Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

I have a watch with a very basic waterproof crown with a flush post/hidden gasket. 

I've read elsewhere that the best thing to do is to simply replace these types of crowns.

However, I'd like to somehow waterproof my watch without replacing this crown.

I'm (likely naively) wondering if i can replace the post to a japanese-style post to waterproof, or if I can use extenders and somehow sandwich a gasket between the thicker parts.

So in brief:

1. Is there a way to remove/replace the existing crown post? (I've seen crown posts being sold but am not sure how that works)

2. Are there any other options for waterproofing this type of crown?

Thank you!

Posted

It would help if you could tell us what the watch is and post some pictures, then tell us a little about your knowledge / ability. Some watch manufacturers have unique crown types which are difficult to replace. Some use very standardised parts. For some it is possible to get new replacements, for others it’s almost impossible. 

Posted

Here are some photos! I attempted to take photos of the inside of the crown but its proving to be rather difficult.

I'm a complete novice, but I am willing to take this to a skilled watchmaker or slowly take the time to learn/practice to get this to work.

This is a very cheap but personal quartz Wenger Swiss Army (70181) that I'd like to try and keep original externally.

I'd like to be able to waterproof this crown without needing to get a new crown altogether.

Is there a way (I'm open unorthodox approaches) to add gaskets on this to restore the 100M water resistance?

Crown.jpg

Crown2.jpg

Tube.jpg

Posted

With some bent pick, clean out what remains of the gasket inside the crown, try to measure it the best you can and order a replacement from Cousins UK. Or replace the entire crown. There isn't anything else that you can practically do.

Posted

Agree with Oldhippy just replace the crown. If you want to truly waterproof the watch you would have to change the pipe to a screw down pipe & screw down crown. 

Posted
1 minute ago, clockboy said:

If you want to truly waterproof the watch you would have to change the pipe to a screw down pipe & screw down crown. 

That is for a diver's watch really. Screw down doesn't do waterproofing, it's just a safety device to prevent accidental pulling of the crown. Good waterproofing can be had with o-rings in the crown, as in this case, or on the stem.

Posted

Depends on how many atmospheres the watch is going to be subjected too. All truly waterproof watches must have a screw down crown. The weakest part with regards to water ingress is the crown & pipe. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Depends on how many atmospheres the watch is going to be subjected too. All truly waterproof watches must have a screw down crown. The weakest part with regards to water ingress is the crown & pipe. 

Yes, screw down crown is a requirement for a diver's watch, for which there is an international certification, ISO 6425

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diving_watch

However, as mentioned above, a screwed crown in itself does not have any waterproofing capability. You can try that yourself, remove gaskets on a screw down watch and do a pressure testing.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, clockboy said:

The screw down crown adds pressure to the seals thats how they work better than just a seal.

Not really. If you think about it, the screw down crown threading is just a retention mechanism. Seals are in between stem and inside pendant tube, and/or crown and and the outside of the pendant tube. They are not influenced by the screw down as it's "force vector" does not change their position. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, jdm said:

Not really. If you think about it, the screw down crown threading is just a retention mechanism. Seals are in between stem and inside pendant tube, and/or crown and and the outside of the pendant tube. They are not influenced by the screw down as it's "force vector" does not change their position. 

If the design of the crown incorporates a gasket that locates between the end of the case tube and the underside of the crown (Rolex Twinlock & Triplock, Vostok Amphibia) then screwing down the crown most definitely improves the seal as it increases the compression on the gasket.

http://blog.watchdoctor.biz/2016/10/09/rolex-screw-crown-works/

image.png.fad6fa1a52beed3d39dbd87d28cc9e75.png

Posted

Meanwhile, back at the original question, I think it’s important to establish the objective, and then clarify the options and outcomes. The OP describes an ambition to get back to the original 100m waterproofness, so let’s look at that.

JDM’s answer above is about the extent of it.

If you can find an accrediter repairer who has a Wenger parts account, they may be able to obtain a new crown with the Wenger logo on it.  They will fit the crown using the correct grade of loctite to attach it to the stem, if necessary, they can replace the case tube, they will lubricate the stem and seal with the correct lubricants (both different), refit the stem and a new caseback seal (also lubricated), and then pressure test to confirm all is good.  My guess is that this would cost £70 to £100.  If the correct crown is not available then a similar style generic one could be fitted and the cost could be a little less.

A quick google search suggests that someone like InTime might be able to do this.

It is unlikely you will find a repairer who is willing to fiddle around with trying to replace the crown seal.

If you want to tackle this yourself then you have the choice of trying to find a replacement o-ring as JDM describes, or a generic crown. Loctite is optional, but adds security against the crown coming off, so I would reccomend. A pin vice is preferable to hold the stem, but smooth jawed pliers would do for a one-off. Silicone grease for the seal is recommended, but you could get away with not greasing the stem. So you should be able to do all this for around £20. You may need to shorten the stem or pack the hole in the crown if it’s a little short... read the sticky thread on fitting a new stem. Let’s assume you don’t want to spend hundreds or more on a pressure tester, so you will be guessing that all is good when you've finished.

You pays your money and takes your choice.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Marc said:

If the design of the crown incorporates a gasket that locates between the end of the case tube and the underside of the crown (Rolex Twinlock & Triplock, Vostok Amphibia) then screwing down the crown most definitely improves the seal as it increases the compression on the gasket.

Correct. But Twinlock and Triplelock are the (patented) very best of crown lock mechanisms, with features not found on the large majority of other watches, for example the extremely popular Seiko divers (O-ring on the stem), or IWC and other Swiss watches (O-ring inside the the crown). These others make about 99% of screw down crown watches ever made, from that my point above explained.

Edited by jdm


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see. And is there a possibility to convert it to a springless system by replacing it with a standard split stem model?
    • Sharpening gauge.   I found the easiest side to do was the safety roller as the roller table laid flat on a block provided stability.  The other way requires a specific stump for the roller and pin to sit in, but may also grip better way.
    • Yes, the problem isn't so much with the 'background' radiation but inhaling or digesting loose flakes and dust that can become airborne.
    • The spring is so the crown pops out to the winding position when unscrewed.
    • Radium and the horrible story of the Radium Girls scares everyone - But there is also a lot of paranoia here.  I did a whole bunch of readings on a watch with Radium lume recently. My Geiger counter read 2µsv/h through the crystal with the sensor part of the Geiger counter right on top of the watch.  This measurement dropped off to the normal background rate of 0.18µsv/h as soon at the Geiger counter is just a few cms away. Measuring from the back of the watch and there is virtually no increase.  The rate went up to 5µsv/h from the dial and hands when the movement was removed from the case. To put this in perspective a Frankfurt to New York flight would give you about 50µsv of exposure and a chest x-ray about 100µsv.  Norwegian labour law states “The limit value for workers over the age of 18 years is set to 20 mSv per calendar year.” - that is the equivalent of 400 flights across the Atlantic! I will however point out at this point it is important that you don’t ingest the radium from the watch! One of the worst things you can do is scrape the radium off the dials and create radioactive dust that you could breath in! That being said… If for each radium lumed watch you work on you spend 15 minutes getting the movement out of the case and the dial and hands off and then another 15 minutes at the end putting the dial and hands back on your exposure would be less than 2.5µsv  Once you have the hands and dial off they can go in a box and put safely out of the way (probably good practice for any watch!). I believe the risks are negligible If you take precautions such as wearing a mask and gloves and wiping your work surfaces down with a damp paper towel and disposing of the towel, gloves and mask once you are finished  
×
×
  • Create New...