Jump to content

Zenith Espada Chronograph/Movado Astronic HS 360


Recommended Posts

I’m in the process of servicing this fine model. The glass crystal is well scratched up and the crystal gasket disintegrated to a point beyond recognition. I have yet to be able to find a crystal replacement and will see if I can have it polished.. if anyone knows were I can find a crystal replacement let me know. Assuming I can polish or replace it, the rate limiting factor appears to be sourcing the crystal gasket(s). Does anyone know where to source one or at least how it should look like/dimensions so that hopefully I can find something similar aftermarket? Thanks in advance.

DC915DEE-9AF2-4300-8704-799D63B08C71.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should disassemble the case first and measure the OD and thickness of the crystal and the ID of the bezel. Then you might find the right parts at cousinsuk.com. The dimensional overlap between bezel, gasket and crystal should be about 0,1mm to get a tight fit.

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rasputin said:

will see if I can have it polished.

If needed, as a last measure you can do that yourself quite easily. 

3 hours ago, Rasputin said:

 hopefully I can find something similar aftermarket?

Both glass crystals and their gaskets are made in a large variety of types, and in every possible size. So unless there are very special features on a watch these two items are easily and cheaply replaced. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to relegate this to my watchmaker who indicated that this requires a unique kind of crystal gasket that he has not seen on other watches.  Unfortunately he does not know exactly how it should look like as the original one melted away.  Hence I'm hoping someone give me some guidance as trying to find an OEM replacement has been a struggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Rasputin said:

I had to relegate this to my watchmaker who indicated that this requires a unique kind of crystal gasket that he has not seen on other watches.

Can you post clear pictures of the crystal profile, all its dimensions, and same for the case opening. That is done measuring with a vernier or digital caliper. 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you confirm that the difference between the case opening and the crystal major diameter is 0.14mm that makes a gap in between the two of 0.07mm, that is too little for a nylon (or any material) gasket, which start at 0.4mm. It could be that the crystal is to be glued instead. The other possibility would be that the crystal is held on the smaller step, but I doubt that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/23/2022 at 9:47 AM, jdm said:

If you confirm that the difference between the case opening and the crystal major diameter is 0.14mm that makes a gap in between the two of 0.07mm, that is too little for a nylon (or any material) gasket, which start at 0.4mm. It could be that the crystal is to be glued instead. The other possibility would be that the crystal is held on the smaller step, but I doubt that.

Are you sure glue would be used considering it's likely a water resistant case with a screw down crown and case back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Rasputin said:

Are you sure glue would be used considering it's likely a water resistant case with a screw down crown and case back?

I am just saying that no gasket will fit and the logical consequence is that it has to be glued. Which if done correctly allows no water to enter. The fact that you found the original gasket disintegrated, as in leaving only small debris is consistent with the above. 

BTW, screw down crown and case back are simply features of quality construction, back then as now normally found in dress watches as well. These in itself do not guarantee impermeability, nitryl gaskets do. And in chronos water has also another major way of entering, from the pushers. 

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...