Jump to content

Zeitner


Santiago

Recommended Posts

Thank you, you are amazing! Would you also be able to help with a further enquiry? This is also to do with a Zeitner watch, but this one is the Aquasport z2000g.i need to replace the movement, which says Rondo, but there doesn't appear to be any numbers.

If you could help that would brilliant

Kind regards, Keith

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, you are amazing! Would you also be able to help with a further enquiry? This is also to do with a Zeitner watch, but this one is the Aquasport z2000g.i need to replace the movement, which says Rondo, but there doesn't appear to be any numbers.

If you could help that would brilliant

Kind regards, Keith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you send a picture of the movement and the watch dial it will help a lot. If the watch has only the regular hands (hours, minutes and second) in addition to the date, I will venture it is a Ronda 515. Then you will have to measure it anyway because it comes in different heights and make sure the date is in the right place (some come with the date at 6) also they come in a 24 hrs version...all that has to be considered.

 

The number of the movement is usually on the edge of the black plastic that makes the "main" plate.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I have attached two photos of the watch, which does have a calendar. Still can't find the model number of the movement even after checking on and beneath the plastic ring; all I can find is the word RONDO.

 

Thanks again for any help - very much appreciated

 

Keith 

post-1826-0-62790600-1455719924_thumb.jp

post-1826-0-39890500-1455719926_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Thank you!   Yes I did. I did not notice a difference. Although 9415 is advertised as a thixotropic grease (and I did had high hopes for it), the only advantage at this point I see is that its “easier” to apply than an oil (if one does not use epilame). But this is subjective, I guess. What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement. Oil in this case is a bit more forgiving, as its super thin, and it would usually just spread out.  Again, imho.
    • Mark keeps a close eye on his forum. I'm sure if you asked him he will reply, he might not do it right away but you will receive his answer.  
    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that. When cohesive forces within a liquid are stronger than the adhesive forces of a surface then surface tension is high causing the liquid to bead up. So  an applied epilame coating reduces the adhesive force of a surface inhibiting a fluid to wet the surface. So i guess no epilame cannot both repel and attract . If something is keeping the oil in place on top of an epilamed surface then there must be another reason for that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
×
×
  • Create New...