Jump to content

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, brunomartins said:

Hi!

After cleaning my watch, this issue appeared. When setting hours the second hand has some movement.

What may cause this? Too much tight hands?

The image shows the problem

B0346B44-18B4-401F-8862-696BDB16F2D4.gif

The second hand moving backwards when setting the time backwards is quite common. I'm not sure i would call it an issue. Just tried it on my 2 year old seiko 5 and the second hand stops while i set the time. The main reason i always set the time forwards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brunomartins said:

Yes it slow down a little bit. Amplitude around 190

So the next test would be to remove the hr, min and seconds hands and repeat the test you did before;

If didn't slow down the oscilator, its the hand tubes that rub.

if did , the fault is with the canon pinion and/ or minute gear, tight canon pinion ....etc. 

You already have the canon pinion mounted on center arbour, so it needs not to be broached, just add a bit of oil on center arbour and turn the crown, this will reduce friction there and if you remove/ clean the oil/ grease the center arbour your done.

Stuttering seconds hand can be moved anti clock, but something must move it back, which takes us to faults said above.

 

 

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the sweep seconds pinion sits inside the centre wheel, if there isn't enough tension on the friction spring, then the pinion may lose contact with the wheel driving it, then moving the hands (i.e. centre wheel) will move the seconds hand.  Does it do it if you have the face downwards?

a.thumb.jpg.2c9f2ebaea2111db54049146995507f6.jpg

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2023 at 4:47 PM, brunomartins said:

Yes it slow down a little bit. Amplitude around 190

 

2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

 then the pinion may lose contact with the wheel driving it, then moving the hands (i.e. centre wheel) will move the seconds hand.  

 How does loss of contact between the pinion and driving wheel expalin the slowing down of the oscilator ?    which only slows when setting the hands.

Rgds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, brunomartins said:

Just to update I manage to test with hands off and could not tell difference 

So the culprit is  NOT the hands tube rubbing .

I made a mistake in my previous post,

I said " its the hand"       should have said  " its not the hands "          

 

So , CANON PINION IS TIGHT.   Being already mounted on center tube means theres a good chance broaching is not needed, presuming you have lubricated the CANON PINION-CENTER TUBE , advancing the hands like 10 times round the clock should wipe out that  excess friction, thus you should gain back considerable amplitude and  seconds hand should no longer go back either. 

Rgds

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2023 at 1:07 PM, brunomartins said:

After cleaning my watch, this issue appeared

I know you said you cleaned your watch, but I'm not going to make the assumption that you have serviced and properly lubricated it.

If you look at the third wheel on this Rolex 1215 (in the giff I posted) which drives the sweep second pinion (which isn't in situ), you'll find this moves quite a bit when setting the hands anti-clockwise, which in turn will always move the sweep second pinion regardless of how much tension you put on the brake spring. This is because the gear train is being moved when setting the hands anti-clockwise which strongly infers that the centre wheel is being turned via the cannon pinion and the whole gear train as well, thus a drop in amplitude and sometimes brings the movement to a complete stop. This is either the centre wheel not being lubricated properly, or/and the cannon pinion being slightly too tight on the centre wheel. Some like to have the movement come to a complete standstill as this is a type of 'hack'. I call it a 'poor man's hack'. The hand moving backward isn't such a big problem and you'll find that happens with other movements.

I'm guessing you didn't replace the mainspring, as a good amount of power/torque from the mainspring through the gear train will massively help overcome this, also, as I've already said, a well-lubricated centre wheel before the cannon pinion goes on and the correct tightness of the cannon pinion will also alleviate this. If you have a low amplitude, it suggests the mainspring needs replacing. If you haven't got at least 270 to 280 degrees amplitude, there is very little that you can do to solve this, as broaching the cannon pinion will only make the hand-setting sloppy.

That's why I initially asked about servicing and lubricating properly and this is why I bang on about changing the mainspring as standard because you are trying to diagnose and solve a problem when it was screaming at you all along. Not enough power from the mainspring!

Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon said:

I know you said you cleaned your watch, but I'm not going to make the assumption that you have serviced and properly lubricated it.

If you look at the third wheel on this Rolex 1215 (in the giff I posted) which drives the sweep second pinion (which isn't in situ), you'll find this moves quite a bit when setting the hands anti-clockwise, which in turn will always move the sweep second pinion regardless of how much tension you put on the brake spring. This is because the gear train is being moved when setting the hands anti-clockwise which strongly infers that the centre wheel is being turned via the cannon pinion and the whole gear train as well, thus a drop in amplitude and sometimes brings the movement to a complete stop. This is either the centre wheel not being lubricated properly, or/and the cannon pinion being slightly too tight on the centre wheel. Some like to have the movement come to a complete standstill as this is a type of 'hack'. I call it a 'poor man's hack'. The hand moving backward isn't such a big problem and you'll find that happens with other movements.

I'm guessing you didn't replace the mainspring, as a good amount of power/torque from the mainspring through the gear train will massively help overcome this, also, as I've already said, a well-lubricated centre wheel before the cannon pinion goes on and the correct tightness of the cannon pinion will also alleviate this. If you have a low amplitude, it suggests the mainspring needs replacing. If you haven't got at least 270 to 280 degrees amplitude, there is very little that you can do to solve this, as broaching the cannon pinion will only make the hand-setting sloppy.

That's why I initially asked about servicing and lubricating properly and this is why I bang on about changing the mainspring as standard because you are trying to diagnose and solve a problem when it was screaming at you all along. Not enough power from the mainspring!

Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp.gif

I didn't put it quite as detailed or as eloquently as you Jon , but i did kinda say its quite common. Did anyone listen ? 🤣

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Jobbers would have hard time convincing the watch owner to accept this.

 

 

A new mainspring, a strong amplitude, good service with proper lubrication, and a perfect cannon pinion tightness, then there would be no need for any explanation, as there wouldn't be any movement of the second hand in this manner.... lol 

Edited by Jon
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon said:

A new mainspring, a strong amplitude, good service with proper lubrication, and a perfect cannon pinion tightness, then there would be no need for any explanation, as there wouldn't be any movement of the second hand in this manner.... lol 

👍thats a perfect test for me then, if the second hand moves backwards when setting the hand anticlockwise then I've made a crap job of the service. Probably why most of mine do that haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone ! Thanks for all valuable tips! I tried some procedures and the problem has been solved. 
Basically I removed all hands, cleaned the second pinion, replaced hour and min hands to check a proper sit of them. After this I replaced the second pinion, lubricated the pivot that makes contact with the jewel. I also pulled little the spring the elevate this pinion (not sure if this was ell done).

Finally put the second hand with more accuracy and now the second hand is working properly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Very rarely need to do this in a watch (as opposed to a clock) since usually the holes in thinner parts are jewelled and the ones that need bushing are the larger ones with more metal around them e.g. the barrel or centre wheel, but I have an example of a hammer pivot running in a thin part of the main plate of a repeater which has too much side shake and needs sorting.  Are there any tricks to doing this, or should I (reluctantly) be thinking of the domed punch - which normally I'd avoid. I'd like to add a photo but this is only really visible under the microscope and my microscope doesn't have a camera attachment.
    • JJenkins...thank you for the response. I don't believe these models have a bezel that tightens down. The crystal is removed/inserted into the top of the case using a crystal lift/remover, and fits in tightly. Once the crown and crystal are removed, the movement can be removed out the front of the case.    Geotex...thank you very much for your response. Thank you for sharing your knowledge of how the watch parts fit together, and for the tip about the groove in the case, and the washer on the crown. I'll post back on here whenever I can find the time to work on the watches.   
    • After a long delay, I finally got the shock springs reinserted! I taped down the small bridge that held the jewel to my steel riveting anvil so it wouldn't move around and that helped a lot. The spring on the main body was easy in comparison. I purchased 25 springs from H&W Perrin in Canada ($9 with shipping) and found a good fit for the one I lost. Alex has great videos, which helped me with the spring. This Westclox with a Seiko movement is fighting me every step of the way. I'm sure it was never serviced. Almost every screw was frozen and needed a good soaking. The transmission fluid/penetrating oil combo worked best. The good news is that everything is in great shape.
    • Hello all,  I'm reactivating this old thread with a question.  I've of course watched Marc's video.  I'm just wondering if that pin in the center of the anvil he's making (on the lathe to push out the bearing) is really necessary. I have an anvil that has a hole just the right size to fit the bearing and hold the rotor, but it doesn't have that center pin.  I've seen other videos online where people do without the pin.  Cheers 
    • Strange, I can find what you want on CousinsUK but nothing in the US.  
×
×
  • Create New...