Jump to content

Principle of the Bergeon 1A (cap jewel) automatic oiler


Jimbo

Recommended Posts

Hi Kids, 

So I'm still wondering how, when you oil the cap jewel when installed in the hole-jewel setting, you don't end up losing a bunch of oil on the inside (i.e. balance side) of the hole jewel, given that the viscosity of the oil makes the drop wider than the hole jewel opening. Does this happen to you?

Do you just insert it and push, or do you prime it first with a retraction, or what? Or retract first, insert it retracted, and then release? But doesn't that create the same problem as the end pin carries the oil through the hole? I can't see that the sheath fits through the hole of the jewel.

Thanks, 

Jim

Edited by Jimbo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make sure oiler is clean, I always dip it in rodico first to get rid of any excess oil already on the end and then just put the end of oiler in the hole keeping oiler straight(90 degrees) and flick the button, job done, pull the oiler straight out. Hold the setting, bridge or cock with tweezers or peg wood to stop it moving as you pull the oiler straight out, this stops the oil from going on the outside of the hole.

With most shock settings it's easier to do it with the cap jewel and shell out of the setting which would be out anyway for the cleaner.

For Rolex escape wheel endstones it's done whilst endstones are in the watch(take them out for the cleaning machine though), this is because there's no outer shell that comes out with the endstone. The same goes for older Watch's with a balance endstones that doesn't come out. I would always remove the balance from the cock if there's no room to get underneath without touching the hairspring with the oiler though.

These oilers take a bit of getting used to but once set up properly you should be able to get the perfect round bubble to cover 2/3rds of the surface area of the jewel which is about perfect. The faster you pull the button the less oil comes out, for a small jewel flick it quickly, for a larger one do it a bit slower or flick it twice.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will always get a little bit of oil around the entrance to the hole but oil will end up there anyway once the balance pivots are sat in place, the oil will be sucked out slightly which is what is supposed to happen, that's why the bubble sometimes shrinks a bit when it's been running a while because it's run down/up the pivot.

 

IMG_0951.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...