Jump to content

Newbie confusion...movement to match dial.

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

My first post here and hoping for help, reassurance, and perhaps a pat on the shoulder. I'm restoring an old Pulsar Pepsi diver Y563a-707H that has a bad movement (stutters). Of course, the watch is so old an exact new replacement for that movement (Y563a)  is not available from the usual sources, but the ETA 805.122 is listed as compatible. OK, I bought the ETA. These are pretty inexpensive low grade quartz movements so there was little risk.

Well ran into my first problem... the dial feet on my Pulsar dial are in the wrong position for the ETA. So I have 3 options to deal with this incompatibility -

1. Find a generic dial with the correct feet placement for the ETA movement. I've looked, nothing really that works with a Pepsi diver.

2.  having someone clip the feet off my Pulsar dial and glue new ones in the correct position for the ETA. That seems like it would be expensive. I know there are "dial dots" but I'm told don't use them as the eventually jam up the day/date ring.

3,  Find a used pulsar movement. Searching and I think I may be on to something. It a Pulsar watch Y563-8559 . Am I right in assuming this would be the same movement as in my watch and therefore the dial feet position would be the same? (and that the "8559" only refers to a case style?). I see that these 2 watches use different model stems, but I'm hoping that only is a cosmetic change in the crown. 

So what do you guys think...Am I on the right path? Many, many thanks for all your help and suggestions!




Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would go with option 2, you could even give this a go yourself, there are several youtube videos on how to do this, and the equipment isn't too expensive - but I would experiment on an old dial first until you get your technique down. you can just wiggle off hte old feet with your tweezers... like a 5year old with a wobbly tooth 🙂

You can then use the tool (comes as a complete kit for $50 ish) below to mill a little circular recess in the back of the dial and then glue the new dial foot in place, either super glue or 2 part epoxy


Or you can solder new feet on using a set up similar to the one below:


Advantage is that if this fails, you can still try the other options

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response,

I think my best route is keep looking for a replacement movement that uses the same stem for my case. I think buying tools and parts for a one time use isn't economic. Besides, I don't see how you can accurately position the new feet. Either new feet or soldering would be too much handling for a newbie like me that would destroy the dial.  I'm kind of surprised that when I look at Youtube vids regarding customizing movements and dials, no one mentions foot alignment. It seems to me that is one very critical step. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2023 at 8:52 PM, Califlefty said:

Am I right in assuming this would be the same movement as in my watch and therefore the dial feet position would be the same? (and that the "8559" only refers to a case style?).

I'm pretty certain that that is the numbering convention that Pulsar uses.

A little Googlefoo suggests that the Hattori VX63 might be a drop in replacement though, although I haven't found any thing about dial feet positions yet. That being said at only £4.75 +vat and shipping from Cousins it wouldn't exactly be an expensive exercise to just buy one and try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Same as @Waggy go for option2 buy the refitting leg tool and use the original dial. 

this tool is not expensive as you can see and it's very useful. I glue the leg with epoxy but other glue can be used.

If you fell that it's too complicated you can go also for very simple double sided sticker to fix the dial like this https://www.amazon.com/USHOBE-Stickers-Sticker-Double-Sided-Double-Side/dp/B0CFNFG5K6

it's less watchmaker style but it's doing the job

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you live in the UK then you can take the exams at Upton Hall at BHI head quarters in Nottinghamshire UK.  Since I live in the US, I found an invigilator in my town, approved by the BHI exams supervisor, to manage my exams here locally.  My invigilator will receive the exam material and provide it to me at the appropriate day for the designated amount of time I have to perform the test.   In the higher level courses there are some that you must take at Upton Hall in person (D9, D11, D16, D18 and D20). You can find more information here   https://bhi.co.uk/training-education/examinations/    I still have to decide what level I want to achieve, but know my understanding of horology has greatly improved by the material I have covered thus far in this course.  
    • Yes. I understand (now). I regret to say that I am servicing watches without fulling understanding the cannon pinion function in relation with setting the time  (and many other theory aspects of the orology!!!). If is too tight the hands won't move and on the contrary. If the pallet fork is not installed the train of wheels will spin freely and if the remontoir is on the setting position the motion wheels will also move. I will use HP 1300 for the cannon pinion setting. I am happy and grateful and of course I will report back as soon as I can. Thanks   
    • Hi Fernando, read carefully what @eccentric59 wrote, it is the key to You problem. Lubricate the cannon pinion. Take care to understand what is it's function. When You set time, the train doesn't move, but only the cannon pinion moves. Put hte lever back in it's place, it has nothing to do with time setting
    • Hi fernando. Let us know how you get on.
    • OK, in You case You will assemble the movement with the line attached to the barrel and fusee and will  wind the line  entirely on the barrel after that. It is important when replacing the line to know the correct lenght of the line. The rule is that when line wound on the fudsee entirely, about 1/4 turn still to remain on the barrel. Yes, no tension. The ratchet is not placed yet, the spring in the barrel is complitelly unwound. At the end of the step the fusee is empty and the line is attached to it and strained perpendiculary to it, not on tangent. The escape wheel. Use whatever that will not damage anything. Yes, this is typing mistake, sorry. The word 'pendulum' here is not correct, You should use 'anchor' and yes, it is removed from the movement at this point, according my instruction 1 (Ihave used the word 'lever' there):   Ok, let sey the barrel arbour makes 6 full turns when winding the spring in the barrel from unwound to fully wound state of the spring. Let sey that the barrel makes 4.5 full turns when winding the clock from fully unwound (the line is on the barrel) to fully wound (the line is on the fusee) state. This means that You should not wind the spring in the barlel when adjusting the initial tension to more than 1.5 turns of the arbour of the barrel.  If You make 2 full turns, then when winding the clock, the barrel will be able to turn to only 4 turns, so the limiting device will not limit the rotation of the fusee arbour and You will be able to force the line much more than when the limiting device acts, also the power reserve will be less. Hope this is clear now... Yes, but again - not the pendulum, but the anchour.   About the loosing time... In this kind of escapement, the frequency pritty much depends on the torque. The higher torque - the highrer frequency. This is because this escapement forces the pendulum to oscillate significantly faster than it's own resonant fequency. The frequency depends on the 'depth' of the escapement too - the deeper escapement is, the lower the frequency, and the higher amplitude of pendulum oscillations. The heavier the pendulum is, the harder to the movement (the escapement torque) to force the pendulum to oscillate faster than it's own frequency. And in the end, the own pendulum frequency depends only on the pendulum lenght and a little on the suspension spring 'strenght' This are all the relations between all the factors. You can try to use the old spring (if it is not broken) and see if the clock will work faster with it. Yes, the old springs of fusee clocks sometimes give bigger torque than modern ones, no matter if they seem to be 'set' You can shorten the pendulum to achieve correct frequency. If the torque is reduced, but enough for the movement to work reliably,  then reduced torque will only lead to lessen the wear. The torque in fusee movements is more or less constant all the time, this is the function of the fusee. You can use the Clock Tuner  free app for android to adjust faster the clock rate. You will need to know the BPH of the movement, so count the teeth of the wheels and pinions and calculate the BPH
  • Create New...