Jump to content

Lecoultre 8 day Memovox desk clock ( alarm). Production dates


Eckehardt

Recommended Posts

I just bought this Lecoultre 8 day alarm memovox clock ( meaning voice of memory). What was the production date of these little jems. I know they started in 1950 for memovox watches . This has the 219 caliber movement in it. When did they introduce this movement and clock? Do they have exact production date records? ( 7 jewels) works great keeps good time. I like the stopwork of the winding mechanism and the alarm limiter. Here are some pics. I only payed $50 for this Gem at a flea market.

20180128_191644.jpg

20180128_191730.jpg

20180128_191745.jpg

20180127_161859.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, oldhippy said:

The only info I can find is this. 1950 Creation of the Memovox, calibers 489 and 814.

 

I can tell you for a Jaeger-LeCoultre this is a very poor movement. No jewels to the train, just 7 jewels to the escapement.

 

Yeah most post war LeCoultres had 7 jewel movements unadjusted for a short period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/01/2018 at 3:59 AM, oldhippy said:

 

 

So I spoke with the vendor that sold it to me, which is an interesting story. When his father bought it, it was a promotional item ( demo or introduction model to the memovox). The vendor told me that most demo or promotional models came with 7 jewels. If sales went well they would keep producing these with upgrades. He also showed me a black cockpit Le- Coultre, also 7 jewels which seems odd. One would figure military grade clocks would have 15 or more jewels. But my clock was purchased by the vendors father back in 1951. It came in a box but not in a leather case. He said it's bern serviced twice since that time. The last time was in 2015. 

Edited by Eckehardt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
43 minutes ago, Eckehardt said:

I still think the movement still has an ingenious design. Using the Stackfreed type system for winding ( 1500s era) before the fusee. This also prevents the escapement from Galloping while winding it to the end. 

Funny when you think of it. Using an old system in what was at its time a modern day clock. Makes you wonder what was wrong with the design of the movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The memovox was probably in its prototype phase in the 1950s. They probably wanted to make it more compact they probably used 7 jewels at first to test out the market. It's an alarm clock that probably gets banged around a lot so they left the jewels unadjusted. Keeping it basic simple. Why throw 15 jewels in a type of clock that takes abuse and if it doesn't sell well. So when the look caught the public eye and it sold. Le-coultre possibly refined the movement and made alarm watches with more jewels and better performance. To this day they still use the memovox dial in some of their watches and time pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I know the movement came in both 7 jewels and 15 jewel version, the 7 jewel versions where always sold under the lecoultre name and the 15 jewel versions sold only under the Jaeger Lecoultre name. They where probably made to a price with the bulk of the Lecoultre ones being sold into the American markets.

It seems to me it was seen as a clear seperation of the two nanes with Lecoultre marked clocks being seen as a cheaper alternative to the Jaeger lecoultre marked clocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the hole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
    • The description there is exactly how it's done, and it's very well written!
×
×
  • Create New...