Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone!
I'm currently working on a Rolex 1024 with a 1570 movement in really great condition. One thing which is a little off is however is the hairspring which I am noticing is a bit off center when the balance is mounted on the main plate. When checking out the hairspring, it seems like it's a bit kinked at the spot I have marked. However, I don't think this is the main cause for the off center profile of the entire hairspring when mounted. Can anyone with more experience see if there is something obviously wrong in another spot of the spring?

The reason I am asking is because I'm not terribly experienced on balances in specific. I feel like I am getting good at everything else but balances, I don't get to work on too often and it feels wrong to start on a Rolex hairspring /:
I don't really feel like paying for a replacement if I ruin anything haha.

Thanks in advance(:

 

IMG-5470.jpg

IMG-5492.jpg

IMG-5489.jpg

IMG-5486.jpg

Posted

Take the balance wheel off from the balance bridge. And look again. Is he centred, is he flat, and work from that point onwards on the spring. But first I would correct the bend you showed on the picture to perfection again. All withe balance removed from the bridge. Do not remove the spring from the balance itself.

  • Like 2
Posted

It is a Breguet hairspring. What you see is no touching but the coil in 2nd level (over main level).

It needs to be centered without balance wheel, hairspring mounted in cock.

However surely not recommended for unexperienced repairers!

Frank

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Posted

From the picture, I am not even sure if its a free sprung.

Young men, need to borrow your eyes.🧐

 The lower level is actually a flat H/S, and no different aproach needed  to shape it concentric either. Shape the upper level so when you fit the stud into the stud holder, it wouldn't push or pull the main level out of level or flat. You'd be adjusting the height, sometimes you can  adjust the height by high/lowering the stud in stud hole, that is  trying to avoid unneccessary bending of the hairspring.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/5/2023 at 10:16 AM, Nucejoe said:

From the picture, I am not even sure if its a free sprung

I don't suppose you see the regulator anyplace? Maybe it got misplaced in a prior repair. While some Rolex watches do have regulators most of them do not they are free sprung.

 

On 9/5/2023 at 9:37 AM, BrehmerR said:

I found a picture of what they're supposed to look like and mine is definitely a bit off. 

I found another picture.

s-l400.jpg.526ee95b0288e2375f58b86cf621440f.jpg

Then I'm having a confusion what exactly is wrong with his hairspring now? The reason I ask is you claim its offset or it looks relatively centered it's in over coil hairspring as has been explained above. Which means when the flat part of the hairspring goes to the upper part it has to crossover if you look straight down it looks like it's touching it really isn't. If you look inside ways how does it look preferably with the balance wheel in the watch not as we see it here. 

IMG-5492.jpg.c8952cbaeeec619584715845915e9edf.thumb.jpg.e8f439b1d488538e3772f01301b5aed1.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Rolex_1570

 

Posted

There is no regulator, the timing is adjusted with the 2 screws with star type head. Special tool used for this. Please note if you adjust these screws you have to adjust both of them exactly the same, other wise the balance will be out of poise, meaning you will create a heavy point on the balance band and this means there will be  serious difference in the rate over the 4 vertical positions.

This is not for a beginner to correct without a proper timing machine and theoretical knowledge. So be carefull what you are doing here. If it was  A Seiko, I would say go ahead and play. Nothing lost if you have to bin  Seiko. A Rolex is a different story, valuable and lovable. 

Have a look here for some background: https://adjustingvintagewatches.com/what-is-watch-adjusting/

Posted
1 hour ago, Ronp said:

This is not for a beginner to correct without a proper timing machine and theoretical knowledge. So be carefull what you are doing here. If it was  A Seiko, I would say go ahead and play. Nothing lost if you have to bin  Seiko. A Rolex is a different story, valuable and lovable. 

Did you notice the watch is currently in pieces way up above? Not the first time on the group somebody's working on a Rolex with no Rolex knowledge. I'm looking forward to how the hairspring turns out.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

How was it when you did the initial inspection before disassembly?
Can we see how it behaved on the timing machine / timegrapher or whatever you have before you disassembled it?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Indeed,  to many brave souls on this planet. And when all goes wrong, lossing a lot of money. In this case a new balance for 1570 could easily set you back 500+ dollars on the grey, ebay market. If you take the watch assembled again to a Rolex AD, you will have to pay for a full service and on top probably another 250 dollar for a new balance.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Ronp said:

If you take the watch assembled again to a Rolex AD, you will have to pay for a full service and on top probably another 250 dollar for a new balance.

 

On 9/5/2023 at 8:28 AM, BrehmerR said:

1570 movement

I suppose it depends upon where in the planet your authorized service provider is. But aren't they authorized only to service modern Rolex movements? So a 1570 would be classified as vintage? Vintage meeting that the normal service provider is not authorized to service it it must go back the Rolex and basically that means a heck of a lot of money if they'll even service it at all.

I was doing a quick look for something related this and here's an interesting thing on servicing vintage. So yes at one time it would've been a lot cheaper now it's expensive and no Rolex does not have to play by the rules their big enough to do whatever they feel like which they do.

https://professionalwatches.com/the-unfortunate-truth-about-vintage-rolex-repairs/

 

Posted

Can you post a picture looking at the balance installed on the balance cck looking at it under magnification uninstalled to the movement from the bottom side and installed to the movement from the side view? 

As two asides: 

- If you are attentive, a balance complete for a 1530 can be had off eBay, forums, and some dealers for $250-$400. Nothing compared with a balance for a 10XX series rolex movement. For spare parts, pay attention to FieryGems on eBay. Greater seller, reasonably priced parts. 

- I actually think messing with a Rolex 15XX, 30XX, and 31XX is more forgiving than other vintage hairsprings. Their almost pocketwatch like in the thickness and resilience - at least compared to Rolex 6XX, 7XX, 10XX and ETA's etc. 

Posted

In the Netherlands, the 1570 is normally serviced with all parts available for this movement at the local AD, no need to ship to HQ Rolex in Swiss.

250 dollars would be steal for a factory new balance in a not openend before blister. So much so called new old stock with some sign of storage is in reality an old, used part in a questionable condition. F.e. take a look on ebay vfor a vintage nos movement, how often are the screws marred. Screws do not get marred from storage but from loosing or tightening by a wrong screwdiver.

Back to the subject: Adjusting the balance spring is an art that takes much practice to hone your skills to the required level for a high quality brequet balance like a rolex 1570.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Ronp said:

In the Netherlands, the 1570 is normally serviced with all parts available for this movement at the local AD, no need to ship to HQ Rolex in Swiss.

So in the Netherlands as it would be serviced locally would it be serviced at the same cost as a newer Rolex in other words it's not considered vintage?

2 hours ago, Ronp said:

take a look on ebay vfor a vintage nos movement, how often are the screws marred. Screws do not get marred from storage but from loosing or tightening by a wrong screwdiver.

What I find amusing on eBay is not so much the screws but people selling balance wheels with interesting hairspring conditions. For instance a quick look for 1570 gives us this balance wheel At the bargain price of $250 because something with a better hairspring cost a couple hundred more as you can see it has interesting hairspring problems and almost looks like perhaps a little discoloration like maybe a little rust?

s-l1600.jpg.417595f6a921e78087b47a53478b0463.jpg

2 hours ago, Ronp said:

Back to the subject: Adjusting the balance spring is an art that takes much practice to hone your skills to the required level for a high quality brequet balance like a rolex 1570.

Actually the first step to doing anything with the hairspring is to figure out what is actually wrong with it.  As the original pictures were very misleading. It's one of the problems I have with people using microscopes and looking straight down and not looking in like they should be because for the most part the hairspring is probably just fine but we don't get a report back the original posting person. We only get that straight down picture of oh dear it looks bad.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Ronp said:

250 dollars would be steal for a factory new balance in a not openend before blister. So much so called new old stock with some sign of storage is in reality an old, used part in a questionable condition. F.e. take a look on ebay vfor a vintage nos movement, how often are the screws marred. Screws do not get marred from storage but from loosing or tightening by a wrong screwdiver.

 

It is a good price but like I said, not unheard of if you pay attention to eBay and forums. I got a blistered 1570 for 250EUR last year - so a hair over 250USD but not far off. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I love my brass tweezers and use them for 90% of my work. I like that brass is soft and does not scratch parts and it seems to grip parts better than stainless steel. And brass is also non-magnetic, which really helps when working on quartz movements. However, brass is a little too weak for jobs like pulling back yoke springs. So I thought of upgrading to bronze. But I can't seem to find curved bronze tweezers. And Cousins price for a pair of Bergeon straight bronze tweezers is around £45. A couple of months back I had the idea of swapping out the carbon fibre tips of my tweezers and putting in bronze tips. And that is what I did. I got a piece of 2.0mm bronze sheet from AliExpress and cut out 2 curved tips and replaced the carbon fibre tips. I'll probably thin down the tip further gradually to a point where it still has strength to draw back thick yoke springs. 
    • Ah, well that's a relief, though the parts document does list a 1520 which is a coupling clutch. This threw me for a while (it's a quiet day in the office) until I realised I couldn't see a listing for the reverser wheels. So, we're back to the mainspring should slip in the barrel. It can really only be one of three things (that I'm aware of) mainspring 'coned' and pressing slightly on the lid the kink, close to the  end of the spring, which puts a sort of a self lock grip on the spring and may not allow the spring to release enough there to allow slipping quantity of lubrication, either not enough, or too little Two of those require new mainsprings, which aren't readily available, though I may post a query about alternative mainspring sizes. The third, will more grease or less be required? The word breaking in breaking grease suggests more means more breaking?
    • The idler gear I'm referring too is the one between the 2 barrel wheels. These movements just rely on the spring slipping to prevent over winding.
    • Not sure how useful this might be, but a while back I bought some bamboo tweezers (multipack with a ridiculous amount of them in) and have been using them in place of pegwood. Seems to be working just fine
    • Ah, well there is the rub. I ordered a post and oscillating weight, but clicked on the wrong thing when adding the weight to the basket adding an automatic bridge. Ordered a weight, and it's somewhere in the ether after our customs and excise folks rejected it because of the documentation.  Yes, both springs inserted the same. "Is the idler gear ok", and here's why I posted to the newbie area: So, reading between the lines, and again correct me if I'm wrong here, the automatic winding mechanism will have an ideler gear, along with the reverse wheels, that prevents over-winding? There is nothing (that I'm aware of) between the crown pinion, crown wheel, and the ratchet wheels to prevent over-winding other than the mainsprings slipping in the barrels.  This is only the second automatic I've worked on. The other, a Vostok, had a very obvious mechanism.  I shall look at the automatic winding mechanism in a bit more detail when I've a bit more time. At the moment I'm taking a glance here now and then when work is dragging 😉 As ever, thank you for your help. Always appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...