Hi Chopin, that was for sure speedy response :-),

And right you are, I tried a pair of wire cutters with steep edges under the crown and off it came...

Photo is attached. Pretty nice movement, don’t you think? And actually ticking with some determination.

Thanks!
f642977e1a3d26e3f44fbcf036a21992.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Whats the size of that movement? It's either a FHF or a ETA i think. 

Posted
19 hours ago, bsoderling said:

The dial says ”Mowy” but there’s no id visible anywhere on the movement 240bd77174dd9a534d3f376dce87d2ae.jpgso I presume it’s a ”generic” of some kind.

What intrigued me was the rather elaborate casing design with all its bits an pieces... phota attached.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    the case appears to be a Wyler.  vin

Posted

Have two "Wyler" movements here. wonder if any of the can be the same. Has no markings on them . Only that one of them has a Wyler dial. 

Posted

Hi and thanks for all the interesting info.

Wyler is an unknown for me. Will google a bit to catch up.

The movement baseplate measures 17,5 x 26 mm.

I have attached a photo of the dial. Have seen better but also a lot worse :-)





a33c4b29c436e3b75138d971253266b8.jpg




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Indeed....found a Wyler thread on watchuseek that talks about a close to identical watch.

The movement is mentioned as MST 312 in the thread. Any info on that is appreciated.

The one I got has some kind of shock proof add-on though, so maybe it’s somewhat younger?

I presume the ”wy” in ”Mowy” is there to indicate a sub-brand to Wyler. There seems to have been variations on that theme at the time.

I´ll make sure to post the final result of my efforts when done with the service and clean-up.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 1. I think the pivots look pretty good and I wouldn't worry about wear. 2. Yes, I think the hole jewels should come out for cleaning, complete with their spring setting. I don't have experience with Rolex but I've seen this spring type setting in another movement. They may be stuck in with old dried oil. 3. Yes, I think the overcoil is out of shape.
    • Yes, I'm looking at this option. I have a good friend from childhood who happens to be a goldsmith, and he would certainly be able to tackle the second hole to my specifications. I usually avoid this path because, since he deals with gold pieces, every time he stops to help me with "frugal" parts, he is objectively losing money. I agree with you. Even though I couldn't justify paying this much for the set (they only sell the whole set or the sole case tube), I understand the price tag. The trouble with this particular stem set is that the most common use case for it is the Technos Skydiver, a watch whose price certainly justifies 220 USD for a brand-new stem set.   I have messaged them only on the surface, without specifying my needs. They already stated that they don't sell the single female part, only the full set. What I still don't get is the need for a second hole. Is it supposed to be some sort of regulation, meaning that I can fit the head of the male part in any of the two holes to adjust the pressure of the spring? Does this mean that a single-hole female part has a chance to work with my setup? I'll later test this hypothesis while continuing the assembly of the movement. Some photos are attached. Can you judge this bracelet? It was dirt cheap (4 USD), genuine leather, wife's choice. I have just realized my dial is upside down. lol
    • Hello from chilly Brazil! I just bought a couple of watches and this watch came with them. While perhaps not worth much I'd like to try to find out something about it. Googling comes up with with the name Gerald Genta, and I see from internet searches he's made some nice designs (perhaps an understatement)! Also some cartoon designs but I can't find anything like this anywhere, so most likely not his!  Googling Royama I see that some famous people liked his watches and also the Royama watches. Two questions; 1. Can anybody tell me anything about this watch and its background? 2. How to get the base off to let down the main spring which is fully wound. I gently tried prying it but nothing, I see there is a button but have no idea if it is functional for removing the back or anything else. Screwed back maybe? I really don't want to break the back or the watch with too much pressure and haven't looked up the properties of Grilamid!   Probably not much of a watch but it peaked my curiosity and I hope somebody might be able to help? The auctioneer sold it as a psychedelic acrylic 1960/70 Royama watch overwound! All the best...Jules
    • What do you use as pivot drills @nevenbekriev?
×
×
  • Create New...