Jump to content

Caliber / maker identification? Chronograph pocketwatch.


Recommended Posts

Anybody any idea who has made this movement and perhaps a caliber-number?

Diameter outer edge 42.9 mm

I have amplitude and timing issues and may have to find a new balance staff for it 😲

IMG_3090.thumb.jpeg.95952bafc8f0bace2c0628c00447bbb1.jpeg

IMG_3095.thumb.jpeg.ad5303ccb449660420e3f97f7a258962.jpeg

IMG_3092.thumb.jpeg.91826bf7bbd447e3a65257ff70b43071.jpeg

S20240228_001.jpg.7671403a94eb4cb8430a16ab8b2f0304.jpg

S20240228_002.jpg.e227c8a9642762f5f8c612b18ac594b3.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to be a Valjoux 5. The "R" is for Reymond Freres, the original company name. They changed the name to  Valjoux in the 20s, then joined Ebauches around the 40s, after which you see the R inside the familiar shield shape.

 

Staff appears to be available.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

They changed the name to  Valjoux in the 20s

 

16 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

It’s 19 Ligne

Thank you both for this valuable information 👍

Balancestaffs.com seems to be a Dutch company (you know the saying: if it ain't Dutch, it ain't much 😂 ....... if that was only true 🫢) Not sure if they deliver to amateurs, but being Dutch myself, we can hopefully discuss that in our native language 😉

So, @nickelsilver, you think it's a 1920's watch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

So, , you think it's a 1920's watch?

It certainly could be. They were already producing wrist size movements by then, and I imagine those took off and pocket movements went down in production after that. Almost definitely pre-40s when they joined with Ebauches. Though- there are cases where movements get assembled long after the parts are produced, so you might see something odd like the R without the shield, but the watch was actually finished in 1950.

 

Balancestaffs.com will sell to anyone, very easy to deal with.

 

On edit- looking at the pics again I realized this is pin-set. For me that would make this pre-20s pretty much for sure.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balancestaffs seem to price according to supply; I have gotten staffs for less than 20 euros, most seem to be mid-20s, this one is almost double. I tend to like giving business to the supply houses that help keep watchmaking alive; but I don't think these guys are going to suffer if you buy the Ebay staff! That one does look to be correct (matches Balancestaffs' dimensions- one reason they are so helpful).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

I tend to like giving business to the supply houses that help keep watchmaking alive

Sure, I understand your admirable reasoning 👍 😉

But if you don't mind, my pension budget is limited and I like to keep my hobby alive too 😉

Thanks for your (and @JohnR725), for the excellent help 😉

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
    • A Schild movements often have left handed crown screws. A pic of the keyless works would help identify it, and the size of the movement. Looks like someone has had a, not very subtle, attempt to decrease play in the centre wheel. And the hairspring looks like it needs some work. From the scratches on the bridges, it looks like it was last serviced by a drunken baboon, but it's a good movement to practice on. Good luck 
×
×
  • Create New...