Jump to content

Accuracy.


Recommended Posts

Hi guys, am new to WRT and like what I see so far!

I was wondering how obsessed (or not) you guys get about the accuracy of your watches?

I have a very modest collection which consist mainly of ETA 2824-2 and Selita SW200-2 movements. They are all of a similar age. What degree of accuracy should I expect from these movements (s/d) and what sort of `settling` in period is normal (if any) before best accuracy should be expected?

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ETA 2824's are very capable of good time consistancy, especially if recently serviced.  They do have a tendency to drop off a bit when needing a service.

For instance, I have a new Elabore grade 2824-2 running +5 seconds a day, with similar numbers on a timegrapher, too.  With little positional variance.  That is very good.

This new watch worked into these #'s within a few weeks of use.  The watch is a Steinhart Ocean Vintage 1.

 

Accurancy is really a measure of how consistant it is.  If your new 2824 is running around ~ +/- 6-8 s/d day WITH CONSISTANCY that is very good for a basic or Elabore grade. 

 

If your watch has the upgraded chronometer grade than +/- 5-6 seconds a day is expected.

 

Keep in mind that a properly set up, regulated and serviced Elabore can give a Chronometer grade a run for its money.

Edited by perpetual92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ETA 2824's are very capable of good time consistancy, especially if recently serviced.  They do have a tendency to drop off a bit when needing a service.

For instance, I have a new Elabore grade 2824-2 running +5 seconds a day, with similar numbers on a timegrapher, too.  With little positional variance.  That is very good.

This new watch worked into these #'s within a few weeks of use.  The watch is a Steinhart Ocean Vintage 1.

 

Accurancy is really a measure of how consistant it is.  If your new 2824 is running around ~ +/- 6-8 s/d day WITH CONSISTANCY that is very good for a basic or Elabore grade. 

 

If your watch has the upgraded chronometer grade than +/- 5-6 seconds a day is expected.

 

Keep in mind that a properly set up, regulated and serviced Elabore can give a Chronometer grade a run for its money.

Good response perpetual "accuracy is how constant a watch is". Rolex used to be +/- 3 secs a day, if excellent timekeeping is your real thing then quartz is the movement you require.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you perpetual92, the numbers pretty much agree with what my watches are running. The only exception is my Squale 1521 which is probably closer to +12 s/d, it is the newest of my collection, have to say it is very consistent so may get it regulated at some point.

Im right in saying getting it regulated is no big deal by a competent watchmaker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you perpetual92, the numbers pretty much agree with what my watches are running. The only exception is my Squale 1521 which is probably closer to +12 s/d, it is the newest of my collection, have to say it is very consistent so may get it regulated at some point.

Im right in saying getting it regulated is no big deal by a competent watchmaker?

If it only needs regulating then yes no big deal but does take a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum Olympus, that is good advice given by the guys.

Whatever you do, don't drive yourself insane looking for perfection with a mechanical wristwatch, there is no such thing. If I had a mechanical watch that was running at +12 sec and it was chronometer grade I would think about service, and or adjustment. If it wasn't a chronometer, I'd probably leave as is. Also remember that your watch will have to be ideally timed to you and your everyday movements to get the best result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oly593, I assume from your username you are an aviation enthusiast. So to put this subject into perspective, the Olympus 593 engine was controlled by a mechanical computer. This technology has essentially disappeared on modern engines and has been supplanted by digital electronics and software. The reasons for this range through cost, quality, performance, reliability, maintainability and of course accuracy. So why did we love to see the Vulcan fly, and what drove so many people to work on doing that? Passion, emotions, pride, inspiration? Pick your own reasons. With advances in manufacturing and measuring capability, the last few of those old mechanical computers which are still being made have been improved significantly, but mechanisms will always suffer from friction, wear, thermal expansion, etc., so there is a limit.

And so it is with mechanical watches. The quartz watch is a much more accurate timepiece, so why do we love our mechanical watches? Passion, emotions, pride, inspiration? Or is it just like the Vulcan - they make a great noise?

Unless you aspire to be a master watchmaker, as long as you don't have to keep resetting your watch, stop worrying about accuracy and enjoy it for what it means to you. Then as Bob says, buy an old watch, get your screwdrivers out, take apart, rebuild it, and you'll discover that you have a greater tolerance for inaccuracy!

S

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, I have watches with Russian movements (6), Chinese movements (1), Japanese movements (2), and Quartz (2).

 

I regulate all my mechanicals to be within +/-2 to 3 seconds per day, adjusted to my wearing patterns. For instance, my one Chinese movement watch has an instantaneous rate that can vary anywhere between about -2s/d and +8s/d depending on how wound it is, and its orientation, but it averages out to very close to zero with my wearing patterns. I wear it about 16h/d on weekdays and 8h/d on weekends, and it has averaged +0.05s/d since November 1st.

 

So I guess you could say I'm a stickler for accuracy. Anything more than about +5s/d or -1s/d and I'll do something about it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the things I find amusing with watch accuracy is the difference between what the watch company expects and the owner of the watch expects..

 

So at one time ETA on the same website that lists their technical guides also had the manufacturing information guides. I'm attaching the one for the 2824-2. The guide has all sorts of  interesting information regarding timekeeping  technical specifications etc. which are not found in the normal repair guides.

 

Then there's a little more than just putting a watch on the timing machine one time you also need to check it 24 hours later. The PDF found at the link below has all sorts of nifty calculations other stuff you need if you really want to Know if your Watch is keeping perfect time.

 

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Calculation%20of%20the%20values%20X-D-DVH-Di-Im-N.pdf

ETA-2824-2-Manufacturing-Info-Fr-Gr-En.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Bob, Welcome to the forum and thank you for your service.  I would never try to discourage you from getting into this wonderful hobby/profession, but please be aware, it does not cost just a few dollars to get into watch repair.  Tools are expensive and in many instances the cheap knockoffs are worthless, especially when learning.  You can get the tools needed to disassemble, clean, inspect, reassemble and lubricate a watch without spending thousands, but as soon as you start getting into task-specific tools, there are so many and they don’t come cheap.  My suggestion is to start with the basics required to disassemble, clean, inspect, reassemble and lubricate only, and build upon that gradually as the need for other tools arises.  The advice above regarding starting out on working movements is gold. Many of the non-running watches on eBay have been bought, tinkered with, deemed too difficult and then sold again, often with more damage done each time.  Without experience, you clean and service a non-runner and it still doesn’t run. What now? Troubleshooting is difficult as a beginner. This can become very frustrating.  I would encourage you to buy a working movement, and learn to strip and service it. If it isn’t running afterwards, you know it’s down to you, and as long as you didn’t damage anything you know that the parts you’ve got can form a ticking watch. An excellent movement to start with is the ETA 6497 clones from China, such as the ST36. They’re not expensive, and although it finds use in some larger wristwatches, this movement was originally designed for use in pocket watches, so everything is larger and easier to see and handle.  Once you can service a new ST36 and have it running better than it did when it arrived, you’re definitely ready to step up to working vintage watches and then think about repair of non running or poorly running watches.  As far as cleaning solutions go, you will not do better than the commercial watch cleaning and rinsing solutions that are available. You’ll find plenty of suggestions for home brew cleaners online, but the professional products are superior and you want to give yourself every advantage you can, especially when you start working on vintage movements containing hardened decomposed lubricants and often years worth of other dirt and dust. Alcohol is ok for cleaning or rinsing movement parts that don’t contain any shellac. The pallet fork and roller table contain jewels secured with shellac and will tolerate a rinse in alcohol but not prolonged exposure. Methanol dissolves shellac faster than ethanol, and isopropyl alcohol dissolves shellac slower than ethanol. Just in case you don’t know already, the radium on the dial (and likely the hands) of your Dad’s Elgin is highly radioactive. It is safe enough when safely contained within the watch case, but the moment you open the watch and especially when handling the dial or hands you must take precautions against inhaling or ingesting any radium.  Best Regards, Mark
    • I have both sets and use the K&D 99% of the time.  Yes, you have to be careful with the pin.  I use a screwdriver to carefully release the pin from the spring.  Some skill is involved.   I have also modified/replaced the pins in the arbors as necessary.  Yeah, you would think a tool would not require modification, but such is the world of watchmaking.  There is no perfect tool.  Each watchmaker must the tools to his skill, or vice versa.
    • I have the 8-11mm K&D but it doesn't do a great job with modern mainsprings, or I have had terrible luck. The arbor pin protrudes too much and I have damaged more springs trying to disengage the arbor than I have successfully wound and inserted. It seems easier to use with old carbon steel springs. My Watchctaft set gets far more use, though I have to get creative to wind left hand springs
    • It depends on what the gaskets are made from but silicone lubricant should work.  Spray or rub on a generous amount, put in a sealed bag and wait a couple of days.  Test for softness and wipe off the excess.  
    • For hardened gaskets, an experienced watchmaker told me he usually found heat to be the best to soften them up. I tried that on a '70's Tissot where the gasket had turned to essentially epoxy to no avail, but eventually got it off with a 5700 case back opener using a crowbar for leverage to turn the wheel.
×
×
  • Create New...