Jump to content

New to watch repair from NC, seeking help with dial!

handwind

By handwind
in Watch Repairs Help & Advice

 Share

Recommended Posts

handwind New Member

handwind

Posted
Posted

Hi all, I'm from NC and new to watch repair as a hobby and very excited about it. Just opened up my first watch in fact...and immediately ran into trouble! To practice, I decided to get a few old mechanical watches (no day/date or any other complications) that were cheap but working. That way, I figured, I could take them apart, put them back together, learn how they work and, if the worked after getting them back together, then I'd know I put them back together correctly since they worked before taking apart. That was the grand plan. The reality turns out to be different! I started with a "Sears" watch with a 7 jewel Japanese movement. I was able to take the case back off, let down the mainspring, pull the stem, remove the movement, put the stem back in, and then remove the hands. Next step, as I understand it, is to remove the dial. This is where I'm running into trouble. I saw many videos and explanations of how there are screws and/or 'feet' holding the dial to the movement. However, I'm not able to find these. The downside of choosing an unknown movement is that I cannot google instructions for that particular movement. It just says "Sears Roebuck", "50C" and "Japan" on it, LOL. At the risk of sounding stupid, let me ask, are there examples when the dial is somehow permanently attached to the movement and doesn't come off? If not, will you more knowledgeable folks help me figure how to get the dial off? I'm including pictures below. Thank you in advance!

72AD90E1-5FA4-45F0-989D-4B9928906F78.jpeg

385B59CC-F924-4BEC-A626-B3D79DCBD028.jpeg

6E166AE0-A421-4FE5-84E7-C6FFD4092376.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ecodec WRT Addict

ecodec

Posted
Posted

Hi Handwind, I do not know this movement but there are normally two retaining screws that go thru the edge of the movement to secure the feet. They are round the circumference about 170 deg. apart. Slacken them then the face will come off (hopefully). I hope my comments are of help. Regards, Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marc Distinguished Member

Marc

Posted
Posted

5ae2d82e701f1_searsr.thumb.jpg.f06ab758b753ad8b14247eda53161ae7.jpg

I don't know the movement but I have circled the relevant bits.

You can see the dial feet poking through and held in place by a bevelled eccentric. If you turn the eccentrics with a screw driver they will release the dial feet and the dial will be liberated.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
vinn3 Distinguished Member

vinn3

Posted
Posted

Handwind;  welcome to the forum.   some wrist or pocket have the same "rotating wedge" type to grasp the "dial" feet.   some vintage watches have 3 set screws on the dial edge of the front plate.  it is a better idea if they don't rust in.  i don't know about the new watches.     good luck,  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites
handwind New Member

handwind

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi all, an update on my first watch disassembly. Taking your advice, I was able to remove the dial. All of the components then came off easily. Then I began putting them back together. I thought I had put them back together properly, but the watch doesn't work! I should say that I wasn't surprised given this is my first project and I'm trying to learn how mechanical watches work by observing this one. So there's a lot of learning-by-doing going on, of course along with reading on the internet and a good amount of youtube videos. Here's what's going on now... would love your advice...


Initially, when I took everything apart, the mainspring let-down was not easy. Even if I held the click away from the ratchet wheel, the let down was very very slow. Perhaps something was the matter before I even opened up the watch...it was running, but only if wound AND shaken... (btw, it's a hand-wind-only... not automatic). Anyhow, when I was taking out the mainspring barrel (which I did not open), the arbor fell out. When reassembling it, I just pushed it back into the barrel based on the pictures I had taken to determine the 'right side up'. So perhaps something to do with the MS barrel is my issue... However...

Once I was done putting it all back together, the watch doesn't work..  BUT.. the mainspring winds BETTER than before and when I reopened it and tried let-down again to re-check everything, the letdown now is MUCH better like it's supposed to be based on what I've seen in online videos.... which makes me think that the MS Barrel/arbor is not my issue because winding seems to be going fine. My only doubt is that I'm seeing stuff about how the arbor is supposed to be 'hooked' to the mainspring...but I don't see any hook on my arbor. It's very symmetrical and cylindrical with no protrusions....Am I right in drawing this conclusion that the fact that the wind and letdown are strong means that the arbor is in the right place? 

If so, I'll look for other problems... hahah

Thank you in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
handwind New Member

handwind

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also, could someone please tell me whether I have an 'indirect' or 'direct' seconds set up here? This is a picture I took before disassembly. Watch was working fine before as I noted above. Trying to get it back together now. Thank you!!

A9DB27B7-F717-450E-8997-3DFC61B28B6B.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
handwind New Member

handwind

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I figured out most of what I needed by doing online research. However, the watch is lost. When I put it together, it doesn't work and I'm not sure why! All the gears, etc. seem engaged. It's a very cheap old movement so specific information on it is hard to come by. Regardless, I've learned 10x more about watch movements than I knew before. So I'm happy about that. Without any loss of enthusiasm about this defeat with my first watch project, I'll be opening up a Seiko 7009 movement next weekend. Thanks all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kkramme
      Coil for old Seiko Credor -- 4002920

      By Kkramme · Posted

      Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Kkramme
      Rare Seiko 5actus Watch??!! With a lot🤪🤔😲

      By Kkramme · Posted

      Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • Mercurial
      Smit

      By Mercurial · Posted

      I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • GuyMontag
      FHF70 balance jewels settings

      By GuyMontag · Posted

      It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • markr
      Sterling fusee info wanted.

      By markr · Posted

      Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...