Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi.

I suppose it could just be the brass plating has been worn off, quite common or someone has been there before and used an inappropriate tool to scrape it clean, also quite common 😉 judging by the pattern left I would go with the latter.

Looks like it's from a manual wind so should be ok after a good clean and lubrication.

Obviously await some replies from the more knowledgeable as I am new so sometimes miss the obvious.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Do you have the old spring? What does the barrel cap look like on the inside. 

Yes - I’ll post a pic of that shortly too. 
 

Posted

Very interesting.  If I were to attempt to create this pattern in a mainspring barrel, I am not sure how I would do it.  Notice that the circles are concentric--do not follow a helical pattern (as I might expect if there were some particle that was working its way radially as the spring wound or unwound).

If you chucked it into a lathe and took a coarse wire brush and applied it once and stopped, maybe you could get that seemingly accurate concentric pattern.

A real mystery.

Posted

I think someone didn't remove the spring from the barrel and soaked it in an ammoiniated cleaner. And didn't dry it completely. 

Or it could be an unexplained phenomenon like the Turin Shroud. 

Posted
3 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

think someone didn't remove the spring from the barrel and soaked it in an ammoiniated cleaner. And didn't dry it completely.

But would not the pattern follow the form of the spring...a spiral?

Posted
14 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Do you have the old spring? What does the barrel cap look like on the inside. 

Here are pics of the old spring. Nothing I note to be abnormal. EDBA872D-CADB-4E7C-A3F5-2220DE3E29A0.thumb.jpeg.a5185d4c980de83eb404663dcde52ba0.jpeg47618620-0191-4A97-96CF-60EE3EABA82A.thumb.jpeg.b7af76682374f0c352422f459dc95448.jpegB7C1D86A-2820-4748-899E-5DD1E4E22A81.thumb.jpeg.fc7a2fbf6119267259248e3f84f3dc60.jpeg

Posted

That spring is marked on its edges so it has been rubbing in side the barrel as we can all see. I'm thinking the spring might not be the correct height for the movement hence the marks it has created in the barrel. I would certainly replace it. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...