Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello. Some time ago I watched a video I can no longer find, in which the watchmaker had a tool to check the accuracy of a quartz watch and tweak it by adjusting the trimmer and then check the results. What is the measuring device called?

Thanks
Paul

Posted

In my experience repairing /testing quartz watches the likes of the Horotec are good as is the quartz watches analyser which I use by Le Arsi. 1168-1NC86.  The Le Arsi one being a bit cheaper with all the functions.  I did have one of these Indian made pulse testers which broke and when I took it to bits to repair it was cobbled crap so binned it. basically you get what you pay for.  If you want information on the analyser give me a PM.

.

IMG_0325.jpeg

IMG_0326.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

In my experience repairing /testing quartz watches the likes of the Horotec are good as is the quartz watches analyser which I use by Le Arsi. 1168-1NC86.  The Le Arsi one being a bit cheaper with all the functions.  I did have one of these Indian made pulse testers which broke and when I took it to bits to repair it was cobbled crap so binned it. basically you get what you pay for.  If you want information on the analyser give me a PM.

.

IMG_0325.jpeg

IMG_0326.jpeg

The problem with this type of tester is that it doesn't tell you how accurate the watch is.

  • Like 1
Posted

f

16 hours ago, paulskiogorki said:

What is the measuring device called?

basically the same name as you would call a device for timing mechanical which would be a timing machine. Witschi makes them not cheap. Often times was some of the machines is an add-on accessory. Can find vintage ones on eBay at a variety of prices although I'm rather curious as to why you would like to adjust your watch?

then the link below as a quartz testing machine which will do accuracy. You can download the users guide when you're there.

https://www.esslinger.com/horotec-flash-tester-quartz-watch-tester/

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Kimmoth said:

Surely such devices are unnecessary if you're just prepared to wait a bit? Set the time, check it a day later, tweak, repeat until happy, no?

Why wait when you can get something with other functions for <£30 and do it in minutes.

Posted
6 hours ago, Kimmoth said:

Surely such devices are unnecessary if you're just prepared to wait a bit? Set the time, check it a day later, tweak, repeat until happy, no?

that method can get pretty tedious, especially when running a business doing this sort of thing.  It can take weeks sometimes to dial in a watch accurately, or I can pop it on the timing machine and adjust it in a few seconds.  A timing machine also provides a good indication of the current running health of a watch, which is almost impossible to measure otherwise.

Posted
2 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Why wait when you can get something with other functions for <£30 and do it in minutes.

Andy, do really believe this item can test the rate error of a quartz watch? Sorry, but I don‘t. Where are the technical data of this toy?

Frank

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, praezis said:

Andy, do really believe this item can test the rate error of a quartz watch? Sorry, but I don‘t. Where are the technical data of this toy?

Frank

Yes they do and from my tests they're accurate enough to be
showing 0.5 to 1.0 s/d resulting in 15 to 30 seconds over 28 days.

Also tested one that was showing 5 s/d which resulted
in a little over 2 minutes loss over the 28 days.

Posted
16 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Yes they do and from my tests they're accurate enough to be
showing 0.5 to 1.0 s/d

Thank you! Ok, that is what I suspected, an ordinary quartz inside. This accuracy or better you can also get from a Weishi or any  soundcard based TM.

For real quartz accuracy tests you would need a reference about 10x better than a quartz. 

But of course you can make comparison tests and adjustments with that device or with any of the mentioned ones, if you already know the error of of the quartz watch (as you will do with mechanical ones): just change rate by the difference.

Only precondition: quartz frequency of your tester must stay invariable during test time(s). This however is uncertain after switching on and the following 15-30 minutes.

Frank

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, praezis said:

For real quartz accuracy tests you would need a reference about 10x better than a quartz. 

So what quartz movements are you working on that require an accuracy
greater then the +/- 20 seconds per month stated by most manufacturers.

Posted
46 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

So what quartz movements are you working on that require an accuracy
greater then the +/- 20 seconds per month stated by most manufacturers.

Besides the fact that trimmers disappeared many decades ago: I would expect +/- 3 s/month after an adjustment, what is something like a standard (0.1 s/day).
That requires a tester accurate to +/- 0.01 s/day.

Frank

Posted
3 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Yes they do and from my tests they're accurate enough to be
showing 0.5 to 1.0 s/d resulting in 15 to 30 seconds over 28 days.

Also tested one that was showing 5 s/d which resulted
in a little over 2 minutes loss over the 28 days.

Andy, Id like to get your thoughts on the Flashtest. Do you recommend it? Im needing a quartz timing machine for my SGUS account, and im not sure which one to buy

Posted
7 minutes ago, SwissSeiko said:

Andy, Id like to get your thoughts on the Flashtest. Do you recommend it? Im needing a quartz timing machine for my SGUS account, and im not sure which one to buy

The Flastest does look a nice piece of kit but I don't think I just justify the price for myself.

Posted
51 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

The Flastest does look a nice piece of kit but I don't think I just justify the price for myself.

It's actually pretty reasonable compared to the other ones I see online that can get into the $1100-$1500 range. This would be for professional use. I really only need the timing aspect of if, as I have the other horotech turbo and a good coil/battery tester. But having them all in one would be a plus.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

I would like to see pictures of theses marvelous quartz testers as all the low price ones I have had were crap. So much so I built my own  before acquiring the Horotec.

What pictures do you want to see as I've just got a second one for work and haven't had any problems with either of them.

Edit

EFM8 Microcontroller driven

 

IMG_20241205_193305.jpg

IMG_20241205_193412.jpg

IMG_20241205_193432.jpg

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Yes they do and from my tests they're accurate enough to be
showing 0.5 to 1.0 s/d resulting in 15 to 30 seconds over 28 days.

Also tested one that was showing 5 s/d which resulted
in a little over 2 minutes loss over the 28 days.

Interesting because?

I'm attaching specifications of Omega quartz watches because we have nice specifications for quite a few watches and we can work out a approximation of what a quartz watch can and cannot do. So excluding the best timekeeping and one of the extreme worst the majority of quartz watches keep time within -9 / +15 Seconds per month.

Then your timing machine has a problem as well let me give you something that witschi has the commenting on the effect of temperature and did notice when they give a suggestion of rate it's in seconds per day but it is a fraction of a second.

image.thumb.png.79bdb25876209d23f0f6658dc0063175.png

 

17 hours ago, Kimmoth said:

Surely such devices are unnecessary if you're just prepared to wait a bit? Set the time, check it a day later, tweak, repeat until happy, no?

You run into several problems first most quartz watches no longer have trimmer capacitors to adjust you cannot adjust the rate at all. Then whatever you're comparing You are quartz watch to has to keep time better than the quartz watch by quite a bit. Then were talking about seconds per month fractions of a second per day and measuring fractions of a second per day is not impossible but in the case of the quartz watch would be impossible. Typically a quartz watch would step once per second which means you cannot break its accuracy down to less than one second. Mechanical watches typically at 18,000 beats per hour there secondhand step five times per second and you can get a fractional seconds. So can you regulate your quartz watch yes if it as a trimmer and if you want to take months to do it.

 

 

8641_WI_18_QUARTZ MOVEMENTS - TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS E cousinsuk.pdf

  • Like 3
Posted

To clarify I'm using my quartz tester on non adjustable quartz movements as a quick test to confirm
the movement is within the range quoted by most manufacturers i.e. +/- 20 Seconds per month.

I think the figures quoted by @praezis of +/- 3 s/month after an adjustment although may be
ideal are totally impractical unless the movement has temperature and voltage compensation.

Posted

I have one of those testers from AliExpress. It measures the period over 12 seconds then flashes the results for a few seconds.

The only problem is it can't measure those 2 hands movements that pulse once in 20 seconds. It only works for movements that tick every second.

Posted

Hi Andy   Is that one a DIY or purpose built. It looks professional built. The cheap  ones made in India by Rohan industries were cobbled together poor soldering and wiring.  Always interested in tools.   Who made the one shown .

Hi. Attached is the training manual supplied by Witschi regarding both mechanical and quartz watches.

witschi_training_course.pdf

  • Like 1
Posted

I struggle to see the value in using a piece of test equipment built around a quartz crystal oscillator to measure the rate of a watch built around a quartz crystal oscillator. Unless the test equipment is calibrated and certified by an accredited measurement lab you'd have no way of knowing how much of any difference measured was from error in the watch or in the test equipment itself.

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...