Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Greetings everyone!

 

Recently bought an old Omega Genève, with a 565 movement. The watch had some water damage and by the looks of it, someone tried to repair it but failed.

The hair spring while oscillating was touching the regulators boot. Which led to low amplitude approx. 120-140 degrees. 
 

I took the balance assembly apart, and noticed the spring looked a bit out of shape. The result of me trying to straighten the hair spring you can see on the picture I added.

 

After re-assembly, the timegrapher shows improvement in amplitude and beat error. Now its about 225-235 and 0.2 error. Which I would assume is still a bit low. 
 

I do not see any wear on the pallet work or on any of the wheel of the drive train. The main spring is replaced. 
 

Does the hair spring look ok to you? What else could I check? 
 

Thank you in advance!

 

 

IMG_5645.jpeg

IMG_5647.jpeg

Edited by swiss2k
Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, swiss2k said:

Does the hair spring look ok to you? What else could I check? 
 

Hairspring looks OK. What else to check - all the usual stuff !

Endshake in barrel arbor, not too much play in arbor bridge hole. Check gear train runs freely,  end shake on all gears and balance, jewels dirty/damaged/loose(pallet/roller), too much tension on centre seconds spring etc etc 

How long does the balance swing (no pallet) when given a blast with a puffer?

Edited by mikepilk
  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Hairspring looks OK. What else to check - all the usual stuff !

Endshake in barrel arbor, not too much play in arbor bridge hole. Check gear train runs freely,  end shake on all gears and balance, jewels dirty/damaged/loose(pallet/roller), too much tension on centre seconds spring etc etc 

How long does the balance swing (no pallet) when given a blast with a puffer?

I should have probably mentioned that I did clean all the parts before assembly.

Basically you think there might not be enough power delivered to the pallet fork? 
 

Will double check everything, thank you!

Posted
2 hours ago, swiss2k said:

After re-assembly, the timegrapher shows improvement in amplitude and beat error. Now its about 225-235 and 0.2 error. Which I would assume is still a bit low. 

Are the timegrapher results you show immediately after re-assembly/lubrication? If so, these numbers often improve after 24-48 hours (20-50 degrees) as the oils and parts bed into their respective positions. Hold you nerve and re-test after 48 hours on a full or near-full wind an you may be pleasantly surprised.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, swiss2k said:

After re-assembly, the timegrapher shows improvement in amplitude and beat error. Now its about 225-235 and 0.2 error. Which I would assume is still a bit low. 

Typically for this group anything less than 300° is unacceptable.

What's interesting is the Swiss Do not pay attention to this group at all. Swiss are more concerned about timekeeping than they are amplitude. Then thinking about timekeeping I don't suppose you can show us the watch in perhaps three positions on the timing machine? Like dial-up and dial down And crown down would be nice it often helps for diagnostics

Oh and thinking about amplitude I see your timing machine is 52° and according to the specs you're supposed to have 49° so that will cause a minor change of the amplitude.

Than very very disturbing for this group so I would suggest the old-timers run away and don't even look but amplitude at 24 hours for this watch is 160°. As I said the Swiss are only concerned about timekeeping. So at the end of 24 hours you have 160°.

image.png.bc78ff0937d31c812b153847c5db91ae.png

Then the definition of amplitude at 24 hours is

image.png.aee179b63232d7a8ea84a56fa8c11b8c.png

Then they three position as an Omega uses for timing for three position watches like yours is found in the image below although I would still make sure you do dial-up and dial down because those should be identical and other good diagnostics do that

image.png.63af8d5f9bcde10ac43e4c36a09141ab.png

 

2 hours ago, Waggy said:

/lubrication?

Then thinking of lubrication what sort of lubrication's did you use and how did you lubricate the escapement?

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, swiss2k said:

The main spring is replaced. 

You've replaced the mainspring with a new one?

48 hours after oiling the train and pallets can increase the amplitude dramatically. I serviced a vintage Omega 552 and saw an increase of about 30 to 40 degrees after two days.

  • Like 1
Posted

It could be that the amplitude is higher than your Timing Machine shows. In my experience, TMs unfortunately don't always show the truth. Try to increase or decrease the gain on your TM (if it has one) and see what it does for the readings. Or, you can try to mount the movement holder on the microphone to decrease the noise from the movement which in my experience is necessary for Omega calibre 268 (the only Omega calibre I've serviced).

You might find this post and other posts in the same thread interesting!

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

Thank you everyone for your replies. 

Main spring. Is new. Not an original Omega, but I did get it from Cousins, and they advertised it as "the one". Also checked the measurement, and those were same to Omega`s. 

Lubrification. D-5 on those with the most load, 9010 gear train, 9415 on the pallet fork jewels. 

Amplitude. After +- 2 days, the amplitude did not change, stays around 220 deg.

Lift angle. My bad, for got to set it back to 48. It always resets...

Gear train. I do not see any excessive play... well at least all have the same play, per my judgement.

Balance. Super free. No axial play. An it seams it feels much better with the spring not rubbing on its self (after straightening).

Mains spring barrel. The arbor is free, but is the play a bit excessive? (on video)

 

Thank you!!

Edited by swiss2k
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, swiss2k said:

9415 on the pallet fork jewels. 

Funny enough, I'm working on an Omega pocket watch which has an amplitude of over 300 and I'm planning to use 9415 to bring it down.

So far, my experience with this "wonder-grease" 9415 has been rather poor, especially on older movements. When changed the oil on the pallet jewels / escape-wheel to Dr.Tillwich 1-3, which would be about the equivalent of Moebius 9010, the amplitude gain is remarkable.

Try that .....

And as JohnR725 asked, what is the amplitude after 24hrs?

My 50-years old Omega 861 runs 250-255 at best when fully wound, around 215-220 after 24hrs. It gains every day 1 second, day after day, week in, week out. Perhaps not an amplitude "high-flyer", but It's the best time-keeper I ever had!

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Endeavor said:

nd as JohnR725 asked, what is the amplitude after 24hrs?

My 50-years old Omega 861 runs 250-255 at best when fully wound, around 215-220 after 24hrs. It gains every day 1 second, day after day, week in, week out. Perhaps not an amplitude "high-flyer", but It's the best time-keeper I ever had!

So for the group your watch is a failure. As the amplitude is unacceptably too low. But as far as Omega is concerned they would be very happy.

image.png.6aff35bd37db98cf74a42a9961424866.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, swiss2k said:

 

Thank you everyone for your replies. 

Main spring. Is new. Not an original Omega, but I did get it from Cousins, and they advertised it as "the one". Also checked the measurement, and those were same to Omega`s. 

Lubrification. D-5 on those with the most load, 9010 gear train, 9415 on the pallet fork jewels. 

Amplitude. After +- 2 days, the amplitude did not change, stays around 220 deg.

Lift angle. My bad, for got to set it back to 48. It always resets...

Gear train. I do not see any excessive play... well at least all have the same play, per my judgement.

Balance. Super free. No axial play. An it seams it feels much better with the spring not rubbing on its self (after straightening).

Mains spring barrel. The arbor is free, but is the play a bit excessive? (on video)

 

Thank you!!

That endshake of the barrel arbor is huge! That needs closing up. I'm assuming the barrel cover has been bent in a convex way to create that excessive shake. Put the barrel cover on a staking block and check how flat it is then bend it to suit a better endshake

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Quick update. Both the barrel and the cover were bent. I did manage to strengthen them. The arbor seems to spin freely. 
The amplitude is still the same, at 49 its around 217-222. I was expecting some improvement. Will check again in 24 and 48h. 
 

 

IMG_5669.jpeg

Edited by swiss2k
  • Like 1
Posted

When you move the index which changes the timing from an extreme fast to an extreme slow, is there a big change in beat error? Obviously there will be a big change in timing.

If there is a big difference in BE then this is strongly inferring the the end-curve of the hairspring isn't set correctly or/and the collet is central to the jewel on the balance cock, because the hairspring that is breathing between the curb pin and boot is being pushed and/or pulled when you move the index from left to right. Also not having the hairspring set correctly can dramatically reduce the amplitude.

A quick check is to take power off the movement and move the index from extreme fast to slow and with high magnification see if the hairspring sits nicely between the curb pin and boot at all times (give the balance a spin and watch the hairspring - has it got total freedom?) or if it moves by being pushed or pulled by the curb pin or boot. I'm guessing it is the latter.

I think that may be a possibility to your problem.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Hi @Jon,
so, from one extreme to another the beat error is 0.1(min.pos) to 0.2(msx.pos), and as you mentioned the rate does up and down dramatically. Also checked the position of the collet, and the collet is not central to the jewel on the balance cock. Balance moves freely, per my understanding.

 

So, after 24h the ampl. fell down by approx 20 deg, which I would assume is expected. After adjusting the endshake I believe I gained around +10 deg. of balance movement. Which is great, and overall the balance is not at 220'ish deg.

 

What I did next, some might think is non-orthodox, but was wort a try. I too the mainspring out, checked again for endshake and if the pin moves freely, and cleaned everything. Usually when installing the mainspring I would use some barrel grease on the barrel walls, install the spring and put a 2-3 drops of D-5 oil on top of the wound spring and in the places where the arbor sits. This time I took the spring and applied a ultra this coat of Molykote Dx paste on the whole spring, before installing it in to the barrel, and added some oil to the arbor as usual. 

The result improved, at a full wind the balance produces about 230-237 deg. @JohnR725 I'm getting closer to 300 😃

 

What I am noticing, there is a fluctuation in amplitude. With time it would rise and drop about total 8-10 deg in an interval about 2 minutes. I assumed this ruled out the power transfer from the barrel itself. So I took the gear train out, cleaned and lubed. 

Edited by swiss2k
Posted
23 minutes ago, swiss2k said:

I too the mainspring out,

On 4/22/2024 at 9:44 AM, swiss2k said:

Main spring. Is new. Not an original Omega, but I did get it from Cousins, and they advertised it as "the one". Also checked the measurement, and those were same to Omega`s.

as you took the mainspring out what did it look like? It's amazing how much amplitude you can get if the mainspring actually has the proper shape.

last week I was doing a 12 size Hamilton and was very much surprised with the beautiful back curvature the mainspring had. Then the watch had a really nice amplitude the group would be so proud it was 350 until I dropped the lift angle down to 38 that drop the amplitude quite a bit below 300. then with the beautiful back curve it still had really nice amplitude the next day. I really wish all my mainspring's look like this as the watch had beautiful amplitude the next day. So many of the aftermarket pocketwatch Springs I see now do not have anything resembling a back curve may be a slight curve and that's about all. They still work but they just don't work as nice as a properly made spring.

then Omega as all sorts of nifty technical documentation unfortunately every single corner is watermarked with where it came from who downloaded it etc. very paranoid company. On the other hand I will snip out images like from the document on recycling a mainspring barrel. for instance here's the section on what your mainspring should look like.

image.png.2d2c79c6fc057f3bbdfc567605fc661d.png

On 4/22/2024 at 12:07 AM, swiss2k said:

The watch had some water damage

water damaged a lot of times means rust was there rust on this watch?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

@JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group.

The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original... 

 

 

Screenshot 2024-04-25 111337.png

Posted

No matter what I did, I could not get the amplitude more than 240 deg. At least there is 0.2 beat error and minus 1-2 s/d. 
So, probably not the happy end I would have hoped for, but still I think the watch turned out quite nice. You be the judge of that.

Thank you everyone for your help!
 

IMG_5686.jpeg

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, swiss2k said:

No matter what I did, I could not get the amplitude more than 240 deg. At least there is 0.2 beat error and minus 1-2 s/d. 
So, probably not the happy end I would have hoped for, but still I think the watch turned out quite nice. You be the judge of that.

6 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

has pointed out many times that the Swiss don't care about amplitude, the timekeeping is the most important.  Give yourself a  pat on the back, great beat error and timekeeping, nothing to be disappointed about. 

can I ask why you're not happy?

did you notice that the acceptable low 24 hour amplitude of this watch is 160°? is there any possibility that a watch company could manufacture a watch that could actually run at a low amplitude and keep time? so if they can run at 160° at 24 hours and keep time then they probably would keep time at 240° which yours seems to be doing?

then if you're really unhappy with this I would recommend purchasing an original Omega mainspring. Just because the aftermarket have numbers like an Omega mainspring it doesn't mean it's the same thing. Then I would also recommend replacing the escape wheel and the pallet fork. This is what they do in the Swatch group service center if they are unhappy with anything on the other hand they have an infinite supply of spare parts.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hi @JohnR725,

I would say its a happy end, the watch was in a much worser state and turned out quite nice(imho). I just hoped for a higher result after all that work. 
I agree with you, as long as it runs and keeps time, Im happy. Thank you for your advices! 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, swiss2k said:

No matter what I did, I could not get the amplitude more than 240 deg.

A nice looking watch !!

Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?

Posted
2 hours ago, Endeavor said:

A nice looking watch !!

Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?

Thank you!
 

Yes I did. I did not notice a difference. Although 9415 is advertised as a thixotropic grease (and I did had high hopes for it), the only advantage at this point I see is that its “easier” to apply than an oil (if one does not use epilame). But this is subjective, I guess.

What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement. Oil in this case is a bit more forgiving, as its super thin, and it would usually just spread out.  Again, imho.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, swiss2k said:

9415 is advertised as a thixotropic grease

47 minutes ago, swiss2k said:

What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement. Oil in this case is a bit more forgiving, as its super thin, and it would usually just spread out.  Again, imho.

The problem with oil in particular 9010 is it likes to spread. This is why you're supposed to use epilam anywhere it's used to keep the oil in place. Then you want to splurge on money you could buy 941 it's actually an oil that existed before 9415.

Then the problem with the grease yes it stays in place but if you have too much you lose amplitude. Then if you get really obsessed with this he would follow Omega's recommendation for escapement lubrication.

One of the problems with internal documents of the watch companies is typically are never going to see Them.But a few of them out in the wild for instance at this link Below I searched for the keyword of working. In particular working instructions of the Omega watch company for which there is way more than This but this is all they have. So you want to download number 40 as were going to talk about that and also download Number 81. Plus anything else that looks interesting

https://www.cousinsuk.com/document/search?SearchString=Working

Then number 40 covers lubrication of the watch. Most interesting is lubrication of the lever escapement under three different conditions with Lubrifar Which you probably no longer have has been washed off without which is what you have and then a course with epilam. Notice how they go supers super minimalistic with the 9415 because if it's too heavy you lose amplitude. Then if you lose amplitude the group will be disappointed with you and the end of the world will come.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, swiss2k said:

What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement.

I tried the Moebius 9415 from any sensible amount, down to a microscopic drop (or "super minimalistic"); the size of droplet which makes you really wonder why one would/should apply anything at all? But to no avail, consistently a lower amplitude compared to my Dr.Tillwich 1-3.

Of course, as John mentioned above, the Dr.Tillwich 1-3, just like the Moebius 9010, likes to go somewhere else. Since short however, I'm the (proud?) owner of a bottle of Moebius Fixodrop. Can't say that I'm a proud owner of the 9415.

So far, I haven't seen or discovered the "magic" of the 9415.

Meanwhile, Moebius (🤣) has my money though.........

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...