Jump to content

Help with AS984 balance wheel shaft please


Recommended Posts

Hello. I'm new to repairing watching and still learning little by little thanks to the help I'm getting from here. I recently bought an old rotary sold as spares/repairs and wonder if you could give me some help please. I have diagnosed the problem (or at least one I can see so far) as being that the balance wheel will not rotate without clashing on surrounding metalwork. The balance wheel has a lot of movement both axially and radially, and, to my mind seems to be sitting far too low in the jewel hence the underside clashing on the adjacent metal work. Now, I have carefully removed the balance wheel/ hair spring/ cock assembly and I note the following which I hope you may be able to comment on:-

 

1. The lower jewel is installed with lubricant sink towards the shaft. All others in this movement seem to be installed with oil sink away from the shaft end (please see photo below). The jewel is the type which has a brass cover, shield and single retaining screw.

493075b0c9737277daf9393e287b278f.jpg

1f7e83cccea84350422dacd38085057d.jpg

 

2. I am suspicious that the shaft end which engages in said jewel may have worn or even snapped off as there is but a small pimple of small diameter shaft evident. Is this correct? Please see photo (excuse quality). I am unable to photograph it through risk of damaging the hair spring, but the shaft mating with the upper jewel does seem to be slightly longer longer.

 

127709ee1007265be71e590b7b723aba.jpg

 

Would very much like your comments as to whether the jewel is correctly installed and also if the shaft looks damaged. Thank you all in advance. [emoji6]

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yepp . That is a snapped pivot  You need a new balance. Send me a PM. I could help out there i think? 

Super. Thanks for your quick reply. I'm just going to work out how to send a pm and I will do so. I take it that means private message?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 


Super. Thanks for your quick reply. I'm just going to work out how to send a pm and I will do so. I take it that means private message?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I can take a look tomorrow if i have any balances for AS 984. And then send you a PM. Can take a fast look right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You almost there with your diagnosie of the problem, you have correctly identified that the balance has too much play and is not sitting right in the lower jewel that is because it has a broken lower pivot and needs replacing, but that would require the correct tools to replace, or the other option is replacing what would be termed the "balance complete", staff, balance, hairspring and roller as a complete unit. the jewel is a cap jewel and is held as you say in a holder held in place with the screw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your changing a balance complete you should not need specialist tools beyond screw drivers and tweezers if rogat63 hasnt got one available there are some listed on ebay,

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/AS-Complete-Balance-Cal-984-Part-721-/222463092761?hash=item33cbd56819:g:dWYAAOSwB-1Y45Bw

or you could find a donor movement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello WLS and many thanks for your reply. So the lower jewel is fitted correctly then? If the lower pivot has broken, I will need to strip every last screw to make sure all fragments are eliminated from the movement. That'll be fun. Hi does the pivot snap? Must take quite a shock I imagine?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hi does the pivot snap? Must take quite a shock I imagine?

Not really, considering that there is no anti-shock in your mov.t,
I suspect that when these became common, many watch repairers became.. upset.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...