Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is an adjusted Elgin 832. It runs 4min. Fast in 36hrs. Is it possible it is magnetized. I am getting a timegraph machine in two weeks or so. Can you help without that data?36477ce4f3631cf68cc8f5876bd1b803.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

It runs 4min. Fast in 36hrs. Is it possible it is magnetized. I am getting a timegraph machine in two weeks or so. Can you help without that data?36477ce4f3631cf68cc8f5876bd1b803.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It is possibly magnetised or contaminated. It's always a good idea to demagnetise as a meter of course when servicing a watch. If you have a demagnetiser, zap it and see how it goes.

When you get your timegrapher, post pictures of the results and someone will give you advice. Have a look at this in the meantime:- http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/page/index.html/_/watch-repair-information/timegrapher-fault-detection-r29

Posted

It's an adjusted watch. There is none. Which makes it an easy watch to work on but a harder watch to regulate if it is out of balance.

Btw Geo, it only gains time in regular wearing position, when the crown is down. I can't wait for my timegraph. It is making a trip across the pond right now.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

It is possibly magnetised or contaminated. It's always a good idea to demagnetise as a meter of course when servicing a watch. If you have a demagnetiser, zap it and see how it goes.

When you get your timegrapher, post pictures of the results and someone will give you advice. Have a look at this in the meantime:- http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/page/index.html/_/watch-repair-information/timegrapher-fault-detection-r29

Here you go Geo

a908bc6a544ddd3fd946eda7076c364e.jpg

a9fd20f85ea0fbfbcf28ff724936331c.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I know I have a good tick, but I just want to make sure I am doing it right. You move the jewel manually under the balance to regulate the rate right?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by diamondslayer
Posted

Hi diamondslayer

Magnetism will result in errors way greater...more like 4mins fast in an hour.

I would service the watch first before attempting anything else, maybe a new mainspring while you're in there.

Being adjusted means that he watch has been fine-tuned by the factory to get the best possible results. It does not mean no regulator! In fact most adjusted watches have good quality regulators which allow fine tuning.

Not sure what jewel you mean but if its the roller jewel you are talking about there's nothing to be achieved here.

Anil

Posted (edited)

Thanks Anil!

I cleaned the watch already. So do you think it is still the mainspring? Why is it still showing 170+ rate?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by diamondslayer
Posted

A note regarding the missing regulator it's not missing. Regulators cause timing problems free sprung balances don't have that problem so Elgin came up with a innovative solution to the regulator problem the Durabalance. The unfortunate problem with their solution is it tends to frustrated and confused the watchmaker who probably never seen one of these before. Fortunately it is in the service manual which can be found at the link below.

 

http://www.flynwill.com/Watches/ElginManual/ElginMan18.htm

 

Then a note regarding the timing machine it's not going to really show any meaningful numbers unless it's over 200° amplitude. When the watches been freshly serviced it should be much closer to 300° only falling into the 200 range at the end of 24 hours running. Trying to regulate the watch when the amplitude is way below 200° will definitely not be a good thing for you.

 

Here's a link to a PDF with a lot of useful information even though the timing machine is different the information is still valid.

 

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Witschi%20Training%20Course.pdf

 

When you cleaned the watch did you remove the mainspring from the barrel?

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, but I have to wind it by hand. I had some thin finger cots that kept getting broken in the spring while I put it back in the barrel. I have some finger cots that are thicker and I think they are going to do a better job.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Witschi Has some other things on timing you might find interesting. First one is kind of similar to the other link but different. The second PDF explains were all those numbers come from related to timing.

 

Test and measuring technology mechanical watches

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Test%20and%20measuring%20technology%20mechanical%20watches.pdf

 

Calculation of the values X-D-DVH-Di-Im-N

 

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Calculation%20of%20the%20values%20X-D-DVH-Di-Im-N.pdf

 

 

The problem with the watch are working on is it is really small. The problem with really small watches is everything becomes super critical.

  • Like 1
Posted

Most of the time for mainspring is I'm using 8200. Then 8201 is basically the same thing with some molybdenumdisulphide which does make for a nice lubrication except in this application. Then 8300 is just a little bit heavier which definitely wouldn't be good for this application.

 

http://hiro.alliancehorlogere.com/en/Under_the_Loupe/Moebius_8201

 

Notice on the above link the reference to using 8201 as a breaking grease for automatic watches? One of the the interesting properties of all greases and probably technically all lubrication's they also function as a braking function. In the case of the automatic watch the mainspring  has the potential of being continuously wound so it has to to slip at some point in time. So they use a grease that holds until it's released and lubrication's with molybdenumdisulphide work well for that application. But as all greases hold until the release also have the unfortunate characteristic of if they're too heavy not allowing the mainspring to slide in its normal fashion. Which probably sounds like a hopelessly confusing thing that I'm saying. So normally the grease works fine for a mainspring as there is lots of pressure and the braking effect isn't even noticed but on a really tiny watch these greases are just too heavy their way too sticky.

 

Next link overload of lubrication information. Notice the reference on 8200 that it semi liquid and 8300 solid. Plus just a whole lot of general information in here on Mobius lubrication.

 

http://www.m-p.co.uk/muk/acrobat/hse/moebius-hs-sheets/moebius-specsbook.pdf

 

So on page 15 of the above link is the lubrication chart. So notice for really tiny watches the mainspring is not a grease but a oil 8030. Then 8200 universal mainspring grease for just about everything and towards the end switching over to 8300.

 

So another document covering lubrication

 

http://www.bhi.co.uk/Documents/certificate/Tech/PractLub.pdf

 

Then I wouldn't run out by any 8030 for just one watch. One of the problems I have with all of the 8000 series lubrication's are that there are natural and I would really prefer synthetic.

 

So I don't know if I have a good recommendation for your mainspring so an absence of that at pick a heavy watch oil or light clock oil preferably synthetic.

Posted

Thanks John! I am going to sign up for ACWI institute and finish some of their courses. I can't wait to learn more.

Our watch maker passed away and his wife took all his tools. So it has been difficult trying to learn and carry on our business! I was his apprentice. I used to be in sales...lol

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...