Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm currently looking at a French fob watch, and I've noticed what I can only describe as a 'cloudy' part of the crystal, as seen in the pic.

I've tried buffing this off with Windowlene, and then with (gasp!) acetone, but neither of these seems to have made an improvement.

This situation is new to me, I've not seen anything like this before. Am I in for a replacement crystal or how can I remove this, please? - I'm not really sure that this is something that is going to buff out as it doesn't exactly look like a a scratch and the area is not centred on the crystal?  ...

TIA

Ian

 

cloudy crystal.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It almost looks like it has been stained. It depends how deep this is. Some on here have had success in polishing out scratches. However I am not a patient person so unless imperfections are minor I just change the crystal. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Simichrome which does a good job, just make sure the imperfection is on the outside, I spent ages the other day trying to polish out a blemish like yours only to find it was on the inside of the crystal, no idea how it got there though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Abenaqui scouring paste (for kitchen cleaning) on a papertowel.  If it's a deep imperfection, a bit of very fine wet or dry paper speeds it all up.

Shane

Edited by Shane
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is a glass crystal, then the crystal is probably "etched". A sticker or or something else that was slightly acidic was sitting against it for a long time, perhaps?

The way to get rid of that on a glass crystal is to polish with cerium oxide, I've seen a suggestion of using a piece of dowel rod to hold the cerium oxide paste (at the end). Supposedly makes it easier to handle than using a cloth. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dadistic said:

The way to get rid of that on a glass crystal is to polish with cerium oxide, I've seen a suggestion of using a piece of dowel rod to hold the cerium oxide paste (at the end). Supposedly makes it easier to handle than using a cloth. 

Abenaqui scouring paste (I'm sure there is something similar in your location) uses feldspar which has a Mohs Hardness of 6 and works quite well on glass (if you are patient) and plastic crystals.  Glass has a Mohs Hardness number from 5.5 to 7, depending on the glass.  Cerium oxide was listed on the chart I found at 7, which will work faster but is more expensive and less available were I am.

I have used the piece of wood trick before but not on crystals (should still work).  The abrasive gets embedded into the wood and continues to cut rather than getting lost somewhere in the cloth.  Just make sure you average all of your polishing out across the crystal, otherwise you will see waviness through the glass.

Good luck.

Shane

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi There are propriatry  (polywatch)pastes for polishing watch crystals but I use Automotive chrome cleaner (Autosolvol) its mild enough and polishes ok takes a bit of elbo grease as does any polishing.

I also use autosol. It was mentioned in a de carle book. I Have tried other things as well, bicarbonate powder not as effective  and also eucryl toothpowder which does actually work ok. But the Autosol is by far the best and is very comparable to polywatch, in fact i couldnt tell the difference.  I start with 600 grade wet and dry depending on how deep the scratches then 200 grit increments up to 2000 and then finish with Autosol. A crystal generally takes about 20 mins to half an hour depending how bad the scratches.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...