Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a question about collet size. How far off can you be with material size? Like if my material is 1.8mm can a 2mm collet be used or will that slightly damage it? 

Posted

Happy to be corrected if wrong. My understanding (I have a lathe but too many other projects on the go) is that there is no wiggle room hence why we get 0.1 increments between collets, though most you will commonly see are jumps of 0.2mm. I think that it would be expensive for sizes a watchmaker would rarely use, e.g. the full current shaublin range of collets contains around 74.

@nickelsilver and @jdrichard are probably our most prolific current lathe users and might confirm.

 

Tom

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Lukebgb said:

I have a question about collet size. How far off can you be with material size? Like if my material is 1.8mm can a 2mm collet be used or will that slightly damage it? 

in the ideal perfect world you want your lathe collet to be the right size for the material so when you close it closes parallel to the materialist holding.if the object is either too big or too small when you close the collet will end up not holding parallel very likely it will still hold but the jaws will no longer be parallel possibly springing the collet. I'm not sure what the long-term effect of a sprung collet is because anytime you purchase one used more than likely somebody is had to tighten a little tighter to hold something that was either too small or too big. Other than all of this will probably just cause alignment issues especially if you would like to remove the object and put it back in again getting it back in without wobbling is going to be an issue.

Posted
16 hours ago, Lukebgb said:

I have a question about collet size. How far off can you be with material size? Like if my material is 1.8mm can a 2mm collet be used or will that slightly damage it? 

The better the fit as they say. You can see looking at the back taper where the most tension and hold is on a collet as its drawn into the spindle. Any part of the material inside the collet that is not held tight is going to have some wiggle room. That movement is going to transfer to the working end, how much is dependent on how much of it is actually held. If you are going to risk it bring something up with the tailstock  so you have both ends held.

Posted

The only way to get round your problem is to use an ER collet adapter and ER collets  because they have a better clamping range, if you use the wrong size collet ,if to big it will only clamp the stock at the front of the collet conversely if stock to big for collet it will only grip at back of collet both will cause runout and possibly damage the collet.

Dell

IMG_2164.jpeg.0996ba65568e36462208d72bf6d7ea1f.jpeg

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...