Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Gents, have a look at this picture and tell me if the impulse jewel is correct (position) I was on the train of thought that it should be at right angles to the spikes of the balance wheel.

This is how this one came to me and it's firmly attached, after a day of using parts from 3 movements to make one runner I have this hurdle to cross now. The movement runs to a fashion but happily stops whenever it wants to, also the balance/escape makes a clanging sound every 3rd or so swing so something isn't quite right on the escapement side of things. Cheers for any help

F1C8DDD1-1F7E-4D3D-8330-C940B774A691_zps

Posted

You can't change the position of the impulse jewel on the table, it's inexroably aligned to the safety crescent.

 

What you can do is change the position of these items in relation to the escapement anchor by adjusting the stud anchor position or the rate adjustment stud.

 

Both of these activities are clearly explained in a couple of videos on Youtube, search for rebanking and overbanking.

 

One of our members recently posted these great tips but I can't remember who (Lagavulin has dulled the memory cells but delighted all other senses).

Posted

I'm happy that the actual impulse jewel cannot be moved but the table it sits on can, so is the table wrongly fitted? I as this only because all others I've had are more central ie 90degrees to the arms.

But in the location it is, the impulse jewel sits as near as dammit midway between the banking pins when the balance is at rest, which is telling me (with my limited knowledge) that the roller table is correctly fitted.

Posted

But in the location it is, the impulse jewel sits as near as dammit midway between the banking pins when the balance is at rest, which is telling me (with my limited knowledge) that the roller table is correctly fitted.

If it is sitting as you say, it is correct.

If the balance wheel is perfectly poised, it really doesn't matter what position the spokes sit when the balance is at rest as long as the hairspring and balance jewel are set correctly relative to one another and the escapement wheel.

It always looks that bit neater when the jewel is at 90 degrees to the spokes of the balance, but you would have to fiddle about withe the position of the hairspring collet relative to balance wheel to get it to sit where you want it when the balance assembly is fitted to the movement. Once you achieved that you would then have to fit the roller table and fine adjust it relative to the line between the balance and escape wheel pivots to ensure correct beat. All in all not worth the effort!

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...