Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Haven`t used the forum for a while; not since attempting slow down my 1965 Tissot Seastar manual wind watch by replacing the balance spring, (with the help of this forum), cleaning and lubrication.  The only item I`ve not replaced is the mainspring. Can this effect the rate? it gains around an hour a day.     

Posted

This fault is not due to the mainspring but to the escapement. You should look at time grapher or equivalent applicattio to see if it reveals something more than a crazy fast rate.

Posted
Haven`t used the forum for a while; not since attempting slow down my 1965 Tissot Seastar manual wind watch by replacing the balance spring, (with the help of this forum), cleaning and lubrication.  The only item I`ve not replaced is the mainspring. Can this effect the rate? it gains around an hour a day.     




It should not affect the rate. If you're replacing it with something other than the exact part then it could under power which would give you a short power reserve and, if over powered, it would knock.

I would look into the balance wheel first. Well, I take it back, demagnetize always as first step and if still fast then check balance. The pins bust be shortening the hairspring way too much.

Cheers,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

The mainspring provides power to the escapement; a worn out mainspring will be underpowered which will result in low amplitude and potentially the watch running fast.  If the mainspring has been replaced recently this should not be an issue.

The best way to determine why the watch is running fast or slow is to get a reading from a timegrapher as @jdmsuggests.  The problem will most likely be in the escapement.

Posted

Most likely the escapement area is where the fault is. However it might be worth de-magnitsiing the movement as coils of the hairspring sticking together will make the watch run fast,

Posted

Thanks everyone for your suggestions/remedies.  Had another look at the balance spring and it looks as though the first part of the coil isn`t `bouncing` as it should between the regulator pins. My biggest problem is magnification; it looks so easy to rectify on the computer screen but I can`t view it sufficiently enough to see if it`s (the spring) centred correctly between the pins. 

I removed the balance assembly in an attempt to reshape the end of the spring but unfortunately managed to damage it beyond repair.  If I can source another balance spring (781-1), (ebay maybe?), I`ll attempt another go. The Seastar`s the only mechanical watch I have and with the tools and material bought, the cost is approaching the watch`s purchase price! 

I take my hat off to everyone who can successfully restore/repair watches: I`ve restored classic motorcycles all my life (as a hobby) but nothing has taxed me more than the work on the Tissot!

Thanks again.        

Posted
51 minutes ago, Tricati15 said:

I take my hat off to everyone who can successfully restore/repair watches: I`ve restored classic motorcycles all my life (as a hobby) but nothing has taxed me more than the work on the Tissot!

When much younger I've worked professionally on motorcycles, and I agree with you. That is why I'm amused when total beginners come here with the presumption that since they have some manual skills in whatever other field, it will be easy. And then you see that most of them disappear after a few postings.
Hope you can find a balance complete for your Tissot, now that you've learned how delicate an hairsping really is.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
    • Same Mike , same as I've always used.
    • Oh I didn't think of that.  I measured my roller jewel gauge with a screw micrometer and it is all over the place. The 46 measures at 49, 44 -> 46, 42 -> 43, 40 -> 40(!) on the nose, 38 -> 38, 36 -> 37.... So most of them are 0.01 to 0.02 larger than labeled but some of them are not so I have learned this gauge is unreliable and I need to measure it when I use it. Still my jewel is 42, my gauge at 44 (actual 46) just fits in the slot without binding so maybe I will try going up a size if I have one.
×
×
  • Create New...