Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Guys, I am about to repair a Waltham 1902 P.S. Bartlett Pocket Watch and would like to know the history behind that grade of watch. I currently understand that PS Bartlett ran the plate department for Waltham and left in 1865 to start and work for Elgin. The PS Bartlett Grades started at Waltham in 1883 ish so I am interested in why this grade started? Or any other interesting information.e156878fc5282a8cbd7de46fe3698d84.jpgb9e4434630145b10529773b03bc63b7b.jpga44c83e6601711bbfc423d48b902ccda.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

There is a website that will give you info on the movement when you type in the serial number. I can't think of it right now, but when I get home I'll post it.

As a side note, I just can't get past the look of a full bridge pocket watch. I'm not  sure why they were made. The open style is so beautiful. The full bridge is like.....well......the ugly step sister. I like seeing the perlage on the parts. 

Posted

I have looked up the watch and was really wondering specifically about the Bartlett? Origin, etc. I do know it is an 1883 Model

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

One of the early employees of the Boston Watch Company, a precursor to the Waltham Company, was a man named Patten Sargeant Bartlett.  From Henry G. Abbot’s “History of the Watch Factories of America" we learn that Bartlett’s family was one of the oldest and most famous puritan families in Massachusetts and that his great uncle, Josiah Bartlett was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence.  P.S. Bartlett left Waltham to assist in the organization of the National Watch Company at Elgin Illinois.  He eventually wound up working for Waltham again as a salesman and then ran his own wholesale business.

 

Abbott tells us that some of the early Waltham movements were engraved “P.S. Bartlett”.  Waltham will continue to use the name “P.S. Bartlett” on movement for many, many years, even through the time Bartlett worked for Elgin and well past his death in 1902.   The author has no concrete proof but feels that more American watch movements were marked “P.S. Bartlett” than any other single indication of grade. There were over 400 runs of the Model 1883 alone with this marking. The competition in this area might come from Elgin's B.W. Raymond.

  • Like 1
Posted
One of the early employees of the Boston Watch Company, a precursor to the Waltham Company, was a man named Patten Sargeant Bartlett.  From Henry G. Abbot’s “History of the Watch Factories of America" we learn that Bartlett’s family was one of the oldest and most famous puritan families in Massachusetts and that his great uncle, Josiah Bartlett was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence.  P.S. Bartlett left Waltham to assist in the organization of the National Watch Company at Elgin Illinois.  He eventually wound up working for Waltham again as a salesman and then ran his own wholesale business.

 

Abbott tells us that some of the early Waltham movements were engraved “P.S. Bartlett”.  Waltham will continue to use the name “P.S. Bartlett” on movement for many, many years, even through the time Bartlett worked for Elgin and well past his death in 1902.   The author has no concrete proof but feels that more American watch movements were marked “P.S. Bartlett” than any other single indication of grade. There were over 400 runs of the Model 1883 alone with this marking. The competition in this area might come from Elgin's B.W. Raymond.

A big "Thank You". for taking the time to respond. The gentleman who owns this watch says that his great grandfather was a Bartlett and that this watch comes from him! I am going to restore it for him as he will pass it down to his kids and so on. Funny how the PS Bartlett name was on these movements where the man himself did not seem to be an executive in the company?

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Posted

The serial No dates the movement to circa 1902. The Bartle name appears on the higher grade movement, usually 17 jewel. I have an example from 1915 (model1908) which keeps excellent time.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Posted
The Model 1883 is a very nice movement to work on. The only tricky bit is sliding the bridge plate over the English Lever.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

I will pay attention to that.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am puzzled by something a snipped out something from your image and what exactly disassemble tell us? my confusion is the symbol for FHF looks like image I have below year symbol as a star and righted this instant are not finding what that means? I suppose we could use the fingerprint system to verify it really is what it claimed to be. Size itself is really interesting there's almost no watches in that particular size. Then were missing details in the photograph above like diameter of movements to verify it really is the size and are missing the setting components.   went to the bestfit book looking at the symbols didn't see it. Look at the link below I did find it back to the bestfit book and yes it really is there https://reference.grail-watch.com/documents/history-of-ebauches-sa/ then bestfit book says lists the size as 10 1/2. one of the problems with vintage watches is finding parts yes a donor watch would be good.
    • Actually, this could be the issue. Drag from the module could be overcoming the cannon pinion. It was definitely not at the point that the driving wheel was loose on the cannon pinion, it took a little bit of effort to rotate it when applying the grease. Maybe I need to look again at applying oil to the pivots.    Yeah, it's very annoying. I don't want to give up on it, so back on with it over again until I catch a break. 
    • The sping is not pushing directly on the cap, but is pushing against the spindle. So, even if the usual black cap is replaced with the micrometer cap, the spindle is still pushed up.
    • But he tells that the micrometer cap doesn't screw into the spindle. How can the spring push the spindle up if there's nothing to grip? There is a screw visible on top of the micrometer cap so should it be able to screw into the spindle? I'm feeling really dumb now. Does anyone manufacture that cap as an aftermarket item? Might be worth investing. Ok so the spindle is different, now I get it.
    • I suppose? If it worked before and it doesn't work now I guess the question would be why does it not work now? That would come back to if you did not have the chronograph module on will it work or is the chronograph module sucking too much power out of the watch basically 99 usually when they go bad you can hold on the tube part and usually just spin the wheel because it has zero holding at all so usually when they go bad they go bad very bad. You should build hotel when you set the watch as to whether it seems to have any friction or not. I'm just wondering if the chronograph module is the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...