Jump to content

Hands vice/clamp


Recommended Posts

Good morning,

I am working on a 6s waltham PW.   I need to enlarge the hole on one of the hands, so i'd like to buy a hands clamp/vice so i can use a broach to enlarge the hole.  Does anyone know what the smallest size hole is on this type of clamp.  I've found quite a few on ebay.  I don't know if these are standard, to fit the whole range of  hand sizes or if i need one specifically for smaller PWs.  I asked the seller but didn't get a response.  Thanks for any advice.

hand clamp.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, arron said:

Thanks guys.  The new repro models show the smallest size hole as either a .6 or a .8.  I'm going to get a vintage one, so hoping the sizes are standard or similar, but i'll find out soon.     

As Mike tells it, the hole size is only to accomodate the holding of the hand not the intended finishing diameter of the hole you are broaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that important clarification.   I went with the round version like they sell at cousins but it is a vintage clamp. I decided against the plier style but not based on any good information I could find about the differences. I made the mistake of trying to broach the hand using my bench block and some rodico  to hold the hand down.  The pointer instantly broke from the ring part of the hand. Lesson learned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, arron said:

Thanks for that important clarification.   I went with the round version like they sell at cousins but it is a vintage clamp. I decided against the plier style but not based on any good information I could find about the differences. I made the mistake of trying to broach the hand using my bench block and some rodico  to hold the hand down.  The pointer instantly broke from the ring part of the hand. Lesson learned.

There at least two sizes of this vintage tool.  I have both.  Have you already purchased one?  If not, I can do some measurements for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. Yes I purchased it last night. Hopefully it has some of the smaller size holes that I think will be better support the hands that I work on.  If not I might hit you up on your offer to take measurements of the other one that you have.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
×
×
  • Create New...