Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On opening the barrel of a Lancashire Watch Co Ltd pocket watch I found that the spring had snapped about 1cm from the arbour. I'd be grateful for advice as to how to go about creating a slot at the start of the remainder of the spring so it can be connected to the arbour - I imagine creating and shaping an appropriate hole in spring steel is not that straightforward. (I bought the watch, which is incomplete & in very poor condition, for a few pounds intending to use it as a 'learning' piece. There is nothing to identify the watch other than the company name on the dial (which is of badly cracked & chipped enamel) and "No. 85590" engraved in script on the barrel bridge.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi if this is to be used for playing with to learn then trying the spring repair is ok .. first remove rather rest of the spring from the barrel  then anneal about 1 to 1 /2 cm from the end  then drill a hole in the spring and reshape with a needle file.. with round nosed pliers re curve the spring end to receive the arbour . The end without the arbour should fit round the arbour hole in the barrel. Not a difficult procedure but time consuming.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2024 at 9:36 PM, watchweasol said:

Hi if this is to be used for playing with to learn then trying the spring repair is ok .. first remove rather rest of the spring from the barrel  then anneal about 1 to 1 /2 cm from the end  then drill a hole in the spring and reshape with a needle file.. with round nosed pliers re curve the spring end to receive the arbour . The end without the arbour should fit round the arbour hole in the barrel. Not a difficult procedure but time consuming.

Thanks for the advice. Just to be sure: to anneal I heat the area to cherry red & then allow it to cool? After creating the hole do I restore the 'spring' character of the metal by re-heating and then quenching ? Re RH123's comment, does one treat the metal similarly before (& after?) using a mainspring punch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome Gary, enjoy the forum.
    • There is a known fault with the 3135 which is if the watch has not been serviced the Auto rotor can wear. See attached pic.    
    • How do I check that?
    • I sort of am expecting that ring to push against the rim of the crystal and possibly a seal against the front of the case. Hence everything comes out the back. Nothing else seems to make sense to me. I am trying to imagine why the crystal would not push out unless the ring needs to be backed off to allow the crystal to be pushed out, but then how does the ring come out? I am new to stripping watches though and am happy to stand corrected. 🙂 
    • Hi @Roll1ex, welcome to the forum. It's considered good practice to introduce yourself to the forum in this thread: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/forum/23-introduce-yourself-here/ But no worries. I don't have the spec sheet for the 15xx movements, but when I look at the 31xx information, it stands out that the endshake of the rotor should be between 0.01 and 0.03mm. That is LESS than the pallet fork and the lowest of all endshakes in the movement. Not exactly sure what you mean by that. The rotor itself is a unique part which doesn't have different heights. If you mean the height at which it is installed vis-a-vis the automatic bridge, then yes, that can be adjusted a bit via the two jewels that hold the rotor axle. Height differences vis-a-vis the bridge can also be caused by the strength with which the new axle is hammered/riveted into the rotor. And yes, that can be compensated a bit via the jewels.   This would probably indicate that the axle isn't perfectly perpendicular to the rotor. That could explain why the weight is closer to the rest of the movement at 9 o'clock -- it would then be furthest at 3 o'clock. That would be bad news. A new axle should then be installed... and properly this time.   As I wrote already, there is margin for adjustment via the jewels. As for the spring clip, the 15xx movements only seems to have one spring clip thickness (part 7911 - https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/2878_Rolex 1530 Pages 6-10.pdf). The later 31xx movments have several versions with different thicknesses. But there is a good chance that the clip is worn (=thinner than it should) and should then be replaced.   But, in conclusion, if the rotor hits the caseback in one particular postion, then my first suspicion is that the axle wasn't punched in at a perfect 90° angle. That must first be re-done correctly. No other fixes will be solving that problem. Furthermore, if the rotor "dings" against the caseback when the watch is shaken (but not in other situations), then there is likely also an issue of endshake (more an issue of the jewels) or lateral play (more likely the sping clip).      PS: by whom? Independent or RSC? 
×
×
  • Create New...