Jump to content

Timex 21 Jewel!


jeffc83

Recommended Posts

I started a new topic because this isn't any ordinary Timex...this one actually has jewels and 21 of them, lol.  Also to my surprise, I noticed a little cote de geneve in there, wow, just wow...Apparently, Timex felt the need to add this but NOT use screws so I can service it the right way?  No words there, haha.  The following pictures show a 1969 21 Jewel Manual Wind before and after the watchpocolipse;)  Man, did this one need a lot of work.  The stem was literally rusted out towards the crown and it was wound tight.  This one took a longer bath than the others and the "swish" was more aggressive;)  In the end, I ended up with another beautiful watch and it too keeps very good time! (+/- 9 sec day so far)  In between projects, I serviced a Helbros as well....will post it up soon. 

post-1795-0-04066800-1458049687_thumb.pn

post-1795-0-99819000-1458049711_thumb.jp

post-1795-0-00080000-1458049715_thumb.pn

post-1795-0-92079000-1458049724_thumb.jp

post-1795-0-78994800-1458049729_thumb.jp

Edited by jeffc83
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done Jeff, but this is a watch repair forum and we like to see pictures of the engine, not just the bodywork! ;)

 

That would normally help but this is a Timex man, LOL ;)   I'll get some shots of the ol' dunk and swish method and will post them here.  I'll also take a few shots of this one since the decoration on the movement is quite nice!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would've been amazing if they used screws versus rivets on this one;)  To me, it looks nicer but is still an ordinary Timex movement.  As a comparison, I attached a pic of a standard movement that I serviced last night.

 

As a side note, the Timex bug is starting to go away so I'll be going back to nice Swiss movements again soon, 17 Jewel and up;)

post-1795-0-34659100-1458133722_thumb.jp

Edited by jeffc83
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found that entire tear-down really fascinating.  That movement really looks odd.  And what about the nylon shock ring around the movement?  Timex were pretty out-there designing such a thing.  Overall the restored watch looks great!  I love that 60s style.  Is it a pin lever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oldhippy; they're not that bad, lol.  They actually sold for a ridiculous cost of $65-70 back in the 60's, which was it's ultimate demise. (no one would pay that much so it failed)

 

Stroppy; yes, it has a pin-lever but the Jeweled models are a "jewel lever", which is quite interesting to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ross yes we all love the forum and yes a lot of these facebook groups are awful and will never compare to what we have here. But facebook is exactly what you make it for yourself, some let the world know what they had for tea and if they threw it up again lol. It took me years to enter into the realm of facebook and 95 % of it i ignore completely,  i use it to my advantage, I'm not an addict of it like most of the world is. My profile contains absolutely nothing about me, its not even my real name, all it is for me is a vehical for me to access information, if i dont like what i see i ignore it. You develop an attitude of indignation towards the vast majority of it.
    • No, It's still showing the "20 Micron" between the lugs.
    • Thanks for the replies.  @Neverenoughwatches  If you have something that looks suitable, let me know and I'll get some dimensions.  Thanks.
    • Thinking.  Mark has said he would be here for the foreseeable.  I have looked at other watch forums. One will not let me join as my 'browser' is not set? Another feels very complicated. Another has showing of collections of Rolex etc, all vying to show what they have. Not what they do for watch servicing. And, the criticism of others is so prevalent.  I asked a question and received, "Read a book more often" as a reply. I was given advice and constructive criticism by members, who advised the book, but realised as a result of my dyslexia, my difficulties. And so spent time assisting me.  I like and enjoy this forum. I am at 2 1/2 years into my self imposed 5 year apprenticeship. Averaging 10 hrs per week. I can do virtually anything that needs to be done. I still lack some tools. DIY skills makes a lot of things available to me. Someone made the comment about 'Facebook'? Open my life for the inspection of others? No thank you.
    • Come on chaps i need some ideas, i have the right staff for the movement, i can probably make up another hairspring and balance wheel with some effort involved, which might not run time accurate but i can deal with that. What I'm really stuck with is an oversized roller hole to fit onto the staff. I cant make a roller, so i have to make this one fit, which is looking like a fastening in repair with adhesive.  Getting the staff in centrally is going to be difficult, I'm guessing the space around the staff is about 50 microns. My other option is to track down a different staff with a better roller fitting profile but match profile sizes elsewhere,  or another correct roller, I'm sure this one has been broached out. It may not even be the correct roller, the staff sits really low inside it. I could just rodico the roller on and then test to see how it interacts with the fork.
×
×
  • Create New...