Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all.

I was wondering if there is a sure fire way of NOT mixing up screws when reassembling a watch? The reason I ask is that I try to take as much care as humanly possible to keep the little sub-assemblies segregated; bridges with their screws, etc. I also photograph every step of the disassembly and have the photos on my computer screen when I'm actually reassembling the movement. Despite all this, the screws usually get mixed up and I end up guessing which one goes where on occasion. I think this mix up occurs during cleaning when stuff tends to mix together. 

Very often the screws have the same thread but one is slightly longer than the other and logic doesn't seem to help in deciding which one goes where. So any suggestions about this - is it experience over time that is the answer, i.e., do you just know what screw goes where once you worked over enough movements or is there some technique you use to prevent this confusion? 

Snow in the forecast for Edmonton this weekend - maybe I should have emigrated to Australia instead!

Posted

when i was a hardware tech, taking apart laptops and printers and phones and other electronics, I just laid out the parts left to right across the desk/table as I disassembled whatever I was working on and then reverse to put it back together.  I didn't have the washing up step so it was easy as everything was right where I left it.  I can remember one Dell Latitude model that had 4 or 5 different screw lengths and the holes weren't marked as to which screw went into each hole and the screws were used to complete the grounding on the boards and if you got it wrong the laptop wouldn't power on.  if you got it really wrong, you'd fry the darn thing.  The following year, they started molding reference letters into the plastic.

With cars, it was the same kind of thing, lay the stuff out in order and keep things that go together, together.

in the beginning with watches, i used post-its and put the parts on a post-it. and i was washing parts by hand so i would keep them separate that way.  with the washer, they would go into separate little thimble screw-together holders.

in the beginning, you just need to document everything but it gets easier with practice.

Posted

As I disassemble the movement I simply screw the screw back into the hole it came out of once the bit it was securing has been removed before moving on to the next part.

Disadvantages; it adds a little time to the dismantling process.

Advantages; the screws never get mixed up, and there is much less risk of them going missing during the cleaning process.

If you look over any of my walk throughs you will see the screws have been replaced at each step.

  • Like 2
Posted

Practice is what it takes. When you have good experience you will find you will be able to put all the screws together, as an apprentice I would put the screws with the part, when it came to cleaning I would try and put identical screws with the parts in a section of the basket, got mixed up a few times but as I said its experience.    

Posted
11 hours ago, Scouseget said:

Hi all.

I was wondering if there is a sure fire way of NOT mixing up screws when reassembling a watch? The reason I ask is that I try to take as much care as humanly possible to keep the little sub-assemblies segregated; bridges with their screws, etc.

Label the tray, and keep screws segregated there, no need to wash them. Note this is my just opinion. I do not want to get into another debate on the benefits of washing and moving around screws or parts that are clean and do not carry friction.

P1292185.JPG

 

  • Like 1
Posted

FWIW, I have several of those small micro screen holders (lower right side of white tray in jdm's picture), and put applicable screws and the bridge/plate/bracket piece together in separate holders to help keep them straight for cleaning and re-assembly.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi All, I’m having a hard time finding a balance assembly or even a working donor movement for a Gruen 330.  Any leads appreciated.   Gruen doesn’t stamp the caliber number of the movement but lust in the case back.   
    • Why do you think this is Fontainemelon ?  The balance staff you will need to source separately.  But first it's important to accurately identify what you have there. Research Ebauches Sa, see who was in group, to find the brand that made this movement. 
    • Hi Watchrepairtalk, I have some questions about part sourcing I was hoping someone here might be able to help with. I'm working on an FHF 180 movement with a broken balance staff, broken regulator pins, and damaged cap jewels (both top and bottom). Some Googling says that this is similar to other FHF calibers like 150s, 160s, 180s and so on but I can't figure out what the functional difference is between these movements.  Is there any reason I wouldn't be able to acquire a donor FHF 150 or similar (with no shock protection) and use parts from that or would it be smarter to source replacements individually? Also are there any sources someone could recommend to get bulk cap jewels like this? Thank you for the help!
    • Hello and welcome to the WRT forum.
    • interesting video nice to see the machine what it can do now I wonder what it costs and I'm sure it's not in my budget. Plus the video brought up questions but the website below answers the questions? What was bothering me was the size of his machine 4 mm because I thought it was bigger than that? But then it occurred to me that maybe they had variations it looks like four, seven and 10. With the seven and 10 being the best because way more tool positions in way more rotating tools. Although I bet you all the rotating tools are probably separate cost https://www.tornos.com/en/content/swissnano   Then as we been talking about Sherline. Just so that everyone's aware of this they have another division their industrial division where you can buy bits and pieces. I have a link below that shows that just in case you don't want to have the entire machine you just need bits and pieces. https://www.sherline.com/product-category/industrial-products-division/   Let's see what we can do with the concept I explained up above and bits and pieces. For one thing you can make a really tiny gear very tiny like perhaps you're going to make a watch. Then another version the center part is not separate it is all machined from one piece. Then fills gear cutting machines have gone through multiple of evolutions. A lot of it based on what he wanted to make like he was going to make a watch unfortunately eyesight issues have prevented that. Another reason why you should start projects like this much sooner when your eyesight is really good or perhaps start on watches first and then move the clocks then local we have from the industrial division? Looks like two separate motors and heads. Then it's hard to see but this entire thing is built on top of a much larger milling machine as a larger milling machine gave a very solid platform to build everything.   Then like everything else that had multiple generations are versions the indexing went through of course variations like above is one version and the one below was the last version. Now the version below I mentioned that previously and somewhere in the beginning to discussion and somebody else had one in their picture. As it is a really nice precision indexing. Then I wasn't sure if I had a the watch photos here is his unfinished watch. No he wasn't going to make a simple watch like none of his clocks were simply either what would be the challenge and that.    
×
×
  • Create New...