Jump to content

I'm Not Big On Smart Watches, But This Thing Is Sexy!


Recommended Posts

I don't actually own a watch that is anything other than mechanical. And, I just can't make myself buy a quartz timepiece. But that's just me! I do own a smart phone and embrace technology as much as the next guy but have never thought of buying a "Smart" watch. Most all the smart watches that have been developed  have been mini versions of smart phones strapped to your wrist...boring!

 

That may change! This watch is Beautiful!  

post-90-0-49788100-1395321871_thumb.jpg

 

 

Here is a quick video....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnerqDWwVgg

 

What do you think? Will you wear one?

 

No word yet on the price, but I guess it will be HIGH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has to be the worlds leading techno gizmo and for the busy, busy, techno man is a must have.  I can find no mention of price, but for a guess it ain't going to be cheap.  I like early American pocket watches but I could also find room for a Moto 360.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no use for this but love it. My phone is still steam powered and if i did not need it for work I would not even have a cell phone!

 

I saw a friends smart watch, I think its called pebble or something, I did like that you could change how the screen looked, he had a Patek dial on it when I saw it  :startle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  I like early American pocket watches but I could also find room for a Moto 360.

 

 

I really appreciate the fact that "They" started their design premise with the goal of creating a beautiful watch that accepted the heritage of what watches once were!

 

I also read some comments about this watch on some of the Techie sites and the reviews are decidedly mixed!? But, these comment are from a demographic that is overwhelmingly Techno-geeks! None of them probably even wear a watch and thinks it's just an impractical accessory in today's technological world.

 

I'm not sure if Motorola's primary intention was to design a smart watch for people who normally wear time of day watches, but this really strikes a cord with me about how they embraced why this particular device should resemble a real timepiece.. Well done!

Edited by DJW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At first I thought what a cracking looking watch...........then on further investigation I discover that it is not a watch but some sort of fancy electronic gizmo that should be issued to officers on the Star Ship Enterprise.

Definitely a clever thing; I'm not a Luddite and do like to see technology advancing, but I would not wear this on my wrist..........at any price. As an old time mechanical engineer and amateur horologist, I'll stick to these wonderful miniature mechanical engines for wearing on my wrist. Why........because it makes me feel good and I'm still blown away by the accuracy that they can achieve.

Having said all that, if it floats your boat get one, at the end of the day it only matters what you think!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely love gadgets, but I am not sure about this. I just don't think so.

 

I will be interested to see how the whole concept of smart watch will progress. I would imagine Apple will get in on the act soon. http://www.knowyourmobile.com/apple/apple-iwatch/19775/apple-iwatch-release-date-specs-features-design-watch-space

 

Nothing will beat having a mechanical watch on your wrist IMO.

 

Edit: Actually I can see that a good application for these watches will be with fitness app's I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one solar quartz watch, one quartz chronograph and one automatic watch - all the rest are mechanical hand-wound. And any others I buy will be mechanical and hand-wound.

 

There are some wonderfully clever devices around the place - I'm typing this on a very cute mac Book Pro, for example, and not a typewriter - but the movements in mechanical watches are fascinating and beautiful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thats what i have scott. Read back a little i posted a few pictures. Basically i put a small quantity of around quarter inch in the bottom of a tin and heated it on a leccy oil burner. It doesn't need much heat, stuck the jewels to the lid with bluetack and the fumes coat the surface pretty quickly although the first i did i left for 5 hours but it does only take 5 mins if that. The coating does seem to come off easily so i am not sure if it actually works, but the stuff is really cheap and worth an experiment or two. I have seen that mix somewhere but vapour coat is supposed to be better.
    • Would be interesting to see how well steric acid compares (or not) to the various epilames out there - anyone know the mixing ratios and solvent(s) etc for the steric acid?
    • I assume you're using 9415? the concerned with 9415 and I'm attaching a PDF from Omega is too much can cause a decrease in amplitude. This is why you look at what they do they go to extreme lengths to put extremely tiny quantities. so as you've discovered proper lubrication of the escapement increases the amplitude. We've seen it on this group where people are having typically newbies issues and I will ask if they lubricated the escapement the usual answer is no they had not because and once they did they saw spectacular improvement. one of the amusements with lubrication tends to be so many variations. For instance I was in a classroom once and the students all came from for the most part accredited schools in watch repair. So the instructor asked how did we lubricate our escapement's and I don't remember the actual quantity but it's really quite amazing how many people can interpret slightly different ways of doing the same ask. Of course the instructors method was the approved one. This was the place a drop of oil on the impulse face of the exit stone. Allow one third of the teeth to go by and place another drop then another third and your escapement should be lubricated. But sometimes and yes it will show up in the timing machine you'll see in your regular line because if the oil didn't transfer all the way around to the other stone that does cause a issue with the timing machine. Oh but when I was in school we were using 9010 as 9415 did not exist yet although 941 did which is an oil recommended for escapement's. it has to be dissolved in a proper solvent with the right amount of concentration as you want a microscopic layer on whatever your treating. My understanding is the vapor process is the very best but the vapors are not good for human consumption. The reason why the vapor process is nice is that it puts a very very thin coating on versus dipping in a solvent which can vary depending upon the concentration.   8645_WI_40_rules for lubrication cousins.pdf
    • A modern restorer would probably try to inject adhesive as suggested and then weight the repair down. Some damp might have caused the bulge originally.  Traditionally the veneer would have been sliced and glue eased under the two flaps then again weighted back down and refinished once it had cured.  It doesn't look like just an adhesive issue, more than likely expansion of the veneer, worse case it needs a slice taking out. Try some gentle heat on it first , inject glue and weight, to see where it goes.
    • I have seen several mentions of steric acid, how do you use this, I have only seen it in crystal/powder form?
×
×
  • Create New...