Jump to content

Remembrance tricks


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Waggy said:

I've come across a few movements where the person before me has scratched in numbers on the plates, in a huge size... seeing this you know you are in for a rollercoaster ride of a repair/refurb.

So far its looking ok , just one dial foot that had an attempted gluing back on. But 4 service marks on the caseback, i just thought the deep scratch marks were a bit extreme when each end piece could have been popped in a labelled container.

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

Repairers used all sorts of practices/ ideas. What the customer couldn't see the repairer got away with.      

Just us ocd hobbyists that get upset about it years later, its not exactly a Patek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/7/2023 at 10:08 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

But 4 service marks on the caseback, i just thought the deep scratch marks were a bit extreme when each end piece could have been popped in a labelled container.

I agree, there's no excuse not to put them in individual marked pots. I don't even scratch a service date into a caseback, because if you think about it, who does that benefit? The customer can never see it to tell when the watch was last serviced. The invoice will tell them that and most of the time it's not just a date, which means nothing to the next guy servicing the watch. It just devalues the watch as a whole by scratching anything anywhere on a case or movement, but I'm a bit of  a purist when it comes to stuff like that

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/7/2023 at 11:08 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Just us ocd hobbyists that get upset about it years later, its not exactly a Patek.

I try to think of every watch I work on as invaluable as it very well could be to the owner (which is mostly myself 😉), but I get you!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

I try to think of every watch I work on as invaluable as it very well could be to the owner (which is mostly myself 😉), but I get you!

I think its best not to pick up any bad habits regardless of what watch it might be. A short cut attitude can become the norm if you let it get out of control.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon said:

I agree, there's no excuse not to put them in individual marked pots. I don't even scratch a service date into a caseback, because if you think about it, who does that benefit? The customer can never see it to tell when the watch was last serviced. The invoice will tell them that and most of the time it's not just a date, which means nothing to the next guy servicing the watch. It just devalues the watch as a whole by scratching anything anywhere on a case or movement, but I'm a bit of  a purist when it comes to stuff like that

A certain watch shop I know, writes a code in the case back with a permanent marker (sharpie).  They keep a database of the codes so that they can record the service history. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon said:

I agree, there's no excuse not to put them in individual marked pots. I don't even scratch a service date into a caseback, because if you think about it, who does that benefit? The customer can never see it to tell when the watch was last serviced. The invoice will tell them that and most of the time it's not just a date, which means nothing to the next guy servicing the watch. It just devalues the watch as a whole by scratching anything anywhere on a case or movement, but I'm a bit of  a purist when it comes to stuff like that

There was more on the dial side on the retention plates for the date ring. Maybe the guy was old  and just had a crappy memory, couldn't be bothered to write notes or sketches or label up separately.  It's an old mid 50's design movement so before photographing was such an easy process, we take that for granted these days. Poor old guy might have had a dozen watches stripped down on his bench, struggling to make a living and here we are slagging him off 60 years later 😅.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi. Exactly so NEW,  when I started there was no videos , no internet. What you learnt was from the few books you could lay your hands on  and working on old watches and clocks.  There were no scopes cameras and no high magnification it was all done with a loupe. I got my bits from. T.G Loaders,  watchmakers supply co or AG Thomas by snail mail although it was faster than today’s post as long as Dick Turpin was on holiday.  You made mistakes of course but as parts were hard to get and a long wait not many. The old adage.   Measure twice. Cut once.      Today we have a vast array of help, plentiful access to parts and  books, tools we all take for granted. So spare a thought for the old guys of long ago and not so long ago trying to make a living.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I totally agree, no one realised in the past that things were difficult, it was as it was.  We all remember the Yellow Pages or other nationalities equivalents, we knew no better or at least had no other option.  The Internet has made searching things much easier and videos to watch, instead of 2d drawings are a great help, also cheap ( at least relatively) microscopes, make life easier.  The skills of watch repair though, haven't changed for hundreds of years. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi the skills are the same but partaking in the horological art has got much simpler interning terms  of information and teaching guides. We had none of Marks courses back then  it was down to brain power and observation.

I often think about my dad fixing watches every day. No camera, no videos, no internet...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi the skills are the same but partaking in the horological art has got much simpler interning terms  of information and teaching guides. We had none of Marks courses back then  it was down to brain power and observation.

I have nothing but admiration for you and your ilk. How you learned is great anathema to me. 

I have 3 books on watchmaking and have not understood beyond the foreword. Even now, after two years of practice I struggle. I have always learned visually and physically. I see, I learn, I do, I learn. YouTube and the internet courses have allowed me to understand and at this stage be able to work on watches , not with great skill yet, but as a result I can practice what is preached by others.

Thank goodness for you and colleagues of your standing who give so much to us novices. Don't stop.

Regards

 Toss

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

I have 3 books on watchmaking and have not understood beyond the foreword.

I have to agree with you here. Understanding books by for example De Carle and Fried takes quite a bit of effort, and some of the material is no longer relevant or relevant to the areas you are currently interested in. Also, as a beginner, it's difficult to assess what's relevant and what's not depending on current practices and what you're trying to accomplish. Without the Internet, I'm not at all sure I would have managed to get as far as I have.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

Without the Internet, I'm not at all sure I would have managed to get as far as I have.

Agree completely with your comments, if I get stuck my first point of call is an internet/YouTube search, followed closely by a post here, whilst I am waiting for one of the gurus on here to respond I will turn to the books. The other way I use the books is to dig a little deeper on something I already understand (or think I do!). So I use the books as a learning tool or backup to the internet, If I had to learn something new from them I'd find it very difficult if not impossible.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great idea - but can access to this thread or the list be restricted to member only somehow? Or move it to a new category linked from here, and make that category members only? At the moment the list - with all the real names & contact info - is totally unprotected and accessible to any spambot or other malicious webscapers, which is rather worrying. (Just tried it with a different browser & via proxy in the US - this thread and the list are fully public, at present).  
    • I've been programming, building electronics for, repairing and retrofitting machine tools and industrial automation systems for over 40 years now. I could have retired, but I always have work queued up - and I still enjoy it; also building electronics, robots and animatronics (among other things) as hobbies. There is a vast range of work in machine tool / robotics / industrial automation field, and not all that many really good people, who fully understand the electronics and software side, rather than having been forced in to it from the mechanical side & struggling with anything to do with electronics or software. I can't help with the qualifications side - things have changed too much over the years, & I started my business before I left school. At the time I was getting criticised and even penalised by teachers for spending too much time on the school "computer" (a massive early programmable calculator, really) because computers & programming were a waste of time, according to them!   One big problem I am aware of is that a lot of university courses have little to no correlation to real-world industrial machines and equipment - most of the equipment in the field that needs work is old! You have to be an enthusiast and study older system and techniques; it's no good knowing the state of the art electronics & software inside out when you are more likely to be working on a 50 year old machine than a brand new one. The oldest machine I routinely work on was made in 1911; many are from the 1950s - 80s. New machines tend to be under warranties or service contracts, so only the makers agents ever touch them - it's the older gear that gets sold on after it's showing its age and really needs actual engineers!  
    • I got this set from Cousins. I believe the arbors are steel and it's been working very well. Not all Chinese sets are the same. Some a decent and some are crap. My most appreciated mainspring winder is my Master Craft Mainspring Winder:  
    • 👍I  like modifications that work.
    • Excellent advice!  Mainspring winders are generally a nightmare. In order to be absolutely sure that they work, they must be adapted for specific calibres. Sure, you can build up a collection of winders over time, but it's expensive and time-consuming and you still can't be sure that any of the ones you have in your collection will fit. When I was new, I considered buying Bergeon's large universal set because I thought it would cover all situations, but that's not the case. The risks of hand winding a mainspring are often exaggerated. With the right technique and training, the risks are not much greater than with a winder. Moreover, if the spring has a T-shaped bridle, you may not even get it into the barrel. Here is an excellent description by a professional how to hand wind: Yes, a well-established practice among professional repairers is to always replace the spring even when it is in good condition. Personally, I think it is an unnecessary cost because modern springs last a very long time. Some fatigue occurs over time but if you are unsure, you can always test the power reserve. It is also an unnecessary risk to replace a spring if it is still in good condition. If an original spring is not available, it is not certain that the alloy in a generic spring corresponds to the properties of the original spring. This seems to be particularly true for some Japanese movements, especially Seiko and Orient. For any Swiss movement, I'd say the risk is non-existent.
×
×
  • Create New...