Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

One of the reasons I decided to learn watch repair was to be able to maintain my own watch that has an ETA 2824-2 skeleton movement in it. As it happens I also managed to give the watch a bit of a shock - my own stupid fault - and since then it's been running oddly. I first noticed it wasn't keeping time, then with a bit of investigation I found that it ran ok when face up, but came close to stopping face down. I've now taken the movement out, I took the balance out and had a look, it seems ok but i'm new to this!

Now that it's out, the most up-to-date version of the issue is that when either of the shock springs is released the watch goes. As soon as both shock springs are secured the watch stops - like they're too tight or something? I'm happy to provide pictures if that'd help. My usb microscope isn't great, but the end stones look ok to me. The pivot on the lower side of the balance staff looks good. I can't see the other one as the hair spring is in the way, I can remove it to look but this is new territory for me so wanted to ask first! Any advice would be much appreciated.

Posted

 If you removed both end stones , then you should  see the pivot on the dial side too.

 A broken or bent pivot is the most likely senario which usually is visible under high magnification and  rarely loss of end shake due to the shock, hairspring coil rubbing might also cause this.

Does it run strong in all positions when you loosen the cock screw or remove the end stones?  or does it loose  amplitude faced down ?

I don't suppose you yet have a timegrapher to give us some amplitudes, you might instead ink mark a dot on balance wheel and try slo- mo to get an idea of amplitudes. 

Its an etachron so I wouldn't recommend pulling the balance complete for closer inspection, but you can inspect/show a close up of the pivot without detaching cock-balance complete. 

A close up side view vid of the oscilator running be nice to have.

Good luck pal.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

It's rare for a pivot to get damaged with shock protected jewels (though it does happen). More likely on this caliber is the hairspring got shifted and/or possibly bent; it can happen in a way that would give your symptoms, and seem to be relieved with the added balance freedom of loosening the jewel spring. Some pics would help. If you have a phone made in the last 5 years it will probably suffice for this, no need for ultra close-ups at this point.

  • Like 3
Posted

Thanks very much both for the advice so far. The good news is I'm in no rush - haven't been wearing this watch as it doesn't keep time, so keen to take my time and not make it worse.

I attempted to take some pictures this morning, not the best but maybe it's start. The side on of the watch while running (shock spring released) didn't come out great. Nucejoe I don't have a timegrapher yet, but am considering getting one as I do think it'd make things clearer. I tried to video and work out the amplitude but I need to revisit this, the video wasn't very clear. This said, if I correctly interpret amplitude as the angle a single point goes from left to right I'm not convinced it's very good.

The hairspring looks a bit peculiar on the right hand side, but could be reflection off the bridge? 

I really appreciate the help! Regardless of the issues it's been really rewarding so far to take this watch apart. It was not super expensive, but I'm quite attached to it.DSC04707.thumb.JPG.c9fc3bd232694ad290dc2e3120adf62a.JPG

DSC04704.JPG

DSC04706.JPG

DSC04708.JPG

DSC04710.JPG

DSC04711.JPG

DSC04713.JPG

Posted

Terminal curve is,   Ok.

Coil  is concentric,   OK           and seems flat,  Ok. 

The coil should be level  ( ie: not slanted when installed on mainplate)  so not to rub on balance spokes or the cock. Hairspring rubbing increasingly appears to be the problem as Nickelsilver first said, I would hold the movement up close to your eyes to see if it the H/S rubs as the balance oscilates. 

What amplitude would say you have in terms of degrees in face down position? 

Regds

 

 

 

Posted

I had a very close look, I can't see obvious contact between the hairspring and the balance or cock but it's very small! I can't rule it out.

I did manage to get a photo of the other pivot though, and it seems to be there and not obviously bent. I also took some slow mo shots with my phone camera to try and guage amplitude. I believe the idea is to visually track an arm all the way from end to end and calculate the degrees rotation? It looks good, but the watch only runs with the gems off so I did that. Face down the amplitude seems to be ~360 which seems too high, but is there much less friction with the stones off? On its side (stone still off) it was 300.

Of course now I can't find the end stone to put it back in 🤦‍♂️.

IMG_20220726_152900_BURST024.jpg

start.png

end.png

Posted

 Amplitude equals half of a full swing, 180 degrees is low.  Is 360 with the jewel in place or jewel removed as in above pictures? 

 Did you observe the hairspring for rubbing in face down position? since its when we expect the H/S to rub. 

 

 

 

Posted

I understand that at the beginning the watch ran but did it badly. After disassembling and reassembling the end stones it doesn‘t run at all anymore. Did you know that the endstones have a flat and a domed side? The flat side is inwards. If the domed side happens to point to the pivot the balance has not enough end play and binds.

  • Like 3
Posted

Based on OP the watch ran        1-  oddly  

                                                     2-   was not keeping time

                                                     3-  came close to stopping face down

Case 3 was observed before disassembly.

Regds

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, MikeP said:

…Of course now I can't find the end stone to put it back in 🤦‍♂️.

OMG! 🥴 (I‘ve been there)

This tiny particle can jump into your hair or even nostril and disappear forever.

Good luck finding it!

Edited by Kalanag
  • Haha 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

or even nostril and disappear forever

LOL, snorting cap jewels...another high.

In my short modern span of watchmaking (getting close to two years now), I have not lost a cap jewel.  They have gone flying on multiple occasions. However, I found that using a super bright large wide beam flashlight is extremely helpful in finding these things...even on carpet.

  • Like 1
Posted

If you happen to have a UV flashlight, they can help, too. The little buggers will glow when they are hit with UV. Helped me several times. 

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Kalanag said:

I understand that at the beginning the watch ran but did it badly. After disassembling and reassembling the end stones it doesn‘t run at all anymore. Did you know that the endstones have a flat and a domed side? The flat side is inwards. If the domed side happens to point to the pivot the balance has not enough end play and binds.

I didn't know this! To be honest I was just glad my eyes were good enough to see thing thing at all 🙂 Once I have both stones back in place, I'll try and make sure this is sorted so we can cross that off the list of potential issues.

4 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

This guy shows end shake.

https://youtu.be/gJwfOJ_TPt4

So when the lost end stones decides to find you, you have a chance to check the balance staff end shake. 

Regds

Thanks! I'll check this issue out as well. As below, I'm pretty sure the stones have gone to live with someone else because they're not here! I may be ressurecting this thread in a few days 🙂

3 hours ago, Kalanag said:

OMG! 🥴 (I‘ve been there)

This tiny particle can jump into your hair or even nostril and disappear forever.

Good luck finding it!

Lol "I'll fix my own watch, how hard could it be?" 😂 The stone may turn up in due course, but for the sake of my sanity crawling around on the floor I'm going to order a set too. I'll keep looking.

The ones I can't find are both one end stone, but also the holed jewel with the metal setting it is attached to. On cousins the part lists includes Inca 122.11 - Endstone which seems pretty self explanatory. Another option is Inca 111.09 - Jewel Hole, is this the holed jewel in a metal setting? These seem to come in packs of 5. There are also upper and lower blocks which presumably come with jewels but seems over the top to pay for all the metal surround and springs which I haven't managed to lose yet.

Thanks everyone for the support so far it's hugely appreciated.

Edited by MikeP
  • Like 2
Posted

Hi all, an update to how I'm getting on here. New jewels came in the post, so I've fitted a pair and they seems fine. Kalanag you were absolutely right that I had one of the stones in upside down, it no longer stops when I put the shock springs in. So that's at least one small thing solved.

I've dug out an old macro lens that I can use as a magnifier, and I've also bought a timegrapher. As was discussed above, I was able to get decent timing and amplitude face up, amplitude and timing dropped substantially face down. I've examined both pivots on the balance under magnification and I'm pretty sure they're both intact. However i've now lost any ability to regulate the watch on the timegrapher, maybe I damaged the spring? Or maybe I magnetised it. I took this photo below, it doesn't look as concentric as before, the coils on the left seem too close? On the time grapher it just looks like a snowstorm of dots all over the place.

I figured I'd try and solve this issue first before delving further into the face down problem.

 

DSC04718.thumb.JPG.f1d99ae185d54b08758df66cdec4751c.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted

The alternative I guess is to replace it? I suppose if I need to replace it anyway, I can have a go at fixing it first. If it doesn't work easily enough I'll seek a replacement.

Posted

1- You would want the coil centered.

2-Adjust the hairspring  to pass through the  mid-point of the gap in this " the etachron regulator stud", when the oscilator is at rest. You may need to turn the reg-stud a bit for such adjustment for isochronism which is best done with special tool. See DIY tools made by members, it basically a slot filed on a screwdriver blande to fit the stud head.

Good luck.

 

 

https://cdn.watchrepairtalk.com/monthly_2020_07/20200712_093708.jpg.d48b96ede20ea50904daaf1b682afbee.jpg

It can be used to turn the reg-stud with as well as pushing it out of the reg- arm.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...