Jump to content

Seiko 5 Problem Identified...


Recommended Posts

Some of you may remember that, some weeks ago, I picked up a cheap Seiko 5 automatic for a tenner - not the nice one with the blue face that I posted about recently, a different one - and discovered that it wasn't holding a wind.

 

I took the case back off and then the rotor arm to discover that a forked spring or lever activated by the back and forward movement of the rotor isn't connecting properly with a gear wheel - and this is the gear wheel which helps to turn the ratchet wheel, etc... The gear wheel is incredibly worn and not responding to the action of the lever. You can see the offending spring on either side of the worn gear in the close-up below.

 

To replace or not to replace? The answer, for me, is no. I'll keep the movement for spares as the balance is in good order.

 

Seiko%205%20problem.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will, in order to replace the broken part the whole train wheel bridge needs to be removed I regret.

 

It is secured to the driving wheel with a little circlip which is under the train wheel bridge.

 

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries - I've just sniped a nice Seiko 5 on eBay for a tenner! It's in GWO except for a broken crystal and missing hands. All this happened 25 years ago and it's been lying in a drawer wrapped in a cloth since then.

 

So. I can decide how I want to play this. My guess is I'll take the hands (they match) from the first one and refurbish the one I've just sniped - and I have another one in the offing on eBay...

 

It'll end up being a Seiko FrankenFive!

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries Will...Just find a good Wheel on eBay ( the rotor and his train Wheel ) and you will restart your Seiko 5... a good friend here had a movement for mine ( 6119C ) My movement was missing all the automatic train Wheel and the smal spring that retain the ratchet Wheel, now my Watch works very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 at 20° C) than 9504 (305 at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease.
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
×
×
  • Create New...