Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

just taken the course and am investigating some watch repairs on scrap flee-market materials. It all started with my destroying of an Omega 601 by just wanting to remove a bit of dirt :-)

After forcefully attached the train-wheel bridge... i needed a new escapewheel ... so I learned a lot already and am happy to join the forum as well.

Greetings

Max

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Max, Don`t worry, I had a disaster with an Omega 552 movement. It had been botched up and never kept time. +2-3  mins per day. My Grandson who now owns what is left of it asked me if I would look at it !!. My Timegrapher condemned it. All over the place. ..::;;,,:::<>..,,,...::::''etc. Upon removing the rear cover I noticed that one leg of the incabloc spring was out of position and the end stone was moving. !!. I put the lyre spring back and it performed better. I made a cup of tea and returned to the bench to find the incabloc spring out of position again and the end stone gone !!!!!!. There is no doubt that the end stone was too small  yet this watch had run badly for some years. When I purchased it years ago it had been "serviced" so I was told. I then removed the balance carefully but the hair spring broke off at the bead. Must have been on it`s last legs. It is a Seamaster 300 Large triangle 1966 so could be quite valuable. Alas I cannot get any spares from Omega so it is back in the drawer until I am able to sort it if ever. The only failure I have had except a Citizen Eco drive with a day problem and needs a new rechargeable battery as well. My brother in laws !!. Thanks for the info and good wishes with the repairs. Regards, Mike.

Posted (edited)

Omega Seamaster 300. 552. 1966,  Hi Max. I am not giving up. I will re-spring the balance. Pin the hair spring into the stud "phew" and try to find a suitable end stone of the correct size. Hoping I have enough beat error adjustment ! Breguet spring.  More later. Regards, Mike.

Edited by ecodec
Posted

Greetings Max. You are from the home of watches where the very best are produced. There are lots of guys here who can advise & help you. Enjoy the forum. 

Posted

Hi Max, lots of knowledgeable people on this forum who are happy to help you, when I say lots of knowledgeable people I do not include myself !

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see. And is there a possibility to convert it to a springless system by replacing it with a standard split stem model?
    • Sharpening gauge.   I found the easiest side to do was the safety roller as the roller table laid flat on a block provided stability.  The other way requires a specific stump for the roller and pin to sit in, but may also grip better way.
    • Yes, the problem isn't so much with the 'background' radiation but inhaling or digesting loose flakes and dust that can become airborne.
    • The spring is so the crown pops out to the winding position when unscrewed.
    • Radium and the horrible story of the Radium Girls scares everyone - But there is also a lot of paranoia here.  I did a whole bunch of readings on a watch with Radium lume recently. My Geiger counter read 2µsv/h through the crystal with the sensor part of the Geiger counter right on top of the watch.  This measurement dropped off to the normal background rate of 0.18µsv/h as soon at the Geiger counter is just a few cms away. Measuring from the back of the watch and there is virtually no increase.  The rate went up to 5µsv/h from the dial and hands when the movement was removed from the case. To put this in perspective a Frankfurt to New York flight would give you about 50µsv of exposure and a chest x-ray about 100µsv.  Norwegian labour law states “The limit value for workers over the age of 18 years is set to 20 mSv per calendar year.” - that is the equivalent of 400 flights across the Atlantic! I will however point out at this point it is important that you don’t ingest the radium from the watch! One of the worst things you can do is scrape the radium off the dials and create radioactive dust that you could breath in! That being said… If for each radium lumed watch you work on you spend 15 minutes getting the movement out of the case and the dial and hands off and then another 15 minutes at the end putting the dial and hands back on your exposure would be less than 2.5µsv  Once you have the hands and dial off they can go in a box and put safely out of the way (probably good practice for any watch!). I believe the risks are negligible If you take precautions such as wearing a mask and gloves and wiping your work surfaces down with a damp paper towel and disposing of the towel, gloves and mask once you are finished  
×
×
  • Create New...