Jump to content

Timegrapher setup for PC running Linux (EndeveourOS/Arch)


Recommended Posts

On 3/16/2023 at 10:20 PM, JohnR725 said:

I wonder if you can change the averaging time of the software? If you look at timing specifications for watches they usually specify 20 seconds averaging time-based are you having a witschi timing machine. So maybe the software's averaging over a much shorter time span and mechanical watches unfortunately very so you're going to see that variation.

John was on the right track!

With PCTM there comes a file named ReadMe. If you do what it asks you, you will find detailed advice how to calibrate with inhibition-disturbed quartz watches.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Okay as I have the older version where I get the new version for the PC?

It was in the first paragraph of my long post just a few posts earlier in this thread, "I suggest getting my version of tg from github, https://github.com/xyzzy42/tg " and so on.  As I said then, I do not have a system for making Windows installer packages, so Windows users will have to build it themselves unless someone else can do it.

21 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Normally the zoom of 2 looks like what I would think it should look on well in a timing machine. Then I went to 8 and then 16 and trace still looks pretty good.

This is interesting, but what is zoom "8"?  8 what?  Perhaps zoom 1 means the width of the strip is one beat?  In that case, the default tg zoom is 10.  My version can smoothly zoom, not just in jumps.  I haven't seen anyone else able to do that.  Maybe it is not a good idea if no one else does it?  At least, I like it.

21 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I did run a time plot I'm not sure if we can really see every  15 seconds but you'll see there's the minor issues. But in real life stuff like this will average out over time. They just look interesting on the time plot. Then the numbers are all really close or not seeing dramatic differences.

The last graph?  Yes, it looks like a cycle of 45 seconds.

I noticed this single glitch in the Witschi plot,

image.png.c47c8b408d9ad9dd272e196b4a91e82a.png

So I wonder if there is something there?  Perhaps the similar glitches in tg are caused by this too?  I wish I could go back and look in detail at the sound and see why it thought this was the correct location.

Can you post a recording of the sound, like 90 seconds long, I could determine the levels and see what is causing the individual glitches.

I suspect what you see is the result of a few things:

  • The gain might be too high, resulting in clipping during the loudest part of the lock.
  • Timing based on the lock rather than unlock adds extra "jitter" to the paperstrip.  This does not effect s/d and amplitude measurements, but the paperstrip has more noise.  You do need to zoom in to even see this noise, but then we get to the next cause.
  • Tg is by default more zoomed in than a Weishi 1000.  It is probably like zoom 10 on software that does zoom "x" factors.
Edited by xyzzy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

FYI, I tried to compile Windows via the instructions on the github...needed to also install the gcc compiler before ./configure completes. However, make yields errors (something about integer). It does output an .exe, but can't run it in the output directory (missing .dlls). I tried copying all files in the output dir to the 0.0.5 windows install dir (which contains all the missing .dlls), but it gets an error and won't start. Haven't tried to progress further after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the hole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
    • The description there is exactly how it's done, and it's very well written!
×
×
  • Create New...