Jump to content

Help identifying jewel type in Elgin 18s movement


Recommended Posts

Can someone help me understand which type of jewel setting I'm looking at in this Elgin 18s grade 146 mainplate? Reading the list of setting types over at Pocket Watch DB, I am unsure whether this is a burnished setting or a friction setting. I have a broken pallet pivot jewel I might take a stab at replacing, but I own no jeweling or burnishing tools and what I need to buy will depend on what setting I'm facing. (It's also possible this task is outside my skill level and I should set it aside for now. The watch runs well as long as I don't move it around too much). Unfortunately my broken jewel is on the mainplate, while the fullplate cover/bridge uses easy to remove screw settings instead.

 

If these are friction fit settings, is it possible to source replacements other than from a donor movement? Fabricating a setting on a lathe is out of the question for me right now. I think Otto Frei may stock a plain jewel without setting that could be burnished in. And which direction would they push out - outward through the dial side or inward?

This is the train side, I think the jewel is set in a setting that has been pressed into the plate.

979047226_Screenshotfrom2022-11-1110-06-17.png.823d8144bd8697898e00b16526fd229d.png

And from the dial side (not taken with magnification) the ring around the jewel slopes inward:

733982791_Screenshotfrom2022-11-1110-08-43.png.c96fa415db45d21e9dbedbc384ae7c31.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to be suffering reading skill issues because which tool is this now? I'm guessing perhaps it's the pallet fork the lower pallet fork jewel..

iin any case whatever it is you can look at the link below and see what the part number is not based on the part number we can look up and see if it's a jewel in a setting or what it is.

tthen the problem with an 18 size watch is it's an older watch so the older watches things were done a little differently than a newer watches. As you've noticed the watches visible plate has nice jewels in settings that screw in on the other side they are burnished in and I'm guessing it's burnished into the main plate I don't think it pushes out but once we figure out what it is we look on the parts list and see of in figure that out.

17 hours ago, mbwatch said:

I think Otto Frei may stock a plain jewel without setting that could be burnished in.

ideally when you're burnishing in a jewel it should be a jewel specifically designed for them. Otherwise you can have a tough time getting the metal to actually burnish over the square shoulder of a modern jewel.

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/Script_Find_Grade.php

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I seem to be suffering reading skill issues because which tool is this now? I'm guessing perhaps it's the pallet fork the lower pallet fork jewel..

That's right, this is a lower pallet fork jewel - if I have my vocabulary right and "lower" jewels are set on the mainplate/bottom plate. That makes it part #2247, thanks for pointing me to the parts database.

 

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Otherwise you can have a tough time getting the metal to actually burnish over the square shoulder of a modern jewel

Indeed - I just watched a demonstration of this scenario, where the modern jewel's shoulder had to be ground to a bevel in order to burnish over. That would be well outside my available tooling and skill set at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mbwatch said:

That would be well outside my available tooling and skill set at this point.

grinding the edge on the jewel is surprisingly easy to do but it would be nice if you to watchmakers lathe. Somewhere in the group I think I posted a drawing in images this you basically need a piece of metal with a pivot on the end you put the jewel on your pivot with a little but oil and you need a diamond lap which a lot of watchmakers will have for sharpening their gravers. In year laying spinach you bring the jewel up so it spins with the lap it sounds weirder than it really is and if you angle it just right you can just get the jewel the spin and knocked the corner off and it works really well it's action quite simple. But without knocking the edge off your screwed well I've seen people still try to do it and it's problematic.

Another way to do this is if you had your jewel tools which you probably don't you just ream out the whole input in a modern jewel. Because nobody's going to see it on that side of the watch. You can try to find another 18 size plates with the correct jewel and hope that it actually fits because there's usually parts variations back then. But the usual reason that that jewel is broken is people don't know what they're doing with the putting in 18 size watch full plate back together again.

When you're putting in 18 size watch back together the pallet fork has to be attached to the upper plate and held in place with a variety of methods and then the plates with the pallet fork comes down on the main plate with all the wheels there and then you getting the pallet fork in the problem is sometimes a be on top of the escape wheel and they end up putting pressure where you shouldn't and you break the jewel or Enoch the pallet jewels out of alignment you can basically end up with a lot of damage by not understanding how to put in 18 size watch back together again. Which is why the jewel is broken

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

You can try to find another 18 size plates with the correct jewel and hope that it actually fits because there's usually parts variations back then

I have my eye one one at auction this week, same grade possibly same production run. I will probably try to buy it but I am hoping not to kill a donor movement; I would rather make a less than ideal fix to this one or just leave it aside until my skills advance. I don't have a Horia tool but expect I'll need to get one sooner rather than later along with some jewel gauges. I am nowhere near ready for a lathe yet.

 

31 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Another way to do this is if you had your jewel tools which you probably don't you just ream out the whole input in a modern jewel.

So the idea here is to cut away the extra metal intended for burnishing to a determined diameter and just push in a modern friction jewel. This is the sort of less-than-ideal fix I had in mind, which feels attainable at my skill level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mbwatch said:

Horia tool

a lot of people use a Seitz tool especially if you're going to put in a modern jewel you would have to open up the hole and the tool usually comes with the reamers. Or simplistically if you doing all of this right you need both of them.

40 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

dictation software

sometimes I hate dictation software just the little line up above three separate things had to be changed otherwise it wouldn't have made any sense at all. On the other hand without it I wouldn't even be here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome Gary, enjoy the forum.
    • There is a known fault with the 3135 which is if the watch has not been serviced the Auto rotor can wear. See attached pic.    
    • How do I check that?
    • I sort of am expecting that ring to push against the rim of the crystal and possibly a seal against the front of the case. Hence everything comes out the back. Nothing else seems to make sense to me. I am trying to imagine why the crystal would not push out unless the ring needs to be backed off to allow the crystal to be pushed out, but then how does the ring come out? I am new to stripping watches though and am happy to stand corrected. 🙂 
    • Hi @Roll1ex, welcome to the forum. It's considered good practice to introduce yourself to the forum in this thread: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/forum/23-introduce-yourself-here/ But no worries. I don't have the spec sheet for the 15xx movements, but when I look at the 31xx information, it stands out that the endshake of the rotor should be between 0.01 and 0.03mm. That is LESS than the pallet fork and the lowest of all endshakes in the movement. Not exactly sure what you mean by that. The rotor itself is a unique part which doesn't have different heights. If you mean the height at which it is installed vis-a-vis the automatic bridge, then yes, that can be adjusted a bit via the two jewels that hold the rotor axle. Height differences vis-a-vis the bridge can also be caused by the strength with which the new axle is hammered/riveted into the rotor. And yes, that can be compensated a bit via the jewels.   This would probably indicate that the axle isn't perfectly perpendicular to the rotor. That could explain why the weight is closer to the rest of the movement at 9 o'clock -- it would then be furthest at 3 o'clock. That would be bad news. A new axle should then be installed... and properly this time.   As I wrote already, there is margin for adjustment via the jewels. As for the spring clip, the 15xx movements only seems to have one spring clip thickness (part 7911 - https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/2878_Rolex 1530 Pages 6-10.pdf). The later 31xx movments have several versions with different thicknesses. But there is a good chance that the clip is worn (=thinner than it should) and should then be replaced.   But, in conclusion, if the rotor hits the caseback in one particular postion, then my first suspicion is that the axle wasn't punched in at a perfect 90° angle. That must first be re-done correctly. No other fixes will be solving that problem. Furthermore, if the rotor "dings" against the caseback when the watch is shaken (but not in other situations), then there is likely also an issue of endshake (more an issue of the jewels) or lateral play (more likely the sping clip).      PS: by whom? Independent or RSC? 
×
×
  • Create New...