Jump to content

The CYMA Sonomatic


Recommended Posts

I’ve spent a bit of time learning about alarm clocks- particularly the higher end Swiss ones- as an inexpensive way of learning about complications.

Here’s my CYMA Sonomatic: a fairly rare alarm clock introduced in 1958. The ‘Elite’ model featured here was priced at 15 Guineas (£15 15 0 in British pre decimal days, I believe) at the time. About a week’s wages for a skilled factory worker at the time.

It’s an 8 day movement which is quite unique as the alarm itself is also an 8 day one, overcoming the limitation of all other mechanical alarms which will completely run down its mainspring unless manually stopped. On the Sonomatic, the alarm will sound for a few seconds every 12 hours and then automatically shut off (thus, no good for heavy sleepers!) It should sound up to 19 times on one wind. 

There’s very little on the ‘net about these so to assist others working on this calibre, I’ve posted some images of the strip down intended to show the movement and particularly the unique automatic alarm shut off mechanism.  Basically it is a cam with a small pin that makes a single revolution and then acts against the disconnect lever to stop the alarm. 

Within an hour or so, the hour wheel pushes the disconnect lever down a little further, eliminating the resistance against the cam pin, and so the spring loaded cam springs forward a few degrees and is ready for the next alarm cycle. That is, if it’s set up correctly.

It took me a while to figure out the set up as when I rebuilt it, the cam pin would briefly depress the disconnect lever then carry on revolving so the alarm would not shut off. The trick is to adjust the disconnect lever sideways to ensure just enough resistance to stop the cam. The disconnect lever is quite sophisticated but the two screws holding it in place can be accessed easily from the dial side (top marks for design!)  and then adjusted. With quite a bit of trisl and error, it’s now working perfectly. 
 

 

IMG_6474.jpeg

IMG_6473.jpeg

IMG_6475.jpeg

IMG_6481.jpeg

IMG_6484.jpeg

IMG_6485.jpeg

IMG_6486.jpeg

IMG_6501.jpeg

IMG_6504.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The photos were taken during disassembly. Like all of these clocks I’ve looked at, filthy dirty. I doubt it’s been serviced in 30 years. The oil was so old it had turned green! The third wheel pivots were so gummed up the clock barely ran at all. 

I agree about the build quality and design. The movement is almost completely silent unlike the loud tick of lower quality clocks. 

Edited by Bill241
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi. Along with the Swiza movements these were good quality for alarm clocks. It will clean up very well. Use Windles clock oil on the rebuild is the best for clocks.

I haven’t worked on a Swiza yet- some inventive designs, certainly, but I’m not a fan of pin levers or the alarm/movement running off a single spring. I prefer CYMA, Looping (particularly the cal. 50-55) and Imhof from the 50s-70s period as they are more like pocket watches than clocks. They are usually very cheap to buy- I recently bought the smaller version of the Sonomatic, with calendar, for £6.

I avoid the prewar alarm clocks and 8 day timepieces having read the Horological Journal articles on the dangers of radium dials! 

For lubrication I tend to use HP1300, 9020 and 941 for the escape wheel/pallets with a thick grease like DX or 8300 on the barrel arbor pivots. I’ll get some Windles though as I do occasionally work on larger clocks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think maybe we're all a bit dim @ManSkirtBrew 🤣 99% of the time I'm working with the 0.5X Barlow, so mags from 3.5X to 22.5X. When I need a close up of a pivot or jewel, I take the Barlow out, and even put in the 2X Barlow, but it's a nuisance. So like you, I had that D'oh moment, why don't I just use 20X eyepieces (WF20X/10). They take seconds to change, and you keep the working distance. The only downsides are lower field of view, and less brightness.  
    • At the lowest magnification, I can just get all of a normal wristwatch size movement in field. For some things it's too much magnification, but the nice thing about the eyepieces is they only take seconds to swap in and out. I'm genuinely surprised I've never read about anyone else doing it, to be honest.
    • I've attached two photographs - the watch case looks like it needs the crown to extend into the case to pick up the stem if that makes sense
    • The K&D (Levin made the same style too, probably others as well) are a clever design and work well when you get used to them. The only issue is if you wind the spring so that the tongue goes in, there's a really good chance it slips futher and then comes out  the next slot, usually breaking off. Best to size it so you can fit it in the barrel with the tongue sticking out.
    • I guess that's me... I work with various pumps, motors, sensors, computers, PCBs, and lots of code and chemistry. Couldn't tell you much about life with a mechatronics degree, as I've never heard the term before. My degree is in Entrepreneurship, and I bootstrapped all the technical stuff (my superpower). On the face of it, it sounds like mechatronics is the better way to go between the two, but it seems hard to imagine a mech E degree without a lot of code and electronics these days...   Whatever happened with his CS project, btw?
×
×
  • Create New...