Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am currently I'm the process of servicing a Tissot 784. The incabloc in the main plate for the balance was broken and subsequently led the previous owner to super glue the jewel in place. I thought I found a replacement balance jewel assembly with incabloc but when it arrived it seemed much too large. I measure it with calipers and the largest diameter is 2.15mm. I compared it with the one that I removed and that one only measured 1.9mm at it's largest diameter. I have attached a photo of the part I ordered. Any ideas on where I went wrong? Multiple ebay vendors have this part listed for multiple movements. 

PXL_20220712_200852194.MP.jpg

Posted

Hi  I have attached three sheets in order for you to cross reference the number, a quick look indicates the number on the packet is correct but obviously does not fit. The fact that the old one was broken was this due to wear of hamfisted fitting by the previous attempt at repair, the cock you have may also not be origional.  a pocture of the movement front and back may help. Also have a look at the Ranfft web site for a comparison and further information.      cheers

2789_Tissot 781,782,783,784 (7).pdf 2790_Tissot 781.1,782.1,783.1,784.1 (10).pdf 2791_Tissot 783.2,784.2 (7).pdf

Posted

That’s the lower setting. The upper would be on the balance cock. I’ll go look for some pics of a recent service I did on one of these in the morning. Maybe it’ll help giving a little more detail

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, gbyleveldt said:

That’s the lower setting. The upper would be on the balance cock. I’ll go look for some pics of a recent service I did on one of these in the morning. Maybe it’ll help giving a little more detail

Do you know where I can buy this setting? I just need to replace either the shock spring or the entire setting with shock spring. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Kappa505 said:

Do you know where I can buy this setting? I just need to replace either the shock spring or the entire setting with shock spring. 

Not sure where you’d get the shock setting loose to be honest. I was lucky and got an escape wheel for that watch at Cousins, but because it’s a Swiss watch parts are generally a pain. Grsnovi’s suggestion might be a good one.

Is the whole setting damaged or is the spring just missing?

Posted

My experience is the Incabloc on these Tissot seem to be a bit weaker that on others as I have personally encoutered around 4 or 5 of the Inca springs. I dont have any issues with Inca on other brands.

You can actually buy the springs itself instead of the whole setting.

Anilv

Posted

If the previous repair glued the setting in place can you be sure there isn't glue in the slot(s) where the Incabloc seats?

Posted
10 hours ago, grsnovi said:

You might try these guys:

https://www.ofrei.com/page615.html

Since you know the make/model and jewel setting diameter, they seem to have quite a selection. They've been pretty good answering my questions but I've never gone to them looking for such a specific part.

Looks like shock spring 270.03 is a listed application for the tissot 784. Thanks for the tip! As far as the glue in the incabloc seat i will just have to be thorough in my cleaning and verify under the microscope.

  • Like 1
Posted

No help but maybe reassuring: had a fairly recent (20yo) Patek manual wind in a few months back with some oddball hole a cap setting superglued in as the Kif spring was broken. Guess they lost the original jewels too. Friend has a box full of envelopes of Kif material so managed to get it right.

 

Crazy thing is it ran. Very, very poorly,  but ran. That's why my client bought it, "ok it just needs a service!"- and a soak in acetone, haha.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/12/2022 at 9:42 PM, grsnovi said:
On 7/12/2022 at 9:42 PM, grsnovi said:

You might try these guys:

https://www.ofrei.com/page615.html

Since you know the make/model and jewel setting diameter, they seem to have quite a selection. They've been pretty good answering my questions but I've never gone to them looking for such a specific part.

 

So my parts came in and I pressed in the new setting and now I have a running watch. Thanks for the lead on this. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...