Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I got this Omega 684 movement and it was keeping time to about 10 seconds a day but I've tested it now and it's gaining so much time and so out of beat the timegrapher is struggling to recognize it as a watch. I've poked the levers into every combination an it's still not working. What should I do now? Thanks for the help.

DSC_2659.thumb.JPG.b53a0edfb301f49f85722644d612d72b.JPG

Posted
3 minutes ago, Titanium said:

I got this Omega 684 movement and it was keeping time to about 10 seconds a day but I've tested it now and it's gaining so much time and so out of beat the timegrapher is struggling to recognize it as a watch. I've poked the levers into every combination an it's still not working. What should I do now? Thanks for the help.

DSC_2659.thumb.JPG.b53a0edfb301f49f85722644d612d72b.JPG

What happened between the first time and now? If it's gaining it could be magnetized or it could be oil on the hairspring. From the picture I can see the watch is running, but are the coils touching? Looks like they are. Check your hairspring coils.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Is the watch fully wound when you put it on timing machine and have you demagnetised it, is the hairspring flat and breathing properly and centred?

Edited by Tiktok
Posted

Are you sure the hairspring is between the 2 regulating pins on the regulating arm, if I remember correctly there is just 2 pins sticking down and the hairspring can actually jump out and rest against the wrong side of one of the pins, this would give an erratic reading.

Posted

It also looks like there is a hair from the incabloc setting towards the up side of the regulating arm, could this be hanging down and touching the hairspring or even trapped in the incabloc setting?

Posted
7 hours ago, Titanium said:

I got this Omega 684 movement and it was keeping time to about 10 seconds a day but I've tested it now and it's gaining so much time and so out of beat the timegrapher is struggling to recognize it as a watch

so in between 10 seconds a day and not being recognized what changed? Did it do it all by itself or was it the results of you pushing the levers wildly around?

So the beat adjustment lever is interesting in that there is no plus or minus. this means we are moving it in one direction if you moving too fast or you're not careful you can go past zero. Then very very tiny amounts of movement or you can be extremely far out of beat. Then the timing machine is averaging if you move too fast you can exceed its ability to read which are doing and once again you can go way beyond where you want to be very effortlessly.

so puzzling your picture is the regulator is so close to the stud it seems like it would be extremely slow? so it's very hard to tell in the picture I'm wondering if the terminal curve is where it's supposed to be? If you get carried away with moving the levers it's always possible to bend a hairspring. It almost looks like the spring may be off-center. If it's off-center far enough which I can't tell from the photograph it may be it's bumping into the back side of the stud or even the regulator pins. That would make it run very very fast.

 

omega 683 684.JPG

Posted

It is for sure a hairspring issue. Either it has become magnetised, distorted or oil/dirt is causing the coils to to stick together. The regulator is way to close to the end stud arm so it might be way of beat or the regulator has been moved to far. I suspect your poking around has put it a mile out of beat so that arm is the one to be moved. I suggest before any more moves use very good magnification to inspect the coils

Posted
6 hours ago, clockboy said:

It is for sure a hairspring issue. Either it has become magnetised, distorted or oil/dirt is causing the coils to to stick together. The regulator is way to close to the end stud arm so it might be way of beat or the regulator has been moved to far. I suspect your poking around has put it a mile out of beat so that arm is the one to be moved. I suggest before any more moves use very good magnification to inspect the coils

I agree. Look at the coil. Then deal with the regulator arm. As many have mentioned, it is too close to the end stud.

 

J

Posted

Poor thing looks like it could well benefit from a really good service, cleaning and relub. Those pics make it look stinking dirty, some parts have even gone green!

During this work, the fault will prob be self evident...

Posted
6 minutes ago, Alastair said:

Poor thing looks like it could well benefit from a really good service, cleaning and relub. Those pics make it look stinking dirty, some parts have even gone green!

During this work, the fault will prob be self evident...

Come now @Alistair, stinking dirty?!? it's not all that bad.... is it?

J

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Alastair said:

Maybe its the pics, but to me--yes, it does look terribly dirty!

Omega plates, wheels etc--Sparkle when clean...

Yeah I agree, Omega makes beautiful copper-plated workings that gleam when clean. But Titanium is a newcomer, and to him this movement probably doesn't look that bad. As you said, maybe it's the pics.

J

Edited by noirrac1j
Posted

It could do with a good service but I think even when cleaned the "green bits" on the edge of the plates I think he will find won't look much better, it looks like the oscillating wieght bearing/axle is worn (or at some point has been) and as it's been turning with too much play it has been catching the plates and damaged them, now the plating on the edge of the plates has worn off it won't ever look sparkling.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...