Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Once I ordered a "balance complete" and got less than what I expected.  I still don't know what the term really means.

Everything down from the end stud, included.

Posted
10 minutes ago, jdm said:

Everything down from the end stud, included.

So, neither the balance bridge, nor the associated jewels included.  I think that was the point of my confusion.  The ebay vendor said "balance complete" and I got the complete balance assembly up to the stud AND the bridge, but missing jewel.  In this case, the bridge was just a bonus.

Posted
20 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

So, neither the balance bridge, nor the associated jewels included.  I think that was the point of my confusion.  The ebay vendor said "balance complete" and I got the complete balance assembly up to the stud AND the bridge, but missing jewel.  In this case, the bridge was just a bonus.

When people are scrapping watches terminology isn't exactly what it's supposed to be.

If the part is brand-new balance complete is the complete assembly of the balance wheel hairspring exactly what JDM said ready to go into the watch. Unless of course it's a vintage and then it's going to require some adjustments.

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

The reason they don't mention it is because they don't know. In a world of absolutes most people just don't grasp the problem of American pocket watch parts. Even the people selling the parts have no idea.

The only people care about all of this are people were trying to repair things and pondering why things don't fit then take the time to study the material guides to find out what the problem is.

For instance Elgin if you ordered a dozen staffs at one time from them if you didn't specify a pivots size they would give you an assortment of pivots sizes. Which means of somebody is selling staffs out of the assortment unless they've checked the pivots size they have no idea what size they are.

That addition to the JDM suggestion above getting a watchmaker's lathe s another option for refinishing pivots. Also just a really good tool to have if you're working on vintage watches.

I'm just a beginner 

 

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

The reason they don't mention it is because they don't know. In a world of absolutes most people just don't grasp the problem of American pocket watch parts. Even the people selling the parts have no idea.

The only people care about all of this are people were trying to repair things and pondering why things don't fit then take the time to study the material guides to find out what the problem is.

For instance Elgin if you ordered a dozen staffs at one time from them if you didn't specify a pivots size they would give you an assortment of pivots sizes. Which means of somebody is selling staffs out of the assortment unless they've checked the pivots size they have no idea what size they are.

That addition to the JDM suggestion above getting a watchmaker's lathe s another option for refinishing pivots. Also just a really good tool to have if you're working on vintage watches.

The vendor in this case is a well known (to the vintage watch hobbyist market) supplier. I think he nows his stuff, but has a general attitude of you get what you ask for, nothing more nothing less. Like I said, my lesson learned that I've got to invest a lot me time researching this stuff before launching off into doing it. 

I'd love to invest in the Jacot tool, there are lots of them on eBay. Same with a lathe. But I'm spaced constrained and experience short at this point so these two items should probably be put on my list for next year.

Levine98 

Posted
18 hours ago, jdm said:

You can do even better than that, budget permitting, get a watchmaker's micrometer (absolute best is Feintaster JFA, $$$), Jacot tool, bow and pivot file (again $$$). You will be able to shorten and resize pivots as needed, and will have surpassed many self-called watchmakers that can't fix anything without click-and-get parts. 

JDM beat me to it.  He is right about this.  I've made adjustments to staff pivots in my Jacot tool, and it has helped me quite a few times.  The most common repair problem with antique watches, pocket watches in particular, seems to be a broken balance staff.  My Jacot tool and burnishing files, and my staking set get used more often than I first thought back when I was starting out.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KarlvonKoln said:

JDM beat me to it.  He is right about this.  I've made adjustments to staff pivots in my Jacot tool, and it has helped me quite a few times.  The most common repair problem with antique watches, pocket watches in particular, seems to be a broken balance staff.  My Jacot tool and burnishing files, and my staking set get used more often than I first thought back when I was starting out.

Funny you should mention the staking set. I picked one up on eBay two weeks ago (a rather nice "Favorite" brand in very good shape, for a fair price from what I can tell) and have used it several times already.

  • Like 1
Posted

Well on balance this has been quite frustrating.

I got a 861 NS riveted to a balance wheel, but now cannot affix the double roller to the staff re: it looks like the roller shoulder on the staff is too small (it measures 0.60mm instead of what I believe should be 0.63 mm). So the double roller just drops to the roller seat on the hub. I tried to close the double roller hole but it is too hard and I don't think pounding on it is very good for the roller jewel.

Besides finding another 861 NS staff and starting over, any suggestions on how to use what I have?

 

Thanks

Posted
1 hour ago, Levine98 said:

(it measures 0.60mm instead of what I believe should be 0.63 mm).

According the specifications I'm looking at it's supposed to be .60 mm.  What did the old staff measure to be?

Posted

great point. i have three old staffs (861 OS). They all measure .60mm taking the new style measurement again i get .058-.059.

More to the point, when I fit the double roller on the old staffs, there is a gap between the roller and the roller seat. When I fit it to the new staff, it definitely sits flat on the seat.

So I guess I have to chalk this up to a poorly manufactured staff (I don't know if it was NOS or someone's handy work).

Posted
14 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

According the specifications I'm looking at it's supposed to be .60 mm.  What did the old staff measure to be?

See below. I could be misreading these however since I'm new at this. 

701351338_ScreenShot2022-02-18at8_55_08AM.thumb.png.4a5ab5274a46a8eb5da2e7edd978c206.png

1767690469_ScreenShot2022-02-18at8_51_33AM.thumb.png.3dc3f55a3ad52f50b03b4654ccb5d65e.png

Posted
7 hours ago, Levine98 said:

See below. I could be misreading these however since I'm new at this. 

Actually what I was originally asking was what is the size of your original staff? What I was hoping for was the micrometer size of your original staff and the micrometer size of your replacement staff. This is why it's always importance to measure the old versus new to avoid having a staff in the watch that's now the wrong size or doesn't agree with the original staff

then is looking at the book that I normally look at and it's very clear the size is 0.60. But then I was looking in the Elgin material catalog and it gives two separate sizes. I look at another source and its 0.60 that seems to be very popular size. So typical with American pocket watch staffs there seems to be a confusion.

 

Elgin 861 staff information problems.JPG

Elgin 861 staff measurements issue.JPG

Elgin 861 balance staff issue.JPG

Elgin 16 size staffs sizing issues.JPG

Elgin bestfit staff 861 sizing issues.JPG

Posted

First, thank you for all of your patience and help.

There is no question that the new style staff I received measures less than .60mm at the roller table on the balance staff. I am pretty confident it is new style since it measures about 5.30 in pivot to pivot plus the shape of the new style is distinct from what I can tell. So this balance staff is kaput (riveted to a balance wheel and no where to go).

I received another staff today from another supplier (Otto Frie). It appears to be old style (measures close to 5.17mm end to end) and has a roller shaft of .62. I went ahead and tried to rivet it to one of my salvage balance wheels and ...let's just say that this has been a frustrating day re: pretty sure the balance wheel hole is oversized from having the staffs extracted with a K&D device (I don't have a lathe). Bottom line is the shaft is riveted but not firmly.

So a lot of learning today, which is where I would expect to be given I've only been doing this for a month. It is of course very frustrated to learn all of this at the expense ($$) of materials, but I need to keep my expectations reasonable as this is complicated stuff and the source information is imperfect and very confusing.

Any thoughts on how to tighten the balance wheel holes (I'm assuming using rounded stakes, but I think I'll ask before I go punching the remaining balance wheels I have salvaged).

Again, thank you for your help. 

Jay (Levine98)

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You shared this test with me a few months back on a Hamilton project and so I had checked this watch to find the pins were still equally spaced. Their screw slots were undamaged and very tight hard to move so maybe no one has messed with them before. I can't work on it much today but I did measure the fork slot again and it seems like 0.44 is the right size. I measure the jewel that had been installed at just 0.42. would an undersized too narrow impulse jewel impact the impulse drastically? I ask because I have had it at a state where flipping the fork manually with a tool would unlock some of the time, but the balance was never capable of unlocking.
    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
×
×
  • Create New...