Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

In the second close-up, the hairspring appears to me not to pass between the rugulator's pin and boot.

It looks OK if you zoom in 

image.png.b629f6d0498db02620baf75f1c109d35.png

Posted
41 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

Yep, that's fine. Not centred, but that's not causing the OP's problem. For some reason I couldn't zoom in with anything like that resolution.

Using Google Chrome, right click on the image, then "Open Link in new window".  You can then zoom in to the original pic size

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

@AmmarHello. Yes I did. This is the second time now and I've done it a bit differently this time. 

Personally I think that the power distribution/travel is poor on this movement, and that the balance wheel perhaps should be a bit heavier (to react less to changes). 

This time I cleaned the leaving daylight out of the main spring and the whole power train. Before installing the spring I used Molykote DX paste and applied super thin coat on it (first time I just added some oil on top of the assembled spring inside the barrel in several spots).  To maybe smoot-out/dampen the movement of the spring? 

Judging by the timegrapher, movement runs smoother, but still I notice some acceleration/deceleration with the balance wheel. With lowest 308 and highest 347 amplitude, witch results in -7...+5 s/d.  But those jumps are pretty rare, most of the time it runs around 320-322 and -1...0s/d. 

Maybe if I could record for a longer period of time the changes and fine the time between the pics, that might shine some light where the defect might be. Maybe there is some wear on one side of the pivot? 

Honestly not sure if its worth it, as I spent already quite a lot time fiddling with this watch.

What do you guys think? 

 

014EC295-D157-4E38-8573-1302623C8AAC.jpeg

 

3DE9F819-7C60-4D7E-A2A0-0C8DBA761405.jpeg

FD8AF221-732E-4059-9446-BCB9C75A5412.jpeg

Edited by swiss2k
  • Like 2
Posted
47 minutes ago, swiss2k said:

@AmmarHello. Yes I did. This is the second time now and I've done it a bit differently this time. 

Personally I think that the power distribution/travel is poor on this movement, and that the balance wheel perhaps should be a bit heavier (to react less to changes). 

This time I cleaned the leaving daylight out of the main spring and the whole power train. Before installing the spring I used Molykote DX paste and applied super thin coat on it (first time I just added some oil on top of the assembled spring inside the barrel in several spots).  To maybe smoot-out/dampen the movement of the spring? 

Judging by the timegrapher, movement runs smoother, but still I notice some acceleration/deceleration with the balance wheel. With lowest 308 and highest 347 amplitude, witch results in -7...+5 s/d.  But those jumps are pretty rare, most of the time it runs around 320-322 and -1...0s/d. 

Maybe if I could record for a longer period of time the changes and fine the time between the pics, that might shine some light where the defect might be. Maybe there is some wear on one side of the pivot? 

Honestly not sure if its worth it, as I spent already quite a lot time fiddling with this watch.

What do you guys think? 

What do I think? I wonder what you are trying to achieve?

You have achieved chronometer standard from a fairly standard watch movement. I've had few watches which run that well. 

Well done.

Posted (edited)

Hello @mikepilk. Thank you for the kind words.

Maybe I was not clean in my text. What I want is it to stop jumping from 308 to 347 degrees back and forth.  😃 

An interesting observation. When I set the movement dial side up in the timegrapher, amplitude is higher, beat error is lower and overall seems to run much better. 

Magic!

E564EDC4-8AC1-4C4E-A266-01529DC33B27.jpeg

Edited by swiss2k
  • 2 years later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome to the WRT forum.
    • interesting video nice to see the machine what it can do now I wonder what it costs and I'm sure it's not in my budget. Plus the video brought up questions but the website below answers the questions? What was bothering me was the size of his machine 4 mm because I thought it was bigger than that? But then it occurred to me that maybe they had variations it looks like four, seven and 10. With the seven and 10 being the best because way more tool positions in way more rotating tools. Although I bet you all the rotating tools are probably separate cost https://www.tornos.com/en/content/swissnano   Then as we been talking about Sherline. Just so that everyone's aware of this they have another division their industrial division where you can buy bits and pieces. I have a link below that shows that just in case you don't want to have the entire machine you just need bits and pieces. https://www.sherline.com/product-category/industrial-products-division/   Let's see what we can do with the concept I explained up above and bits and pieces. For one thing you can make a really tiny gear very tiny like perhaps you're going to make a watch. Then another version the center part is not separate it is all machined from one piece. Then fills gear cutting machines have gone through multiple of evolutions. A lot of it based on what he wanted to make like he was going to make a watch unfortunately eyesight issues have prevented that. Another reason why you should start projects like this much sooner when your eyesight is really good or perhaps start on watches first and then move the clocks then local we have from the industrial division? Looks like two separate motors and heads. Then it's hard to see but this entire thing is built on top of a much larger milling machine as a larger milling machine gave a very solid platform to build everything.   Then like everything else that had multiple generations are versions the indexing went through of course variations like above is one version and the one below was the last version. Now the version below I mentioned that previously and somewhere in the beginning to discussion and somebody else had one in their picture. As it is a really nice precision indexing. Then I wasn't sure if I had a the watch photos here is his unfinished watch. No he wasn't going to make a simple watch like none of his clocks were simply either what would be the challenge and that.    
    • Use a Portwest Howie lab coat. They are the biological type so they have tapped cuffs so you don't end up getting the loose cuffs of normal lab coats catching everything. 
    • Some of the Chinese tools ae great and can be purchased at a fraction of the price of Swiss ones, some are complete garbage and some I'm convinced are coming out the same factory as the branded ones.
    • I found this string about this problem. I've not gone through it all, but I believe it also mentions making a spring. If not in this string, the info is online.
×
×
  • Create New...