Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Friends, I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms? Thanks.

Edited by Cihan
Posted
41 minutes ago, Cihan said:

I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms?

What was the watches doing before you service them and it be nice to have numbers beyond timing in one position. Like dial up or down and then crown down for amplitude and if you to picture a timing machine that would be nice?

Seiko typically does not publish their amplitude they did publish it in one of their documents and it's really low. But typically they should do better than what you're seeing there.

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

Posted (edited)

I would agree, Seiko amplitudes do seem a little low compared to their Swiss counterparts. 220° is my baseline when just finished rebuild (not based on any science, just seems to be a reasonable number for them) and as @wudce mentions they do better after everything has had a chance to settle in.

Edited by Waggy
Typo
Posted
34 minutes ago, wudce said:

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

The 180° is with the watch in a vertical position, this is from the 4006 service sheet. 

image.png.f56c8b0fde49ac6a787a6c2c7d1e1cb6.png

So horizontal, that's probably 210-220° ?

You may think it too low, but they, the designers of the movement don't 🤣

I agree with @wudce and @Waggy  about 220 - 240° is fine for these movements. I've spent a long time trying everything to get some movements higher, but they just don't want to.
I have a couple of higher grade movements (23J Lord Matic Cal 5606) which do get 270-280°, but not the bog-standard movements.

  • Like 1
Posted

I should have said 180 in the vertical position. It's hard to get much better on these older Seiko. Was not long since I did two Seiko 5 with the 6309 movement which both got new mainsprings and both ran in the low 200 in the vertical position. For a 47 year old watch this is not bad.👌

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello Tom and welcome to the forum.
    • Hah! Well, California will have to do. Lived in TX for a brief period back in the early 70s, though, so maybe that counts. 🙂 Funny you should mention making vacuum tubes- I've actually tinkered with that! It's REALLY tough to do, and I've never made one more complicated than a simple diode that barely worked, but I have played around at it. But there's just no infrastructure for vacuum tube fabrication. I can get a lathe and learn how to use it to make complex parts, and while it might take a while to learn- and money to get the equipment, of course- it is possible to do more or less "off the shelf". But vacuum tubes, not so much. There are a few folks out there doing some crazy cool work with bespoke tubes, but they have setups that are far beyond what I can manage in my environment and it's mostly stuff they built by hand. I also have been playing with making piezoelectric Rochelle Salt crystals to replace ancient vacuum tube turntable needles- nobody's made those commercially for probably 60 years. I'm a sucker for learning how to do weird things no one does any more so I can make things no one uses work again. (I think this is drifting off the topic of lathes, lol).
    • You shoulda been born in Texas. Tough to make a vacuum tube though. You can substitute with a MOSFET eq ckt I guess. I was playing around making a pinion the other day. More to it than meets the eye.
    • Well, turns out it was a fake bezel! The crystal is domed mineral glass and I was able to find a cheap replacement that should be here in two days.  I used my crappy little press to pop out the cracked crystal, Ill give the case a good cleaning in the meantime and do a once over on the movement.     
    • Early ‘90s Debenhams in Oxford Street at InTime Watch Repairs. The older guy was one of my mentors Mr John Campfield, fantastic ex-Omega watchmaker. Good times - black hair gone now! 😄
×
×
  • Create New...