Jump to content

1971 Bulova Accutron Spaceview 214


Recommended Posts

Just got this guy from the eBay. Purchased as "for repair." First thing I notice is the contact spring in the battery hatch is missing. My dad recently asked me to repair his non-running Spaceview and it turned out that was the entire problem with his, so I put the world's tiniest ball of tin foil in there and what do you know.

Looks like a good service is all it needs!

 

20231002161036971.jpg

20231002160730830.jpg

20231002161222865.jpg

One more quick note: according to the list from myBulova, this is a factory Spaceview. Nice!

20231002165012198.thumb.jpg.47a170bc09b6c8b8cb8ff7b35d8182f5.jpg

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
Pressed the wrong button
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

While cleaning up the case, I polished out the crystal, then gave it a wipe with a paper towel.

And that's how I learned that despite being on the inside of the crystal, the Accutron logo wipes right off with a little soap and water 🫤 I should have been more careful, but live and learn.

I'm not too heartbroken, as the crystal has some pretty bad cracks and deep scratches, and I was planning to replace it anyway.

I have to say, I still love the results of a quick polish on the wheel with red rouge. Here's a before and after of two Accutron crystals. This was all of 5 minutes' work.

before.thumb.jpg.75b9a6bbbce5a566457425814032301e.jpgafter.thumb.jpg.893b9c0dc0f185219c4f7fba5addc842.jpg

Cleaned up and back together. Unfortunately, the lugs measure 17,mm, while all the straps I have are 18mm.

I have a suspicion this watch was treated roughly and the lugs may be bent, but I'm not brave enough to try bending them back.

shiny.thumb.jpg.36024267768b2dc28b8a085ceceafca2.jpg20231011_213013.thumb.jpg.c2e140d1619ce063c76f195ada91d88f.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was buying straps for the Oberon I recently refurbished, I got a 1-piece black leather strap, but it didn't work with the chunky Oberon case.

Turns out it fits between the lugs of the Spaceview and looks pretty sweet.

What I'd really like is a rally style strap, but they're impossible to find in 17mm.

I also noticed the watch is gaining 20-30 minutes a day. So I'll have to address that at some point.

20231014_214504.thumb.jpg.a5fb6204ac2e2f33c349e8614b3463df.jpg20231014_214459.thumb.jpg.4b9c86bbd359d3c443ff3b38ca012e05.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 218 can pretty much always be phased to work with 1.55v batteries, but the 214 is trickier. Some of the forks just have too much amplitude and no amount of adjusting will keep it from picking up extra teeth. There, the old solution was to change the fork, but those days are long gone. Now there are reduced voltage batteries with a tiny added circuit to bring the voltage down to the original 1.35v. Accucell   There's a little drop in run time since the battery itself is smaller than original to accommodate the circuit. You don't want to use a zinc-air 1.35v cell, these vent and I don't remember the specifics but they aren't good for watches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

The watch wasn't keeping time well. It hums, but I noticed the second hand hanging up and it looked like the second hand was hitting the inside of the crystal. I opened it up and sure enough the second hand is sitting at a weird angle. It looks like it worked its way up off the center pivot.

 

So a question for those experienced with the 214:

On the 218/219 you can engage the hack to make it less likely to hurt the index wheel by inadvertently turning the hands during installation. Is there anything I should do on the 214 other than be extra careful? This is not the railroad approved version so I don't think there's a hack, but I'm still very new to 214s so I figured I'd ask.

The repair manual helpfully suggests:

image.png.fb784fd8621a2415b58483438e336654.png

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
Typing is hard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really want to be careful, turn both the index and pawl fingers away from the jndex wheel, then fit on the second hand. Now it'll be absolutely safe to adjust the second hand to clear the minute hand and the crystal.

Then comes the painful part of phasing the watch again. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I EXTREMELY carefully pressed the seconds hand firmly back on, so fingers crossed.

While I had it apart, I took the opportunity to press the Spaceview crystal back in, and I have a vintage Caravelle rally strap on its way to me.

I do not get tired of how beautiful this watch is.

IMG_20240416_164811.thumb.jpg.552681046b9a7fca303f6b753614a41c.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...