Jump to content

French Figurine Gilt Spelter Clock


Blacklab

Recommended Posts

A friend threw this thing at me recently:

1.jpg2.jpg

Bought at a recent car boot sale for the princely sum of £10, it also has a glass dome (not shown) in good condition.

The bad points:

1. Lots of thick gold paint.

2. The figure is missing something in her hand (a mirror?).

3. The alabaster base is cracked in several places, with a section missing at the back.

4. The alabaster on the front is cracked, too short on the sides & has had a non original brass plate fixed to the front.

5. Hands are rusting.

6. It looks like it's taken a few heavy knocks in the past.

7. The sub base is very poor, worn gilding, moth eaten velvet & cracked.

8. Very, very dirty.

The good points.

1. It runs.

2. err..

3. that's it.

Right, lets see what we can do (a polite request to the conservationists among you- look away now, you may not like what you see!)

Movement out and seen from underneath the previous attempts at repair:

3.jpg

The studs holding the figure & the clock case to the base have been replaced with various odds & ends. The base has had some interesting repairs with epoxy:

5.jpg

Copious amounts of gold paint:

6.jpg

The base with the ill fitting stone & brass inserts:

7.jpg

After stripping with Nitromors, acetone & an old tooth brush, were back to the original gold plate (what's left of it). The holes in the treasure chest will be filled with epoxy:

8.jpg

A new mirror is fashioned out of a piece of scrap alloy & epoxied in place (note the casting detail showing now the paint has gone):

9.jpg

The cracked alabaster base is soaked in acetone for about a week to remove the old epoxy then resembled using clear epoxy:

10.jpg

The missing section is remoulded by laying the item face down on baking parchment, fashioning a couple of dams out of old Rodico & filling with epoxy (Araldite in this case):

11.jpg 

Mould removed, more clear epoxy applied to fill the cracks. Also the front stone is extended using the same method:

12.jpg

Filled & sanded using wet & dry papers. The colour match on the front piece was adjusted for a better match by adding a little more of the clear Araldite. It looks like it originally had a couple of rosettes fitted:

14.jpg

Given a further polishing with diamond impregnated polishing pads it begins to shine, unfortunately alabaster is almost impossible to repair invisibly so we will have to live with the cracks. It is however somewhat more stable:

15.jpg

Onto the movement. Stamped S (Samuel) Marti, Medaille de Bronze - this being awarded during 1860 in Paris. The company later received the Medaille d'Argent in 1889, so it would have been produced between these two dates.  Nothing major to report, just a bit tarnished, oily & grubby:

16.jpg17.jpg18.jpg

Duly cleaned in Horolene, checked & showing (amazingly) no discernible wear:

19.jpg

The case was originally (very thinly) gold plated, showing the copper base coat & spelter in places. As electroplating is too expensive, gilding using gold leaf was attempted first but the colour was far too bright yellow, so the case was repainted using a couple of thin coats (to preserve the detail) of Rustoleum brilliant gold (Valspars equivalent was also tried but looked to brassy). New screw studs for the clock case & figure closely matched to the original ones still in the figure were sourced from www.ba-bolts.co.uk . The alabaster stone base inserts still looked a little dull, so were given a thick coat of clear acrylic high gloss varnish. The non original brass plate covering the front alabaster insert was replaced with 2 brass rosettes from Cousins & painted to match case. The gilt sub base was sprayed gold & the fabric recovered using purple dressmaking velvet with gold rope trim. The wood main base (not shown in the final pics) was cleaned & french polished. Movement regulated. Dial cleaned. Hands re-blued etc:

..........and this is what it looks like now:

21.jpg20.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by Blacklab
Picture not reqd
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you undertake all the work yourself because it's looking good. I'm going to concentrate on the clock movement. Do you have the original pendulum it would be stamped 1515, the numbers  5 2 is the French measurement for the length of the pendulum. It is an 8 day French movement with count wheel strike on the back plate. The proper way to clean these movements is to polish all brass with brasso  using a cloth, all screws should be cleaned up and polished normally in a lathe and polished with very fine emery sticks then blued, all brass should after being cleaned and rinsed and dried should be chalked brushed using French chalk which you buy in a block this prevents tarnish.

After all the bashing about the clock has had the dial is in one piece, I can't even see fine hairline cracks even the key holes haven't been touched.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great result Blacklab. The french movements I have worked on have always been in remarkable condition considering their age. As old hippy states, the dials are very often cracked/damaged but this one is in real good condition. 

Very nice indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind comments all.

Oldhippy - Thanks for the extra info. All work undertaken by me. The pendulum did match (sorry no photo & the clock has been returned). The steel parts were cleaned in lighter fluid but were in good nick so left alone. The rest got a dip in Priory Polishes No1 Clock cleaning fluid (sorry - mistakenly said Horolene in the original article), rinsed in water,then IPA, dried, followed by a good rub with Priory Polishes impregnated brass cloth, then IPA again, dried & finally rubbed over with a clean Selvyt cloth. The dial appeared faultless, amazing really considering the state of the case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...